Monday, December 27, 2021

Science! has Come up With a Miraculous Cure for Obesity: Wire Your Mouth Shut


https://scitechdaily.com/dentalslim-diet-control-researchers-develop-world-first-weight-loss-device/


University of Otago and UK researchers have developed a world-first weight-loss device to help fight the global obesity epidemic.

DentalSlim Diet Control is an intra-oral device fitted by a dental professional to the upper and lower back teeth. It uses magnetic devices with unique custom-manufactured locking bolts. It allows the wearer to open their mouths only about 2mm, restricting them to a liquid diet, but it allows free speech and doesn’t restrict breathing.

Participants in a Dunedin-based trial lost an average of 6.36kg in two weeks and were motivated to continue with their weight loss journey.

Lead researcher, University of Otago Health Sciences Pro-Vice-Chancellor Professor Paul Brunton says the device will be an effective, safe, and affordable tool for people battling obesity. It is fitted by a dentist, can be released by the user in the case of an emergency and can be repeatedly fitted and removed.

Recent studies revealed 1.9 billion adults worldwide are overweight and 650 million are obese and being overweight or obese results in about 2.8 million deaths a year. It is estimated about 57 percent of the world’s adult population will be overweight or obese by 2030.


We should all be extremely grateful that the elites care so much about our health.

They only fatten us up with poison because they care about us. Just like a farmer cares about his cattle.

They've poisoned us with processed foods, GMOs, plastics, sodas and fast food for the last 50 years, to the point that 3 million people are dying annually. 

Now, thanks to Science!, you now have the option of wiring your mouth shut with magnets so you don't overfeed yourself with toxic sludge. But don't worry! You can still drink your candy bar and soda through a straw. 

Just another spectacular innovation of utopianism. Like Oxycontin. And Suboxone. And Narcan.

It's interesting to ponder how the obesity pandemic has impacted the healthcare system. It's also interesting to ponder why the people who care so much about us allow corporations to make billions in profits off of poisoning people. Then those same corporations use those profits to undermine the social fabric of America.

Is it just random chance that every single one of these mega-corporations who made billions from poisoning Americans invest those profits in anti-White/anti-American causes? 

What am I talking about? I'm starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist or something. I'm sure it's all just a coincidence.

Monday, December 20, 2021

Mom Boasts About Using Her 1-Year-Old Twins As Big Pharma Guinea Pigs

 


https://www.yahoo.com/news/latina-doctor-wanted-spark-trust-110050945.html


Alicia Carrasco could feel her arms getting tired from the weight of her 1-year-old son, Joaquín. She looked over across the room at her husband who was holding the baby's twin brother, Nico.

The boys clocked a low-grade fever earlier that morning. They were fussy and tired, and refused to leave their parents’ arms without a tantrum.

On days when her sons get sick, Carrasco is normally filled with worry. But this day she was relieved, because it meant their little bodies were likely building up immunity to protect them against COVID-19.

“I felt guilty over how happy I was that they got sick, but now it’s a huge weight off my shoulders,” she said.

There are no authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. for children younger than 5 years old. But kids like Carrasco’s twins and 3-year-old son, Matías, who participated in Moderna’s trial, are helping to change that.

“They were definitely sleeping a lot more the next day, fussy and had spiked fevers,” she said. “Nothing major, and it went away 36 hours after the shot.”

Matías also takes pride in protecting his vulnerable family members. He often boasts of his bravery at the doctor’s office and the toys his parents buy with the money they’re given for participating in the trial, which they jokingly refer to as his “blood money.”

“He goes, ‘Grandmama, I get to see you and you get to visit because I went to the office,’” Carrasco said. “He gets super proud of the blood draws and being a big boy there.” 

 

What's the deal with injection-obsession?

Her babies likely got sicker from the injections than they would have from COVID.

Any parent who boasts about using their babies as Big Pharma guinea pigs is a sick individual.

It comes down to common sense combined with a little critical thinking (i.e., risk/reward). What is a bigger risk to those babies? Injecting an experimental gene-editing serum into their body, or them catching COVID?

I certainly don't have any objections to adults taking injections, if that's what they want to do. But when you boast about injecting your 1-year-old twins with experimental serums, and are relieved when they get sick, you're twisted. 

Furthermore, the USA Today acting as if this lady is some kind of virtuous hero is pathetic, and exactly why people have no respect or trust for them. 

Anyone with any common sense would ask the question: "They're only 1. Are you sure using your babies as Big Pharma guinea pigs is the right thing to do as a parent? I know I wouldn't do that with my babies. Have you not seen Dopesick?"

What kind of story is the USA Today going to publish if those babies develop some kind of health issues? Or, if they end up catching COVID anyway?

Not to be redundant, but those babies were effectively at zero-risk of having any issues from COVID. To have that much faith in Big Pharma - considering Big Pharma's track record, and the limited amount of time to examine potential side-effects from this new technology - is truly amazing. It's essentially zero reward and all risk.

Injection-obsession is a very weird thing to observe and process.

Please don't use your 1-year-old child as a guinea pig, or as a virtue-signalling prop. 
 

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Sunday Scripture

 



Genesis 3:6

So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. 

Friday, December 17, 2021

Experts Say Best Defense Against COVID is to Get Vaccinated and Catch COVID


https://news.yahoo.com/full-vaccination-against-covid-19-110257193.html


A study by Oregon researchers finds that people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 who have a breakthrough infection end up with what the authors call "super immunity."

They caution the vaccinated should not seek COVID-19 infection, but the "hybrid immunity" offers some solace for those who catch one despite having been vaccinated. 

"The bottom line of the study is that vaccine provides you with foundational immunity for whatever comes next," said Fikadu Tafesse, a professor of molecular microbiology and immunology in the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in Portland, Oregon.

The study matched 26 vaccinated Oregon Health & Science University staff people who had breakthrough infections with a similar group who were vaccinated but hadn't had COVID-19.

The people who were vaccinated and then got COVID-19 showed a substantial increase in antibody levels, said Tafesse.

"The increases were substantial, up to a 1,000% increase and sometimes up to 2,000%, so it's really high immunity," he said. "It's almost 'super immunity.'"

Multiple other studies have shown that infection with COVID-19 followed by one dose of the vaccine is very protective against re-infection.

“This is one of the first that shows a breakthrough infection following vaccination generates stronger immunity than prior infection or vaccination alone,” said Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco.

While possibly equally protective, the reverse order is not recommended. Getting COVID-19 before being vaccinated is dangerous because “we cannot predict who will get very ill with COVID,” Gandhi said. 


I'm going to go out on a limb here and make a bold statement: an idiot could figure this out.

I'm going to go ever further out on the proverbial limb and make an even bolder statement: the experts are idiots.

Think about the expertise of an "expert" who says: "Hey fellow experts. I got an idea. I bet the people who have been vaccinated for COVID and catch COVID might have even higher immunity than someone who has only been vaccinated or just had a prior infection. My hypothesis is that they have super immunity. Let's do some tests to prove my theory."

