Sunday, August 14, 2022

Sunday Psalm


Psalm 75:1-10

We thank you, O God!

We give thanks because you are near.

People everywhere tell of your mighty miracles.

God says, "At the time I have planned,

I will bring justice against the wicked.

When the earth quakes and its people live in turmoil,

I am the one who keeps its foundations firm.

I warned the proud, 'Stop your boasting!'

I told the wicked, 'Don't raise your fists!

Don't lift your fists in defiance at the heavens

or speak with rebellious arrogance.'"

For no one on earth - from east or west, 

or even from the wilderness - 

can raise another person up.

It is God alone who judges;

he decides who will rise and who will fall.

For the LORD holds a cup in his hand;

it is full of foaming wine mixed with spices.

He pours the wine out in judgement,

and all the wicked must drink it,

draining it to the dregs.

But as for me, I will always proclaim what God has done;

I will sing praises to the God of Jacob.

For God says, "I will cut off the strength of the wicked,

but I will increase the power of the godly."


Friday, August 12, 2022

Guess Why Scientians Say Americans Don't Want Griner Back?


https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientific-reason-why-americans-dont-145431580.html


Some Americans are rooting against Brittney Griner's return home to the United States.

The WNBA superstar was arrested in February after customs agents at Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport said they found vape cartridges containing hashish oil in her luggage. She was found guilty of drug smuggling in early August and sentenced to nine years in a Russian prison.

Given the timing of her detainment, the nature of her alleged offense, and the reputation of Russian courts, Griner is widely considered to be a political pawn that Moscow is using as leverage against the United States. As such, the State Department classified Griner as wrongfully detained in May.

Even despite the "strong signal that the US government does not believe that there is a legitimate case against her," as an expert previously told Insider, many of the two-time Olympic gold medalist's compatriots are opposed to the Biden administration's efforts to secure her freedom through negotiating a prisoner exchange with the Kremlin.

And there could be a scientific explanation to why they've sided with a foreign adversary instead of supporting their fellow American.

Dani Gilbert, an expert on hostage taking and recovery and a Rosenwald Fellow in US Foreign Policy and International Security at Dartmouth College's John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding, told Insider that her research suggests that "how someone came to be in need of assistance affects whether or not the public thinks that person should receive it."

This phenomenon, she said, is called the "deservingness heuristic."

Gilbert further explained that personal characteristics could have an effect on the way the public regards Griner's situation: Though "gender tends to be less influential in how the American public and how the media care about, sympathize with, pay attention to Americans who are held hostage abroad" than some other factors, "race is a huge deal here."

This concept is aptly called "the missing white woman syndrome," Gilbert said.

"A white girl or a white woman who is taken captive or arrested or something like that elicits tons of sympathy from the American public in a way that women and girls of color do not," she explained. Gilbert believed that the fact that Griner is Black "could be a huge part of the lack of attention to her case."

"And then there are other demographic characteristics, including the fact that she is openly gay, that she is gender nonconforming, not traditionally feminine — all of these work against public sympathy for someone in her position," Gilbert added.


Science! really is something, isn't it?

And Scientians wonder why so many people don't believe in their dogma.

While the above "scientific explanation" is just typical anti-white rhetoric, lets analyze it rationally.

This idea that Russians "said" they found drugs is absolutely silly. It was on video. From what I know, she didn't even deny it, she just claimed that she had a medical card. Most people understand that if you try to smuggle illegal contraband into a foreign country, that there are consequences. There are people of all nationalities all over the world who are sitting in jails for the same reason. Why aren't they "wrongfully detained"?

Griner has been openly racist (anti-white) and publicly expressed anti-American sentiments. Most normal Americans don't like racists and people who hate America. That's pretty self-explanatory. Scientians call that "deservingness heuristic," normal people call it "common sense."

