Who were the 10 lost tribes of Israel? What happened to them?
Christian Identity is often thought of as a "racist" denominational sect of Christianity, but it's actually just a migration theory claiming the Israelites migrated through the Caucasus mountains (Caucasian) and became the nations of Europe, and thus are the inheritors of the covenant. It's not a religion, per se. In fact, one could be atheist and still adhere to the the concept of Christian Identity.
The relevance of this migration theory (with regard to Christianity) is that God made a covenant (Genesis 12 and 15) with a specific group of people, extending through the seedline of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The Bible is written to, for and about this group of people. It seems rather important to know who those people are.
The above video provides some clarity on that subject.
I'll be the first to admit, I don't watch much TV. And when I do, it's usually some kind of true crime documentary, like 20/20 or something. I've always had a hard time watching fantasy stuff, or action shows where a person can predict the ending by the time they are age 5 (spoiler alert: the main character always wins).
Last night I was bored and thought I'd watch some TV. I opted for the latest episode of 20/20 titled, The Pointe of No Return. This detailed the events surrounding the murder of a man by his wife. Again, I'm not much for keeping up with this kind of stuff, so I wasn't familiar with it, but it appeared that this was somewhat of a national story at the time it happened.
There were a few points of interest that I thought I'd write about.
When programs like 20/20 does a show like this, they are obviously in the business of getting people to watch, not passing judgement. But to me, it was rather obvious this woman was a complete psychopath.
However, this gets back to a concept I have perpetually contemplated, being "truth is perception." I have absolutely no doubt that many people would disagree with my "psychopath" diagnosis of this woman, as there were people marching on her behalf during the trial.
I also have very little doubt that if the gender roles were reversed in this case, the man would have likely got the death penalty. The level of premeditation by this woman was astounding.
The show ended before sentencing, but I looked it up and she ended up getting 20 years after being convicted of a lesser charge of manslaughter.
Early on the jury came back and said they couldn't reach a verdict, which tells me that there was a feminist holdout who didn't see how psychopathic this woman was (or they did, and didn't care, because they were convinced the man deserved it). How could someone not see that? If you watch the show, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Furthermore, the defense called an "expert" witness who testified that the victim exhibited all the traits of an alpha male. Similarly to how social engineering has used "racism" to vilify whiteness, feminism has done the same to masculinity.
She literally shot her husband 4 times (missed twice) at close range because he allegedly slapped her. And there are lots of people who believe that she was justified. The only people who could actually work through the mental gymnastics of that are just feminist misandrists. They hate men. Period.
Feminism is this idea of equality, yet this psychopathic killer only got 20 years because she is a female. That's inequality.
I have wrote quite a bit about the woman question, not as a critique of women in general, but with regard to their role in the social hierarchy within the status quo in relation to power (i.e. feminism).
It's really such a sad situation. The "black swan" killed the father of her child, and the father of his child with another woman who had already passed away. It's one of the saddest shows I have seen and I just can't imagine the level of psychopathy that exists within certain individuals in the world.
God bless the children involved in this terrible situation.
The NFL will remove the words "End Racism" from the end zones at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans ahead of the Super Bowl on Sunday, the NFL confirmed to NBC News.
Instead, the field will have stencils of the phrase "Choose Love" as the Kansas City Chiefs take on the Philadelphia Eagles, NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in a statement Tuesday.
Throughout the 2024-25 season, NFL teams have advertised pro-diversity slogans at their stadiums and on their uniforms. The field stencils have been a part of the league since 2020, McCarthy said.
"Teams have used on the field this year 'Vote,' 'End Racism,' 'Stop Hate,' and 'Choose Love.' This is part of the NFL’s Inspire Change," he said.
At their conference championship games on Jan. 26, the Chiefs had "Choose Love" in their end zone and the Eagles had "End Racism."
The NFL said Tuesday that it would have stenciling only of the phrase "Choose Love." Sunday's game will be the first Super Bowl since February 2021 at which "End Racism" will not be in an end zone stencil.
We are witnessing more and more "reversion of change" within the status quo, which I have talked about quite a bit recently. This phenomenon has been accelerated by the Trump nomination. We are slowly getting back to normalcy.
Being anti-racist is just being anti-white.
The social engineers who propagate things like "end racism" are explicitly and exclusively targeting white people. The want to install white guilt to change the demographics of America. And they don't just want demographic change, they want white genocide.
It's nice to see society rejecting the anti-white's #1 weapon used to promote white genocide. These people aren't dumb, they know the Overton window has shifted and calling white people "racist" just isn't effective anymore (Btw, the "R word" is just the "N word" for white people.). So they are going back to their roots and switching back to "love" and other propaganda that appeals to emotions. This is exactly what made the civil rights movement of the 60s so successful. They learned these tactics (which activists like MLK and Rosa Parks were students and taught) at the Frankfurt School.
It's time to put an end to white guilt, acknowledge white innovation and stop white genocide!
I recently wrote about UFC Bryce Mitchell being based due to him stating publicly that he would like to go fishing with Hitler.
This last weekend I watched Israel Adesanya get KO'd, and that sparked a couple of bold UFC predictions that I thought I'd share:
1. Israel Adesanya will never win another UFC fight.
2. Colby Covington will never win another UFC fight.
3. Conor McGregor will never win another UFC fight.
4. Kamaru Usman will never win another UFC fight.
5. Robert Whitaker will never win another UFC fight.
Some might look at these predictions and think that are either BS or easy to make, but everyone of these men are former champions and none are older than their mid 30s.