Furthermore, think about the journalist who comes up with this headline: "Full vaccination against COVID-19 and a breakthrough infection builds 'super immunity,' study finds." That's a journalist with some journalistic integrity. She probably even defines burning down buildings and looting as "peaceful protesting." Nonetheless, I bet nobody else on the planet could do her job. She deserves an award or something. 

Finally, let's ponder the type of person who would read such an article with sincere intrigue. One might wonder what that reader could be convinced of. I surmise that if I had access to anyone who was like, "hmm, look at this article. I would have never thought about that. What an interesting subject. Let's give it a read," that I could possibly convince them that wearing an N95 mask in the car by themselves while driving down the highway would give them a 96.9% chance of not catching COVID from their own breath. Or maybe even that there is a 75% chance that they could catch ear cancer from the radio if they listen to FOX NEWS. But who knows.

Humans are an interesting bunch. 

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Scientists Successfully Transplant Genetically-Engineered Pig Kidney into Human


https://scitechdaily.com/successful-xenotransplantation-surgery-genetically-engineered-pig-kidney-transplanted-to-human-body/


Less than two months after the first breakthrough surgery, NYU Langone Health has performed its second successful investigational xenotransplantation procedure using a genetically engineered pig kidney. This second surgery is a sign of continued progress toward a potential alternative supply of life-saving organs.

Leading the second surgical procedure was Robert Montgomery, MD, DPhil, the H. Leon Pachter, MD, Professor and chair of the Department of Surgery at NYU Langone and director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute. He transplanted a pig kidney lacking the alpha-gal gene to a recently deceased donor maintained on a ventilator. LiveOnNY, the nonprofit organization that facilitates organ and tissue donation in the greater New York City area, assisted in identifying a generous whole-body donor to help move this landmark research forward.

“We have been able to replicate the results from the first transformative procedure to demonstrate the continued promise that these genetically engineered organs could be a renewable source of organs to the many people around the world awaiting a life-saving gift,” says Montgomery. “There is much more work to do before we begin living human trials, but our preliminary findings give us hope.”

The procedure, part of an ongoing study, was performed on Monday, November 22, 2021, at an NYU Langone research laboratory in Manhattan. The kidney was procured from a GalSafeTM pig engineered by Revivicor, Inc., a subsidiary of United Therapeutics Corporation. The gene that encodes the glycan known as alpha-gal—which is responsible for a rapid antibody-mediated rejection of porcine organs by humans—was “knocked out” in the donor pig. The pig’s thymus gland, responsible for “educating” the immune system, was fused with the kidney before transplantation.


Genetic-Engineering is a by-product of white supremacy. Not the abstract version of white supremacy, that anti-whites use as a usurping tool, but the tangible version.

The problem with Science! isn't that it highlights the supremacy of white ingenuity, but that it attempts to replace God with men. 

Science! is a religion, and all religions require faith. 

At some point we will all die. I have no doubt that scientists disagree. I also have no doubt that in the near future humans will likely be capable of living twice as long as they do now. But this illustrates the problem: we have to be able to come to terms with death, and Science! ultimately makes that worse, because it makes death the end, whereas Christianity makes death the beginning. 

Hope is an overused word, but humans have to have hope. The hope that Science! provides is to be saved by men who replace your failing kidney with a genetically-engineered pig kidney (keep in mind, this is just the beginning; it doesn't stop with pig kidneys).

The future for humanity in a world ruled by Science! appears very dystopian:

  • genetically-engineered Frankensteins
  • eat a diet of bugs and GMO plants
  • fear-based life; masks, injections, pills, etc
  • escapism with drugs like DMT 
  • reproduction is mostly engineered, not created (ie Gattaca)
  • live in a tiny home in a skyscraper with thousands of other Frankensteins
  • existence is a construct; virtual in a metaverse

Who would want to exist in a reality like that? That sounds a lot like hell.

The decision becomes binary: hope in man and humanity, or faith in God and eternity.

Psalm 146:3-5

3 Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.

4 His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.

5 Happy is he that hath the God of Jacob for his help, whose hope is in the Lord his God:


 


Wednesday, December 15, 2021

NFL Has Record COVID Cases Even Though Almost Everyone is Vaccinated



https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/12/14/two-days-75-positive-player-covid-tests/ 

 

The NFL has a full-blown COVID crisis, at a time when many have become numb to the realities of the ongoing pandemic.

Via Adam Schefter of ESPN.com, a total of 75 players have tested positive in the last two days. Seventy. Five.

It’s the highest two-day total since the pandemic began. And while it’s not nearly enough to cause the NFL to cancel games or pause the season (neither will be happening), it’s cause for concern as to where things may lead if the league doesn’t get things under control, quickly.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/more-sports/covid-19-is-wreaking-havoc-on-nfl-nba-and-nhl-can-booster-shots-save-the-season-s/ar-AARONeA?li=BB15ms5q 


From the NFL reporting a single-day high in cases, to the NHL’s Calgary Flames forced to postpone three games and the Chicago Bulls postponing two games after 10 players entered COVID-19 protocols, every active league is seeing its regular season – and, in the NFL’s case, playoff push – imperiled by the pandemic.

Tuesday marked the first anniversary since a New York critical-care nurse became one of the first Americans to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, and in the 12 months since, sports leagues re-wrote safety protocols and urged their players to get vaccinated once they became widely available last spring.

Entering the teeth of this winter, the effort was largely a success: The NFL reports nearly 95% of its players vaccinated, the NHL has just one unvaccinated holdout and the NBA also exceeds 97%, despite high-profile holdouts such as Brooklyn Nets guard Kyrie Irving and Detroit Red Wings forward Tyler Bertuzzi.

Yet the past week has resulted in more postponements and players in protocol than even navigating through an unvaccinated 2020-21 winter. 


How does this make any sense? I thought Science! was suppose to make sense.

Some of the healthiest men on the planet have been forced to take injections on the premise that the injections would prevent them from getting sick and enable them to play sportsball uninterruptedly. 

However, there are more players testing positive for COVID now than before a vaccine even existed. 

How does the Science! explain that? 

How do the people who are forcing others to take injections just so they can work justify their actions? 

From a logical perspective, the only leg the injection-tyrants have to stand on is the, "yea, the vax doesn't actually prevent people from getting sick, it just keeps people from dying. And it makes you a good person."

Have the injections prevented any of these athletes from dying? 

If the injections don't prevent athletes from contacting COVID, nor do they keep athletes from dying from COVID, what exactly is the point of forcing them to take injections?

Obviously, sportsball players are paid to run fast with a ball and not for their cognitive abilities. But certainly a couple of them have to be scratching their heads and saying: "Hold up. I thought you said if I take this shot that I wouldn't get sick and we could just play ball. I didn't want to get that damn shot anyway."

People need to understand that Science! is a religion. Belief systems all require faith. When faith generates cognitive dissonance, people begin to doubt.


 

Sunday, December 12, 2021

Sunday Scripture:

 


Acts 17:30 

In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent.