And, of course, the Scientians can't have a theory without somehow expressing their anti-white hatred. So, when a black person gets caught doing something, it's not because they don't have any agency. It's because white people used black people to pick cotton in the 1700s. But if they want to play the, "ohhhh, if it was a white person who got caught smuggling drugs she would already be home" card, consider this: how many Americans that have been convicted of smuggling drugs into foreign countries are white? Furthermore, what if Griner was a white supremacist? Would anyone want to bring her home, or would she be considered "wrongfully detained?" What if she was a diehard MAGA supporter? Would we even be having this conversation?

The fact of the matter is that she broke the law and got caught. It takes a pretty dumb person to smuggle drugs into a foreign country. Most people recognize that and just don't have much sympathy for it. Not too mention that one of the primary tenets of Scientians is #gayblackprivilege, which normal Americans don't believe in.

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Is College A Scam?



"Scam" isn't the word I would use to describe what college is. I'd lean more towards "indoctrination centers."

The way they become "indoctrination centers" is with the idea that if you don't go to college you're going to be a loser. Thus, every loving parent will take out a 2nd mortgage on the house to send their child to college. Or students will take on massive amounts of debt in the form of student loan (one of the only forms of debt that you can't default on). Oddly, people have to jump through hoops to get any kind of loan, but student loans are guaranteed to every student who wants one. That's how serious the money lenders are about their ideology.

(Note: Money and power are the most important things to the ruling class. They only make sacrifices with money when it coincides with increases in power.)

Certain career fields require education (doctors, engineers, lawyers, etc), but most don't. 

In 3D theory, those who attend college for liberal arts or history degrees are just wasting time and accumulating debt. In 4D theory, they're being indoctrinated with liberal ideology. 


The establishment is comprised of four entities, that all work hand-in-hand: politics, academia, finance, information systems/media.

The purpose of college, outside of acquiring the education needed to pursue a career, is to challenge ideas. In other words, if you're not there to be a doctor, you're there to either be enlightened or indoctrinated.

If you think college is a institution of enlightenment, attend one and be openly critical about liberal ideas. Say something negative on campus about anything that is aligned with the core of the radical liberal ideology. Better yet, say something pro-white and let us know how the exchange of ideas works out for you.

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

#WhiteChristiansMatter


https://www.yahoo.com/news/rejecting-christian-nationalism-jesus-083840366.html 


In 1915, the Ku Klux Klan found revival at Stone Mountain in Georgia in a ceremony that included a U.S. flag and a Holy Bible placed on an altar before a burning cross.

More than a century later, today’s generation of white supremacists are following in their political ancestors’ footsteps, explicitly and proudly embracing the label of “Christian nationalist.” Some are even going so far as to sell merch, with Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) hawking “exclusive” shirts emblazoned with “Proud Christian Nationalist.”

Even before she began advertising the shirts on Instagram with the call to stand against the “Godless Left,” Greene told an interviewer that the Republican Party needs “ to be the party of nationalism and I’m a Christian, and I say it proudly, we should be Christian nationalists.”

It’s not the first time she has embraced the label. And it’s a dangerous turn of events that requires active, loud opposition from all of us, especially from American Christians, for whom Greene and her allies claim to speak.

As a pastor, if there’s one thing I understand, it’s that Christian nationalism is unchristian and unpatriotic. Academic researchers define the authoritarian ideology as a political worldview—not a religion—that unconstitutionally and unbiblically merges Christian and American identities, declaring that democracy does not matter because America is a “Christian nation” where only conservative Christians count as true Americans.

If there’s any doubt that this is the heart of Christian nationalism, consider these two examples. First, last fall former Trump aide Michael Flynn stood in a Texas megachurch known for its antisemitic pastor and told a crowd chanting “Let’s Go Brandon” that America should have only “one religion.” Then only last month, America First Legal—whose board includes top Trump allies Stephen Miller and Mark Meadows—issued a statement asking the Supreme Court to let the 50 states create official state churches and “establish religion within their borders,” claiming that the First Amendment only applies to the federal government.