Bryce, a high level UFC fighter, started his podcast Arkansanity out with a bang when he said he would love to go fishing with Hitler. And that all Hitler wanted to do was kick out the greedy Jews and queers.
Shoutout to Dana for allowing free speech. It's literally the only organization left in the world that isn't feelings-based.
Personally, I'm not a huge fan of Hitler, but anyone who has been demonized as much as him has to be examined more closely. I assume that if Nazis controlled the media, Hitler wouldn't be viewed in the same light.
I believe it was Goering when he was at Nuremburg that said, "Victors write the history books."
My personal opinion about WW2 is that it was the biggest act of human eugenics in modernity (if not ever). Think about it from an evolutionary perspective: all the best Germans were killed, and all the worst Jews were killed. I shouldn't have to point this out, but I will anyway: "best" and "worst" not in a moral or judgmental sense, but in terms of status, traits, intelligence, etc. All the Einstein's were long gone by the time the they started rounding the Jews up in the ghettos.
Nonetheless, the Overton window has shifted. If you haven't been on X lately, go check it out. It reads like Stormfront did 15 years ago.
Kudos to Bryce for not being afraid to speak his mind. It's always been super weird to me that people get so caught up in what someone they don't even know says. Who cares if someone hypothetically would go fishing with a dead person from history? Just stay in your own lane.
President Donald Trump addressed reporters during a live briefing on Thursday, Jan. 30, regarding the deadly American Airlines collision with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter over Washington, D.C.
On the evening of Jan. 29, AA Flight 5342 collided with a Black Hawk helicopter over the Potomac River as the passenger flight approached Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The crash, which involved three soldiers on the helicopter and 64 people on the airplane, is believed to be the most deadly aircraft incident since 2001.
During the press conference, Trump, 78, called the accident "a real tragedy" and "a tragedy of terrible proportions." He then made claims that the government's diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies and the mental health of employees were to blame before eventually getting into a heated exchange with reporters in the room during a Q&A.
"FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities," the president said. "And then it says, FAA says people with severe disabilities are most underrepresented segment of the workforce. And they want 'em in and they want them, they can be air traffic controllers. I don't think so."
He then said that the "FAA is actively recruiting workers who suffer severe intellectual disabilities, psychiatric problems and other mental and physical conditions under a diversity and inclusion hiring initiatives spelled out on the agency's website."
He then went on to say that "you need a very special talent and a very special genius to be able to [do the job of an air traffic controller]" and that the FAA's diversity and inclusion hiring did not ensure safe and efficient travel. "I don't think so. I don't think so," he said.
This is a continuum of my Reversion of Change series of recent. The concept being that social change was engineered by people with an anti-white agenda, and consequently we have seen a drastic decline in American exceptionalism.
What President Trump is doing is attempting to reverse "change" and restore American exceptionalism by doing away with the silly propaganda of Marxists who put this idea in the social sphere that everyone is the exact same.
American exceptionalism isn't an idea, it's the merit of a people blessed by God.
For years, rationally-minded people have known that diversity is a subversive pogrom designed to implement white genocide.
To be honest, it hasn't even been that "subversive," they've told us for years, as Ms Goldstein pointed out back in 2015.
But, thankfully, we have a president who is America first. Who wants to reverse the trend of white genocide.
The single biggest threat to America, is the genocide of Americans.
At the signing of the Laken Riley Act, President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he is directing the opening of a detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to hold up to 30,000 migrants who are living illegally in the United States and cannot be deported to their home countries.
“We’re going to send them out to Guantanamo,” the president said in the White House East Room. He did not elaborate.
The U.S. military base has been used to house detainees from the U.S. war on terrorism.
The Laken Riley Act was described by Trump as a “landmark law” and “tremendous tribute” to the slain Georgia nursing student for whom it is named. The law mandates that people in the U.S. illegally who are accused of theft and violent crimes be detained and potentially deported, even before a conviction.
Laken Riley, 22, went out for a run in February 2024 and was killed by Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan national who was in the country illegally. Ibarra was found guilty in November and sentenced to life without parole.
Yesterday I wrote a post titled Reversion of Change in which I highlighted how "change" is essentially a pendulum of revolutionary anti-power.
For years, illegal aliens have flooded the country (mostly due to capitalism, not idealism) and changed the culture due to the change in demographics.
Reasoning should always be viewed as an onion. Personally, the foundation of social reasoning comes down to demographics. America is a people, not an idea.
This isn't to moralize non-Americans, it's just a fact.
A big problem within conservative circles is that they have succumbed to liberal indoctrination (again, not moralizing, just a fact) to think that the foundational problem isn't demographics, it's merit or whatever they think.
For them, they could care less if America was 90% Haitian, as long as they voted Republican and spoke English.
The relevance of this is what you see going on with the Trump administration. In order to save America (MAGA), America has to be populated by Americans. Again, this isn't some blanketed statement of bigotry, it's just what it is. If you wanted to stop Navajo genocide, you would stop flooding Navajo lands with non-Navajo people. It's really not that complicated. But leftists have subverted the conversation by moralizing it in a way that if you are white (American) and want your country to remain American (white) you're a bad person. This is the entire reason that words like "racist" have been seeded in the political sphere by social engineers with an anti-white agenda.
A lot of right-wingers have been negative about Trump. A lot in part because he didn't do a lot of the things he said he was going to do in 2016. Along with his views on Israel. But, nobody (especially a politician) is going to be perfect and check every box that you want them too.
What Trump is doing thus far is as good as you could ask for if you're an American who voted for him with the idea of MAGA.