Saturday, December 11, 2021

80% of Omicron Cases are Fully Vaccinated


https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-reported-us-omicron-cases-have-hit-fully-vaccinated-cdc-2021-12-10/


Most of the 43 COVID-19 cases caused by the Omicron variant identified in the United States so far were in people who were fully vaccinated, and a third of them had received a booster dose, according to a U.S. report published on Friday.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that of the 43 cases attributed to Omicron variant, 34 people had been fully vaccinated. Fourteen of them had also received a booster, although five of those cases occurred less than 14 days after the additional shot before full protection kicks in.

While the numbers are very small, they add to growing concerns that current COVID-19 vaccines may offer less protection against the highly transmissible new variant.

Among the Omicron cases, 25 were in people aged 18 to 39 and 14 had traveled internationally. Six people had previously been infected with the coronavirus.

Most of them only had mild symptoms such as coughing, congestion, and fatigue, the report said, and one person was hospitalized for two days. Other symptoms reported less frequently including nausea or vomiting, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, diarrhea and loss of taste or smell. 

The Delta variant still accounts for more than 99% of all U.S. cases. But reports from South Africa show that the Omicron variant is very transmissible.

Even if most cases are mild, a highly transmissible variant could result in enough infections to overwhelm health systems, the CDC cautioned.

Laboratory studies released this week suggest that the Omicron variant will blunt the protective power of two doses of Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine, although a third dose may restore that protection. 


Could Omicron be the ADE variant that censored experts have been warning about?

Is it just a random coincidence that 80% of the confirmed Omicron-COVID cases have been in people who have been "fully" vaccinated against COVID?

I often wonder how this pandemic would have played out if the government would have never stepped in with their lockdowns, mask mandates, censorship, etc. 

So many things never made any sense from a rational perspective. Like the curfews: If the goal was to spread people out as much as possible, why would you limit the time they could interact? Why would Walmart close from 10pm-6am and minimize the amount of time that people could shop? Wouldn't it make more sense to allow those who could shop during those hours to do so? Wouldn't that technically be a social-distancing measure?  

And what about the masks? Have you ever observed how much people touch their face when they're wearing a mask? Or how disgusting some people's masks look? There's a reason that medical professionals are trained in proper PPE technique in order to limit cross-contamination. Assuming children are using proper PPE protocols when wearing their masks is just silly. A valid argument can be made that masks have caused as much problems as they have solutions.  

Hindsight is always 20/20, but I can't help but conclude that there is a competency issue with those calling the shots on how to deal with COVID. Have they been right about anything? I'm not trying to be an armchair quarterback, but I can't really think of anything that the government-elites have done that I can honestly say made a huge difference in the pandemic:

  • Mask mandates: Dumb 
  • Vaccine mandates: Dumb 
  • Lockdowns: Dumb
  • Printing trillions of dollars: Dumb
  • Censorship: Dumb

Most pandemics last 2 years, and we're 2 years in and the pandemic is still going strong. How much of that is because the government-elite's intrusion? What would the data look like without any of these implicated measures? Would there be less death? Less hospitalizations? Less economic hardship? Less inflation? Less misinformation? 

The US government was involved in making the vaccines, and actually owns part of the patent for the Moderna vaccine. So they certainly have a dog in the fight on the vaccine front, beyond just "caring about your health."

Just because large profits are part of the equation doesn't automatically mean that the vaccines don't work, or aren't effective. The vaccines might be everything they're said to be. They might be the best tool we have to fight COVID. But large profits create motivation, too. Remember when Oxycontin was the new "miracle drug"?

It appears rather obvious to me that Omicron is going to force the need for another vaccine, as we can see the current vaccines aren't very effective. This will generate billions in revenue for Big Pharma. But, in the long run, will it show to have been an effective measure against COVID? Because at the end of the day, pandemics aren't about profits and power. Or, are they?

Friday, December 10, 2021

#BlackPrivilege: Police Chief Would Have Let Smollett Go If He Had Apologized

 


https://nypost.com/2021/12/10/chicago-police-chief-wouldnt-have-arrested-smollett-if-hed-apologized/


The Chicago police chief who arrested Jussie Smollett for staging a race-baiting attack on himself said Friday that he would have let the actor go free if he’d just apologized and admitted that he was lying early on.

Eddie Johnson, head of the Chicago Police Department in 2019, wouldn’t have pursued charges against the “Empire” actor if he’d simply admitted he’d made it all up, he told “Morning in America.”

“I want people to understand this. This was not the most heinous crime of the century. He didn’t kill anybody. He didn’t blow up a building,” Johnson said.

“We would have been more than happy with just an apology at the end of all that we uncovered but for some reason, he just wanted to keep going down this road that he was actually a victim.”

Smollett was found guilty Thursday on five counts of felony disorderly conduct for filing a false police report claiming he’d been jumped by a pair of racist and homophobic attackers in January 2019.

While on the case, Johnson — who was later fired for misconduct in December 2019 after he was found drunk in a parked patrol car — said he knew quickly that Smollett was lying about being brutalized. 

The former top cop said a video showing the actor with a noose hanging around his neck at his home, long after the crime was committed, was the first red flag.

“I have to be honest, when I first saw the video of him in his apartment with the noose around his neck I was concerned because I don’t think there’s many black people in America with a noose around their neck and wouldn’t immediately take it off,” said Johnson, who is also black. 

Johnson said police and then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel got fired up about the case because Smollett “stained our city” and wasted police “manpower.” 

But he said he still “made it a point” to treat Smollett like a victim until the evidence was undeniable.  


Smollett dindu nuffin. Even the former drunken police chief admits that. It's almost like it's his daddy telling the world that he's really a good boy and this was all just a misunderstanding. In fact, if Smollett's dad was black - and not Jewish - I might be inclined to think that perhaps the former drunken police chief could possibly be Smollett's father.

It's amazing how "hate crimes" are such a serious thing until someone fakes them. If someone had actually beat up the gay-mulatto-Jew they would've rotted in prison.


Anyone caught lying about such a serious crime should at minimum face the same punishment. 

It's estimated that up to 50% of "hate crime" accusations are false.

The same can be said of rape: 60% of rape accusations are false.

Think about the type of person who would falsely accuse someone of a "hate crime" or rape. Those people are sociopaths and deserve to be incarcerated. Which is exactly what should happen if someone is caught making false accusations. Whatever punishment the falsely accused victim would have received is what the liar should get. Problem solved. 




 

 

Thursday, December 9, 2021

Canada Is One Step Closer to Making Heterosexuality Illegal


https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/09/americas/canada-conversion-therapy-ban/index.html


Canada on Wednesday banned conversion therapy, which are treatments that claim to be able to change a person's sexual orientation or identity.

The law makes it a crime to subject a person of any age, consenting or not, to such treatment.

So-called conversion therapies rely on the assumption that sexual orientation can be changed or "cured" -- an idea discredited by major medical associations in the US, the UK and elsewhere.

It's often performed by religious leaders, but licensed clinicians are also engaged in the practice.

The Canadian bill makes "providing, promoting, or advertising conversion therapy" a criminal offense, the Senate of Canada said on Twitter. It will also be an offense to profit from the provision of conversion therapy.

In addition, the bill states a person cannot remove a "child from Canada with the intention that the child undergo conversion therapy outside Canada." The Criminal Code violations will go into effect 30 days after the bill received the Royal Assent on Wednesday.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hailed the Royal Assent, which is granted by the Governor General of Canada.