The clear goal of Christian nationalism is to seize power only for its mostly white evangelical and conservative Catholic followers, no matter who else gets hurt or how many elections have to be overturned. This is the unholy force that incited the failed coup of Jan. 6, 2021, brought us the recent spate of theocratic Supreme Court opinions, and has inspired multiple wave upon wave of dangerous misinformation about elections, climate change, and COVID-19—all in direct contrast to Jesus’ teachings of love, truth, and the common good.

Whether they speak from the halls of power or the front of a sanctuary, Rep. Greene and her ilk know exactly what they are doing when they so proudly embrace the label of Christian nationalist. Each explicit declaration of Christian nationalism is a blatant attempt to pull the wool over people’s eyes and make the anti-democracy extremist ideology seem safe and more palatable, distracting us from the right’s project of seizing power to remake America into a theocracy in their image—a nation where the LGBTQ community, people of color, and non-Christians all lose rights while evangelicals and conservative Catholics are put permanently in charge.


Keep in mind that this is a Christian pastor that is writing this. He would much rather see a country ran by the "Godless Left" than one by white Christians. Is that weird to you?

This "pastor" is more worried about the "rights" of gays, atheists and blacks than he is about white Christians. How does that make any sense?

What about the "rights" of white Christians? Why don't they matter?

A Christian pastor rejecting the concept of a Christian nation would be like homosexuals taking flamboyant pride in their voluntary elimination of the gene pool.


I wonder if the good pastor would have an issue with Christian Nationalism if it were spearheaded by black lives matter. Or by feminists. Or homosexuals.

Yahoo is essentially an anti-white tabloid, so the fact that they are running this pastor's critiques of Christian Nationalism (2nd article they have posted of his in the last week) shouldn't be surprising. But the language he uses in his critiques made me suspect that he wasn't the average Christian pastor. I assumed he was homosexual, or perhaps Jewish. Thus, I decided to look him up:

The Rev. Nathan Empsall is a justice-focused Christian organizer, the executive director of Faithful America, the founding editor of Episcopal Climate News, a priest associate at an Episcopal parish in New Haven, CT, and a member of the Episcopal Church’s Task Force on Care of Creation and Environmental Racism.

Rev. Nathan’s motto is “God loves you. Accept it, and spread it!” For Rev. Nathan, “spreading love” means focusing his ministry on social, environmental, economic, and racial justice. We love the victims of oppression and discrimination as Jesus loves them by doing everything we can to lift up and echo their voices, end that oppression and discrimination, and create space for healing. As the Mother of Christ sang, God “has brought down the powerful from their thrones, and lifted up the lowly; he has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the rich away empty.”

Rev. Nathan affirms the equality and God-given dignity of all LGBTQ persons, and believes that no one can truthfully say all lives matter until we have achieved a society where Black lives matter.

Apparently, the pastor loves everyone.... except white Christians who advocate for a Christian society. Or those who reject climate change, diversity, homosexuality, BLM, feminism, abortion and/or the godless left.

It doesn't surprise me that he is Episcopalian. I attended an Episcopal church once. The pastor was reading scripture from the new testament. He was reading the very words of Jesus. In those words Jesus was critical of Jews, so the pastor censored that part.

It's not up to me judge people's souls. But I find it hard to believe that Jesus would leave us his word and want it censored by those who claim to represent him. The term used to describe that is blasphemy. 

Nathan Empsall isn't just an anti-white hypocrite; he's a blasphemer, too. 

Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Monday, August 8, 2022

Planetary Saviorism is the God-Complex of White Supremacy


https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/climate-hazards-are-turning-218-diseases-bigger-threats-rcna41631 


Professor Camilo Mora feels the impacts of climate change in his knees. 

During a 2014 visit to his native Colombia, heavy rains caused the worst flooding his hometown had seen in decades and boosted the mosquito population. A mosquito bit Mora, transferring the chikungunya virus and making him a patient during an unprecedented outbreak in the region. 

His joints ache still today. He blames a warming world. 

In a study published Monday, Mora and his colleagues at the University of Hawaii canvassed tens of thousands of studies to analyze the global impacts of climate change on infectious diseases that affect humans. They determined that nearly 220 infectious diseases — 58% of the total studied — had become bigger threats because of climate hazards.  