"It's official: Our government's legislation banning the despicable and degrading practice of conversion therapy has received Royal Assent -- meaning it is now law," he wrote on Twitter. "LGBTQ2 Canadians, we'll always stand up for you and your rights."

"LGBTQ2" is the acronym used by the Canadian government, with the "2" referring to Two-Spirit, "a culturally-specific identity used by some Indigenous people to indicate a person whose gender identity, spiritual identity and/or sexual orientation comprises both male and female spirits," according to the government's glossary of terminology. 

 

So, let's get this straight: it's illegal to change a person's sexual orientation if they're gay, but encouraged if they're straight? How does that makes sense to anyone who isn't stupid?

In Trudeau's Canada, if Tom wants to become Tina, or worship the brown eye... that's perfect! Let's pridefully celebrate with rainbow flags and parades. But, if Tom doesn't like that he wants to be Tina, or lust over poop shoots, and he wants to get some therapy..... that's terrible! And now it's also illegal and punishable by jail time. Even if Tom decides to go out of the country to work on his problems, he will be charged with a crime. 

In Canada, mental illness and sexual degeneracy are core values.

Remember: hypocrisy always has an agenda. 

So the question becomes: but why?

The answer is obvious. Canadians don't need reproductive families, so they've decided to reject God and align themselves with Satan as an effective approach to population control.

The middle class has always existed for a reason. Kings needed armies. Factories needed workers. Governments needed taxes. But, the nuclear weapon eliminated the need for armies. Automation has eliminated the need for the working class. And the transfer of almost all the world's wealth to a tiny fraction of elites has eliminated the need for taxes. Therefore, the middle class has become obsolete. 

Anyone who thinks Trudeau is just a great guy who cares so much about sodomites and schizophrenics is most likely a sodomite or schizophrenic. If Trudeau really cared about those people he would do the exact opposite of what he's doing. He would make therapy mandatory and flamboyant homosexuality illegal.

But, like the rest of the elites, Trudeau is a sociopath who has sold his soul to Satan as a method to enforce his agenda. 

To recap: western liberalism is the de facto ideology of elites who want to depopulate the planet. These are evil people masquerading themselves as virtuous ideologues who care about humanity. When in fact, they hate humanity so much that they have aligned themselves with the father of lies (Satan) to subliminally manipulate humans into destroying themselves by using social-engineered psyop methods to encourage people to become gay/tranny/feminist/liberal so that they ultimately don't reproduce. 

Work it out in your head. Think about it. This isn't hard to figure out once you understand that these people are liars who worship the father of lies:

John 8:44 - For you are the children of your father the devil, and you love to do the evil things he does. He was a murderer from the beginning. He has always hated the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, it is consistent with his character; for he is a liar and the father of lies.

We are in a spiritual war. If you can't see that, open your eyes! Or at least open your Bible.

 

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Poor Moderna: Omicron Will Create Demand for Another 3 Billion Doses

 


https://www.ft.com/content/27def1b9-b9c8-47a5-8e06-72e432e0838f


The chief executive of Moderna has predicted that existing vaccines will be much less effective at tackling Omicron than earlier strains of coronavirus and warned it would take months before pharmaceutical companies could manufacture new variant-specific jabs at scale.

Stéphane Bancel said the high number of Omicron mutations on the spike protein, which the virus uses to infect human cells, and the rapid spread of the variant in South Africa suggested that the current crop of vaccines may need to be modified next year.

“There is no world, I think, where [the effectiveness] is the same level . . . we had with [the] Delta [variant],” Bancel told the Financial Times in an interview at the company’s headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

He added: “I think it’s going to be a material drop. I just don’t know how much because we need to wait for the data. But all the scientists I’ve talked to . . . are like, ‘This is not going to be good’.”

However, Bancel said scientists were worried because 32 of the 50 mutations in the Omicron variant are on the spike protein, which current vaccines focus on to boost the human body’s immune system to combat Covid.

Most experts thought such a highly mutated variant would not emerge for another year or two, Bancel added.

A Stanford University study of a Delta outbreak at a California prison published last month found that Moderna’s jab was 56.6 per cent effective against infection — substantially lower than the level in studies conducted before the emergence of the variant, the researchers said.

But he said it would take several months before an Omicron-specific vaccine could be produced at scale, and suggested there might be a case for giving more potent boosters to the elderly or people with compromised immune systems in the meantime.

“[Moderna] and Pfizer cannot get a billion doses next week. The maths doesn’t work. But could we get the billion doses out by the summer? Sure,” said Bancel, who predicted Moderna could make a total of 2bn-3bn doses in 2022.

Bancel also hit out at critics who have accused vaccine makers of not doing enough to support rollouts in developing countries such as South Africa, where only a quarter of the population is fully inoculated, according to Johns Hopkins University.

“This was mostly a policy decision by the rich countries. In the US, we were told we had no choice but to give 60 per cent of our output to the US government. That was not a Moderna decision, that was a US government decision,” he said.

Bancel also said there was a surplus of jabs earmarked for Africa and that 70m Moderna vaccines were sitting in warehouses because Covax, an international body tasked with supplying low-income nations, or individual governments had not taken delivery of them.

“We are running out of space,” he said. “It’s because either they don’t have customs documents, or they don’t have fridge space, or because the ability to get doses in arms is a challenge.”

 

You mean the experts were wrong again? I just don't get it. 

I can sense the frustration Bancel has with the likely possibility that his company has to produce another "2bn-3bn" doses. I'm sure shareholders are wrecked.

So far, nobody knows anything about Omicron. Other than people need more injections. 

It's also interesting that Moderna was forced to "give" 60% of their output to the US. Who else were they going to sell it to?  

If the US didn't take part ownership of the patent, then Moderna wouldn't have made billions of dollars off of its vaccine. Besides, it was the former Moderna scientists who now work at NIH who worked so hard on the mRNA technology. 

I'm almost positive that Bancel is such a good guy that he didn't want to be forced to sell 60% of his vaccines to the greedy US. He would have much rather given them away to the 3rd world for free (even though there are 70 million doses earmarked for Africa that are rotting in a warehouse). 

Nonetheless, we can all empathize with Big Pharma over this new variant. They're going to be forced to make billions of dollars just because they care about us so much. 

Thanks, Big Pharma!

 

 

 

Monday, November 29, 2021

CDC Doesn't Know Anything about Omicron, Except that You Need a Booster


 https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/29/health/cdc-booster-guidance-omicron/index.html


The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strengthened recommendations for booster doses of coronavirus vaccine Monday, saying all adults should get boosted six months after the second dose of Pfizer/BioNTech's or Moderna's vaccine or two months after the single dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

"Today, CDC is strengthening its recommendation on booster doses for individuals who are 18 years and older," CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement.

"The recent emergence of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) further emphasizes the importance of vaccination, boosters, and prevention efforts needed to protect against COVID-19," she added.

"Early data from South Africa suggest increased transmissibility of the Omicron variant, and scientists in the United States and around the world are urgently examining vaccine effectiveness related to this variant. I strongly encourage the 47 million adults who are not yet vaccinated to get vaccinated as soon as possible and to vaccinate the children and teens in their families as well because strong immunity will likely prevent serious illness."

It will take a few weeks of testing to know for sure whether the Omicron variant is more transmissible than Delta, and whether it evades the protection offered by natural infection or vaccines. Scientists will also be looking to see if it causes more severe disease or evades the effects of treatments.

In the meantime, CDC will be watching for Omicron to appear in the US. That requires an extra step of testing as the tests used to diagnose Covid-19 won't tell people which variant they are infected with. "I also want to encourage people to get a COVID-19 test if they are sick. Increased testing will help us identify Omicron quickly," Walensky said.

"And finally, to stop the spread of COVID-19 we need to follow the prevention strategies we know work," she added. These include vaccination, wearing masks, improving ventilation indoors and keeping a distance from others, especially if they are unvaccinated.


The CDC acknowledges that they don't know anything about Omicron. But, they do know you need a booster shot. 

It's kinda weird how they've pretty much been wrong every step of the way, yet still think people should value their recommendations.  

It's pretty hard to say "we don't know anything about this new variant, nor the efficacy of the vaccines, but go get a booster immediately," and expect people to speed off to the nearest vax clinic. 

Thus far, the only thing we do know is that the symptoms appear to be "extremely mild."

The media definitely went from 0-to-60 in a couple of hours over Omicron. That wasn't a coincidence. The PTB instigated their messengers to create panic. But, why? Could this be the ADE variant, or just a smokescreen for Ghislaine's trial? 

If ADE becomes a thing, it's not like the PTB are going to say, "yup, we were wrong about vaxing into a pandemic." Instead, they will just double-down with, "the unvaccinated have caused COVID to mutate and now it's making the vaccinated very sick."

Time will tell.

Just remember: they care about you. 


 

 

 

 

Sunday, November 28, 2021

Sunday Scripture:

 


Acts 2:21

And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Saturday, November 27, 2021

Israel Using Counter-Terrorism Phone-Tracking Technology to Fight Omicron


https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-ban-entry-foreigners-all-countries-over-omicron-2021-11-27/


Israel on Saturday said it would ban the entry of all foreigners into the country, making it the first country to shut its borders completely in response to a new and potentially more contagious coronavirus variant, and said it would use counter-terrorism phone-tracking technology in order to contain the spread of the Omicron variant.

"Our working hypotheses are that the variant is already in nearly every country," Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked told N12's "Meet the Press," "and that the vaccine is effective, although we don't yet know to what degree."

The Shin Bet counter-terrorism agency's phone-tracking technology will be used to locate carriers of the new variant in order to curb its transmission to others, Bennett said.

Used on and off since March 2020, the surveillance technology matched virus carriers' locations against other mobile phones nearby to determine with whom they had come into contact. Israel's Supreme Court this year limited the scope of its use after civil rights groups mounted challenges over privacy concerns. 

Israel has so far confirmed one case of Omicron, with seven suspected cases. The Health Ministry has not said whether the confirmed case was vaccinated. Three of the seven suspected cases were fully vaccinated, the ministry said on Saturday, and three had not returned from travel abroad recently. 

 

Cell phones are tracking devices. 

Notice how governments justify tracking you? They simply say, "Oh, look. Johnny has a virus so we can access his phone to see everywhere he's been and who he's been in contact with."

Big Brother is watching you. But, no worries. It's for your own good. They just care about you.

Speaking of which, Omicron is the ADE variant. The one that primarily affects the vaccinated because the unvaxed didn't get vaccinated. 

Nuclear weapons eliminated war, which created a vacuum that biological warfare (viruses) and social causes (BLM, feminism, homosexuality) are apparently going to fill.

Friday, November 26, 2021

Will Merck's New COVID Pill Do More Harm than Good?


https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/merck-s-covid-pill-effective-fda-says-experts-now-review-n1284667?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma


Federal health regulators say an experimental Covid-19 pill from Merck is effective against the virus, but they will seek input from outside experts on risks of birth defects and other potential problems during pregnancy.

The Food and Drug Administration posted its analysis of the pill ahead of a public meeting next week where academic and other experts will weigh in on its safety and effectiveness. The agency isn’t required to follow the group’s advice.

The FDA scientists said their review identified several potential risks, including possible toxicity to developing fetuses and birth defects that were identified in studies of the pill in animals.

Given those risks the FDA will ask its advisers next Tuesday whether the drug should never be given during pregnancy or whether it could be made available in certain cases.

Given the safety concerns, FDA said Merck agreed the drug would not be used in children.

Regulators also noted that Merck collected far less safety data overall on its drug than was gathered for other Covid-19 therapies.

“While the clinical safety data base was small, there were no major safety concerns identified,” FDA reviewers concluded.

Additionally, the FDA flagged a concern that Merck’s drug led to small changes in the coronavirus’ signature spike protein, which it uses to penetrate human cells. Theoretically, FDA cautioned, those changes could lead to dangerous new variants. 

Merck’s drug uses a novel approach to fight Covid: it inserts tiny mutations into the coronavirus’ genetic code to stop the virus from reproducing.

But that genetic effect has raised concerns that in rare cases the drug could cause birth defects or even spur more virulent strains of the virus.

Pregnant women were excluded from Merck’s study, and both women and men in the study were instructed to use contraception or abstain from sex. 

Among more than 1,400 adults in a company study, molnupiravir reduced the combined risk of hospitalization and death by 30 percent, less than the 50 percent initially reported based on incomplete results.

Nearly 7 percent of patients who received Merck’s drug within five days of Covid symptoms ended up in the hospital and one died. That compared to 10 percent of patients hospitalized who were taking the placebo and nine deaths. 


If one is faced with death or possible side-effects from a pill, one would certainly say, "give me the pill, doc." 

When malnupiravir was first being hyped as a game-changer, the data was something like 80% effective against severe COVID. Now those numbers have dropped to 30%, and carry the potential of new dangerous variants. This is why there is a process in developing new drugs. But I'm sure Merck will make a lot of money on this pill. Let's just hope it doesn't create the need for more pills.

Unfortunately, one has to wonder if the vaccines have done more harm than good. How different would things be if we had just gone on about our lives, using as much common sense and caution as we could. Would COVID still be a thing? Sure, big pharma would disagree. But they have a dog in the fight that has generated $55 billion to their net worth in less than a year. I suspect capitalists would say anything for $55 billion (remember the "miracle drug" Oxycontin?).

And what about this new pill, that will be available soon? Will it create super variants that our immune systems are incapable of fighting off? Will it ultimately cause more harm than good? 

Have the PTB been right in how they have handled the pandemic? In hindsight, have they made all the right decisions? Nobody would blame them if they've made mistakes, so why not just own them? When you just keep doubling-down, and things continue to stay the same, or get worse, how can people trust those in charge? Honesty goes a long way. And trust is earned. Just keep it real already.


 

 

 

Thursday, November 25, 2021

Climate Change is the Religion of Weathermen Masquerading as Gods


https://scitechdaily.com/flawed-climate-models-arctic-ocean-started-getting-warmer-decades-earlier-than-we-thought/


The Arctic Ocean has been getting warmer since the beginning of the 20th century – decades earlier than records suggest – due to warmer water flowing into the delicate polar ecosystem from the Atlantic Ocean.

An international group of researchers reconstructed the recent history of ocean warming at the gateway to the Arctic Ocean in a region called the Fram Strait, between Greenland and Svalbard.

Using the chemical signatures found in marine microorganisms, the researchers found that the Arctic Ocean began warming rapidly at the beginning of the last century as warmer and saltier waters flowed in from the Atlantic – a phenomenon called Atlantification – and that this change likely preceded the warming documented by modern instrumental measurements. Since 1900, the ocean temperature has risen by approximately 2 degrees Celsius, while sea ice has retreated and salinity has increased.

The results, reported in the journal Science Advances, provide the first historical perspective on Atlantification of the Arctic Ocean and reveal a connection with the North Atlantic that is much stronger than previously thought. The connection is capable of shaping Arctic climate variability, which could have important implications for sea-ice retreat and global sea level rise as the polar ice sheets continue to melt.

All of the world’s oceans are warming due to climate change, but the Arctic Ocean, the smallest and shallowest of the world’s oceans, is warming fastest of all.

“The rate of warming in the Arctic is more than double the global average, due to feedback mechanisms,” said co-lead author Dr. Francesco Muschitiello from Cambridge’s Department of Geography. “Based on satellite measurements, we know that the Arctic Ocean has been steadily warming, in particular over the past 20 years, but we wanted to place the recent warming into a longer context.”

Atlantification is one of the causes of warming in the Arctic, however instrumental records capable of monitoring this process, such as satellites, only go back about 40 years. 


The primary principle of progress is change. 

Change is defined as "to make radically different."

Change is both reactionary and revolutionary. Therefore, to be an advocate for change, one has to present a reasonable argument that change is warranted.

The problem with progressive change is that it's a mindset that never becomes stagnant. In other words, there is no pinnacle; there is no end game. The world could be perfect, and the changeists would still be spotting problems that needed changed.

Changeism is dogmatic and its adherents suffer from delusions of grandeur. They are oxymorons with a god complex. For example, they tend to be humanist and anti-human; white and anti-white; usurpers and destroyers. 

Climate change is the Jesus Christ of changeism. It's their vessel to literally save the world. Thus, they've established the moral high-ground to rule over you, because humans are destroying the planet, and the changeists have to take it upon themselves to save the world. 

The climate is continually changing, just like it always has. Climate change -as we know it- is a hoax. The way they validate the climate change hoax is with Science! But that Science! is just man's interpretation of weather, and used as a proxy for power.

Climate change is the religion of weathermen masquerading as gods. Their disciples are changeists. Changeists are just doomsday prophets on steroids. 

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

Epstein Killed Himself

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/epsteins-final-days-celebrity-reminiscing-133925874.html


The disgraced financier, jailed in Manhattan on federal sex trafficking charges involving teenage girls, was found unconscious on the floor of his cell one morning in July 2019, a strip of bedsheet tied around his bruised neck.

In the hours and days that followed that suicide attempt, Jeffrey Epstein would claim to be living a “wonderful life,” denying any thoughts of ending it, even as he sat on suicide watch and faced daunting legal troubles.

“I have no interest in killing myself,” Epstein told a jailhouse psychologist, according to Bureau of Prisons documents that have not previously been made public. He was a “coward” and did not like pain, he explained. “I would not do that to myself.”

After a life of manipulation, Epstein created illusions until the very end, deceiving correctional officers, counselors and specially trained inmates assigned to monitor him around the clock, according to the documents — among more than 2,000 pages of Federal Bureau of Prisons records obtained by The New York Times after filing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. 

The newly obtained records offer no support to the explosion of conspiracy theories that Epstein’s death was not a suicide. They also shed no light on questions raised by his brother and one of his attorneys that he might have been assisted in killing himself. But they do paint a picture of incompetence and sloppiness by some within the Bureau of Prisons, which runs the federal detention center.

An intake screening form erroneously described Epstein as a Black male (he was white), and indicated that he had no prior sex offense convictions, even though he was a registered sex offender with two 2008 convictions in Florida, for solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors to engage in prostitution. A few social phone calls he made were not recorded, logged or monitored, records show, an apparent violation of jail policy. 

Two days after the suicide, William Barr, then the U.S. attorney general, said there were “serious irregularities” at the correctional center, but did not elaborate. He later blamed “a perfect storm of screw-ups.”

A 15-page psychological reconstruction of Epstein’s death, compiled by bureau officials five weeks later and never before made public, concluded that his identity “appeared to be based on his wealth, power and association with other high-profile individuals.”

“The lack of significant interpersonal connections, a complete loss of his status in both the community and among associates, and the idea of potentially spending his life in prison,” the post-mortem continued, “were likely factors contributing to Mr. Epstein’s suicide.” 

The Times obtained the materials after suing the Bureau of Prisons, which had repeatedly rejected its public-records requests. As part of a settlement, the agency agreed to turn over internal memos and emails, visitor logs, handwritten notes from inmates, and the psychological reconstruction of Epstein’s death. Many of the documents were heavily redacted; some were withheld entirely, including a number of records associated with the earlier suicide attempt.

If convicted, he faced up to 45 years in prison.

On the morning of Tuesday, July 9, Epstein underwent the requested formal, in-person suicide risk evaluation. The psychologist, whose name was redacted from the documents, found Epstein to be polite, cooperative, organized, coherent and even showing a sense of humor.

“Epstein adamantly denied any suicidal ideation, intention or plan,” she wrote in her notes. He requested a phone call, a meeting with his attorney, a shower and to brush his teeth.

Epstein described himself to her as a banker with a “big business” and said that “being alive is fun.” He denied having sexually abused anyone, and said he would have a renewed bail hearing the next week, where he believed he would be released.

“He was future-oriented,” the psychologist wrote. 

And the day after that, a psychologist wrote: “He was smirking and said, ‘Why would you ever think I would be suicidal? I am not suicidal and I would never be.’”

In conversations with people from psychological services over the next week, Epstein repeatedly denied having suicidal thoughts. He smiled and cracked jokes. He told them he was Jewish, and suicide was against his religion.

This prompted another suicide risk assessment by a psychologist. Epstein again denied having suicidal thoughts. The psychologist was persuaded, according to the documents, writing that a suicide watch was not warranted.

“He stated he lives for and plans to finish this case and to go back to his normal life,” the psychologist wrote.

Among the documents obtained by the Times was an undated sign, on orange paper, that read, “MANDATORY ROUNDS MUST BE CONDUCTED EVERY 30 MINUTES ON EPSTEIN #76318-054 AS PER GOD!!!! 

That evening, according to the reconstruction, a unit manager at the detention center helped Epstein make a “social” phone call. The manager dialed for Epstein and let him speak for 15 minutes. The call was not properly logged and does not appear to have been recorded. It is not clear from the documents whether the call was on a monitored line.

“I asked inmate Epstein who he was calling,” the unit manager wrote. “He stated his mother.”

Epstein’s mother died in 2004. The call was to his 30-year-old girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak, whom he helped put through dental school, said three people with knowledge of the phone conversation. Epstein, they said, gave no indication during the call that he planned to kill himself.

The call that night, however, was not included in the phone logs provided to the Times by the Bureau of Prisons. The logs show only one social call during his stay — more than a week earlier, on July 30, to Shuliak. 

About two months after Epstein’s death, an inmate who appears to have worked in the kitchen emailed the psychology department about a conversation he had with a man whose cell had been next to Epstein’s.

He said the other inmate had told him: “Jeffrey Epstein definitely killed himself. Any conspiracy theories to the contrary are ridiculous.” The man had heard Epstein “tearing up his sheet before committing suicide,” the kitchen worker wrote.

“He wanted to kill himself and seized the opportunity when it was available,” he added. “Such is life — or death, in this case.” 


All lies are a derivative of truth. When the truth has been compromised, so has reality. 

Epstein was adamant that he had no intentions on killing himself. Epstein was also a compulsive liar. 

The NYT had to sue the BOP to get the above cited withheld materials that were a matter of public record. Those materials were also "heavily redacted."

None of Epstein's phone calls (with the exception of one) were ever recorded. All jail phone calls are recorded. 

The AG stated the suicide was the result of a "perfect storm of screw ups." In other words, the "perfect storm" was a series of random coincidences. 

Once conspiracy theories began to surface, an inmate writes a letter confirming that Epstein really did kill himself and that the "conspiracy theories to the contrary are ridiculous." Inmates are opportunists who notoriously make deals with the system for leniency or favors. Again, an ironic coincidence that once conspiracy theories about Epstein's death became woven into the public narrative (2 months later), the inmate in the next cell tells another inmate who then writes a letter to staff stating that Epstein "definitely killed himself."

Ultimately, it doesn't matter if Epstein killed himself or not. He was a scumbag and everybody knew it. What matters is that nobody believes the mainstream narrative surrounding anything about Epstein. Most people (or most people who have an educated opinion on the matter) believe that Epstein was a Mossad operative running a blackmail scheme on elites. In fact, that's the reason most people are interested in Epstein to begin with. Otherwise, nobody would give a shit about Jeffrey Epstein in the first place.

Epstein knew from the beginning that when the gig was up, he had to go down with ship. By his hand, or another's is irrelevant. He lived the life of fame of fortune that he desperately craved for 66 years, and ultimately preserved his wealth. I suspect he went out "smirking." 

Consequently, this begs a couple of questions: Who took Epstein's position? And what will become of Ghislaine Maxwell?




 

 

Sunday, November 21, 2021

Sunday Scripture


John 18:33-37

33 So Pilate entered his headquarters again and called Jesus and said to him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” 34 Jesus answered, “Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?” 35 Pilate answered, “Am I a Jew? Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered you over to me. What have you done?” 36 Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” 37 Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.”


Monday, November 15, 2021

Fast Food Contains Sterilizing Plastics


https://scitechdaily.com/industrial-chemicals-linked-to-a-long-list-of-serious-health-problems-detected-in-us-fast-foods/


Chicken nuggets, burritos, and other popular items consumers buy from fast food outlets in the United States contain chemicals that are linked to a long list of serious health problems, according to a first-of-its-kind study published in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

Researchers at the George Washington University and their colleagues bought fast foods from popular outlets and found 10 of 11 potentially harmful chemicals in the samples, including phthalates, a group of chemicals that are used to make plastics soft and are known to disrupt the endocrine system. The research team also found other plasticizers, chemicals that are emerging as replacements to phthalates.

“We found phthalates and other plasticizers are widespread in prepared foods available at U.S. fast food chains, a finding that means many consumers are getting a side of potentially unhealthy chemicals along with their meal,” Lariah Edwards, lead author of the study and a postdoctoral scientist at GW, said. “Stronger regulations are needed to help keep these harmful chemicals out of the food supply.”

Previously, a GW research team led by Ami Zota, a professor of environmental and occupational health, looked at fast food consumption in a national survey and found people who reported eating more fast foods had higher levels of phthalates. No one has looked at the link between fast food and non-phthalate plasticizers, which are used in place of banned or restricted phthalates in food packaging and processing equipment.

In this study, Edwards, Zota and their colleagues purchased 64 fast food items from different restaurants and asked for three pairs of unused food handling gloves. The team tested food items and the gloves for 11 kinds of phthalates and plasticizers, finding that:

81% of the food samples studied contained a phthalate called DnBP and 70% contained DEHP. Both these chemicals have been linked in numerous studies to fertility and reproductive problems in humans. These phthalates can also increase risk for learning, attention, and behavioral disorders in childhood.

86% of the foods contained the replacement plasticizer known as DEHT, a chemical that needs further study to determine its impact on human health.

Foods containing meats, such as cheeseburgers and chicken burritos, had higher levels of the chemicals studied.

Chicken burritos and cheeseburgers had the highest levels of DEHT. The researchers noted that food handling gloves collected from the same restaurants also contained this chemical.

Cheese pizzas had the lowest levels of most chemicals tested.

Phthalates and replacement plasticizers are chemicals used to make plastics soft and can migrate out of plastics into the food, which is ingested. Some sources of plastics include food handling gloves, industrial tubing, food conveyor belts and the outer packaging used to wrap fast food meals available in restaurants. 

The study also raises the concern that certain racial/minority groups may be disproportionately affected by these chemicals.

“Disadvantaged neighborhoods often have plenty of fast food outlets, but limited access to healthier foods like fruits and vegetables,” Zota said. “Additional research needs to be done to find out whether people living in such food deserts are at higher risk of exposure to these harmful chemicals.” 


Remember, kids: They care about you. That's why they include potential sterilizing plastics in the food that has become synonymous with American culture. 

Just like when they encourage social distancing, yet set curfews so the time frame that people can socially distance is actually decreased. 

Or when they force you to either get an injection you don't want, or lose your job. They really don't want you to be homeless or hungry, they just want you to comply for your own good. They know what's better for you than you do. And if you don't believe that, then you've been exposed to misinformation on social media. 

You just have to follow the science! Or the scientific method. Well, actually just the scientific narrative, which has nothing to do with science and everything to do with the narrative.

Isn't it also a bit strange that "food deserts" are inundated with fast food restaurants? Whatever scientist wrote this article is obviously racist. To insinuate that non-whites have plenty of fast food options, but no grocery stores is a little disingenuous. What the scientist is really alluding too is that non-whites would rather eat fast food than healthy food. And that's racist!

The correlation with poor people and poor diets is common sense. You don't have to be a big brained scientist to know that. It's directly attributed to impulse control. Those who can't manage their finances well, probably aren't going to be very good at managing their diets, either. 

Here's a novel idea: maybe those who have to depend on the government for food should only be given healthy food. Or just the food necessary for survival. Like potatoes, rice and beans. And produce that is going to be thrown away by retailers, and instead donated to hungry people. Then poor non-whites won't be forced to eat plastic cheeseburgers. Besides, beggars can't be choosers.



 



Sunday, November 7, 2021

Sunday Scripture:




Galatians 2:20-21

I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.  

Thursday, November 4, 2021

Most Vaccinated State (VT) Has Record Number of COVID Cases. But How?

 


https://vtdigger.org/2021/11/04/vermont-reports-record-setting-487-covid-19-cases/


The 487 new Covid-19 cases reported Thursday by the Vermont Department of Health breaks the record for a one-day case total by more than 100 cases.

The spike comes after a lull of mixed case numbers, where the seven-day average wavered between 200 and 220 cases per day. Now, with Thursday’s big bump, the seven-day average has risen to 247 cases per day.

The last time Vermont shattered its previous one-day case total — with 330 cases on Sept. 15 — the health department blamed the number on a computer error that artificially delayed test results.

But this time, “the numbers are accurate and there are no associated glitches or delays,” department spokesperson Ben Truman confirmed via email. 


Vermont is the most vaccinated state (81% of those eligible are vaccinated) and have broken their previous record for number of cases by more than a 100. 

I wonder how anyone capable of rational thought could read this data and still have "vaccine hesitancy." If they do, it's obviously just from "misinformation" they read on Gab.

One would assume the "misinformation" angle would be, "yea, but it's all the unvaccinated people's fault. If everybody got the vaccine then COVID would go away." 

But, how can you make that argument when there are more cases now than pre-vax? And not just more, but 2.5x more?

Let's do a simple thinking exercise: 

If 80% of the population were vaccinated what result would be most likely: 

a. cases decrease by 80%

b. cases increase by 250%

 


People began taking the vaccine in mid-Dec. At that time, the rolling 7-day average was 105/100k (and that was in the peak of the pandemic). It takes 5 weeks to be fully protected by the 2-shot full-dose. By that time (Feb 1) the rolling average was 135/100k (again, peak winter and peak of the pandemic). Fast forward to today (Nov 3) and that average is now up to 247/100k (late fall with 80% vaxed almost 2 years into the pandemic). And it's all because 20% of the population didn't take a couple of injections.

How could anyone think that?

And yet, many do:








 

Sunday, October 31, 2021

Sunday Scripture:

 


Romans 4:7-8

Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,

and whose sins are covered;

blessed is the man against whom the 

Lord will not count his sin.

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Who are the Experts: Censorship Creates Misinformation


 https://www.eatthis.com/news-doctor-jha-critical-covid-warning/



These next few months will be key ones during the coronavirus pandemic, as cases ebb—but remain at jaw-dopping numbers as we head into colder weather. How can you stay safe and what should you expect going into the chill? Dr. Ashish Jha, Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, tweeted six key points that everyone should hear, no matter your opinions. Read on for all six—and to ensure your health and the health of others, don't miss these Sure Signs You've Already Had COVID....


For the sake of the reader, I'm not going to list the "six key points that everyone should hear, no matter your opinions" given by the "virus expert." If you want to read them, click the cited link.  

The point-of-interest is that the article has even been "fact checked" to ensure that the "opinions" of the "virus expert" comply with the systemic narrative. 

It's pertinent to understand what "fact checked" for "misinformation" actually means. It has nothing to do with facts. It just means that it complies with the narrative; the "facts" are irrelevant. 

If you want to examine the "facts," lets start with the credentials of the article's cited "virus expert": His name is Ashish Kumar Jsa. Here are his "virus expert" credentials, via his Wiki page:

Ashish Kumar Jha (born December 31, 1970) is an Indian American general internist physician and academic serving as Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. Previously, he was a health scholar, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the Faculty Director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, and a Senior Advisor at Albright Stonebridge Group. Jha is recognized as one of the leading health policy scholars in the nation.

Jha's research centers on improving the quality and cost of health care, focusing on the impact of public health policy.

"Jha is recognized as one of the leading health policy scholars in the nation." 

You might ask, "What is a 'health policy scholar'? Is that like another name for "virus expert"? Here is what Wiki says:

Health policy can be defined as the "decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a society". According to the World Health Organization, an explicit health policy can achieve several things: it defines a vision for the future; it outlines priorities and the expected roles of different groups; and it builds consensus and informs people.

Still nothing about Jha's virus expertise. Let's continue to look at his career and education:

Jha graduated from Boonton High School in Boonton, New Jersey as the valedictorian of the class of 1988 and then attended Columbia University. He graduated from Columbia in 1992 with a B.A. in economics. Jha received his M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1997 and then trained as a resident in internal medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. He completed a Chief Residency year at UCSF. Between 2001 and 2002, he served as the Inaugural Under Secretary's Special Fellow for Quality and Safety in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jha returned to Boston in 2002 to complete his fellowship in general medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.

In 2004, Jha completed his Master of Public Health degree at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 

Jha worked as the K.T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the Faculty Director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, as well as a Senior Advisor at Albright Stonebridge Group. On September 1, 2020, he became the Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health

In my humble opinion, the facts make Jha look like a career student. 

Nothing I read said anything about virology, immunology or epidemiology. 

Nothing I read would make me think "virus expert." 

Sure, he's probably a smart guy and has a lot of college degrees, but there is nothing with regards to work history that even shows he has ever worked as a doctor (unless you want to count residency and internships, which are pre-reqs for degrees).

He doesn't have a degree in virology, or epidemiology. He's a general internist. Which means he's a family physician who doesn't see children. 

Q: I’m looking for a primary care doctor. What’s the difference between an internist and a family physician?

A: Internists are specialty-trained to treat adults from 18 years old through the geriatric years. They have intensive and comprehensive training in all aspects of adult medical care. Internists specialize in primary care screening and in treating common adult problems, such as diabetes and hypertension, as well as in treating patients with a complex combination of conditions.

Family medicine doctors are specialty-trained to care for people across the lifespan, from birth through the geriatric years. Family medicine doctors have formal training in pediatrics, adult medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, mental health and more. This broad training equips them to deal with a wide range of health problems for the entire family, with a focus on wellness, disease prevention and chronic disease management.

Jha is basically your family doctor who can't see kids, a career student and a consultant. 

To classify him as a "virus expert" is misinformation. 


Sunday, October 24, 2021

Sunday Scripture:

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me



Romans 3:10-11:

as it is written:

None is righteous, no, not one;

no one understands;

no one seeks for God.

Friday, October 22, 2021

The Mantra: Anti-Racist = Anti-White


Hypoocrisy always has an agenda: It's usually hate.



ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


Whites have been demoralized by wordism.

Wordism is the concept of using language to moralize and manipulate, as opposed to communicate. 

The most effective word in the wordism arsenal is racist.

Racist is effective because it's a weaponized epithet. Therefore it holds power as a label.

The "R word" (as it should be known) is the "N word" for White people.

In liberal utopianism, hurling epithets based on an identity is immoral.

In liberal utopianism, feelings establish the moral high ground. 

In liberal utopianism, equality is the god of the godless.

Equality only works if all things are equal.

Racism is a zero-sum game, because racism begets racism.

Hypocrisy always has an agenda, and it's usually hate.

The "N words" in liberal utopianism are now the "R words."

Because.....

Liberal utopianism isn't anti-racist, it's just anti-white.