“Systems have been evolving for millions of years and now humans have come along and changed things,” Mora said. “We are punching nature, but nature is punching us back.” 

“It’s only in the recent past of infectious disease research that we really focus in on climate change as a driver of infectious disease,” said Jessica Leibler, an environmental epidemiologist at the Boston University School of Public Health who wasn't involved in the research.

Fifty-eight percent “seems like a really high number,” she said, “but it reflects the reality that infectious diseases are driven by what’s going on in our environment.”

The research is not without limitations. Scientists often have a hard time quantifying how much climate change is contributing to disease outbreaks, since it’s an indirect process. 

Climate hazards also diminished some impacts of infectious disease. For 16% of diseases, these hazards reduced the ailments’ impact or produced mixed results.


Planetary Saviorism is a by-product of white supremacy.

After white people went into Africa and gave Africans injections and clean water to drink, the natural progression was saving the planet.

White supremacy in action just means making everyone act white. So while Africans were evolved to live in the jungles and act like primitive people, white supremacists wanted to bypass evolution and teach black people how to be white. So they inject them with serums, give them shoes and teach them how to drink water that animals don't shit in.

The odd thing about white supremacy is that white supremacists always denounce racism and/or white supremacy. They think teaching black people how to be white is actually saving them from being black. I know it sounds weird, but they're incapable of objective reasoning, so they do weird stuff. Like getting sick from a mosquito bite and blaming black people for throwing garbage into the ocean. Btw, there wouldn't be any plastic in the ocean if it weren't for white supremacy, either.

So now that all of the black people have been saved, the next evolution of white supremacy is planetary saviorism (i.e., saving the planet). So they manufacture a crisis (like they did with skinny black people in Africa), and declare themselves the saviors of world. 

They theorize that humanity is making the temperature hotter. Even though the weather has fluctuated since the beginning of time. They assume this fluctuation is from various forms of pollution. They make weird claims that nobody believes. Ultimately they are depopulationists

The odd thing about it is that the only people concerned with the climate are white people (specifically, single white women). Yet, white people only make up about 10% of the earth's population. So if you were to calculate the effect on the climate demographically, you would find that white people have the least impact on the climate per capita. In other words, the innovations of white people that have been implemented in the black and brown world are much more problematic in terms of pollution than they are in white countries. 

So the strategy of the planetary saviorists is to tell a small group of people who produce a very small percentage of pollution to eat bugs and walk everywhere, while ignoring the 90% that produce the majority of pollution, because that would be racist. 

If planetary saviorists were successful in their manufactured crises, that would mean that 10% of the population quits producing pollution. Even though there isn't any way to prove that pollution is actually increasing the temperature of the earth. 

See how silly this is?

If planetary saviorists were serious about their mission they would quit forcing white supremacy (democracy, capitalism, Science!, plastic, consumerism, etc) down the throats of non-white people. That would eliminate about 80% of the world's pollution.  

Friday, August 5, 2022

We Are All Sinners; Christians Just Acknowledge It


https://www.yahoo.com/news/love-them-god-says-why-144354328.html 


Recently I wrote a column about what it might look like if those who profess their Christian faith spent less time harrumphing about it and more time attempting to imitate the Jesus they claim to follow.

Having spent the past 40-plus years preaching and writing about the good news as it’s put forth in the New Testament — our faith’s foundational text — I’ve concluded Christianity’s overriding message is: “Love them all.”

Jesus said God’s commandments were: love God with all your heart, and love other people as much as yourself. That’s it.

He, St. Paul and the other New Testament writers repeatedly reinforced this principle.

St. Paul: Even if I’m a prophet who knows all mysteries, even if I can move mountains with my faith, but I’m not consumed by love, then I’m just a noisy, clanging gong.

St. John: The one who doesn’t walk in love doesn’t know God, because God is love.

If you read the New Testament, you can’t miss this principle, unless you’re trying to miss it.

Which raises obvious questions: Why do Christians so routinely miss it? Why do we—and by “we,” I mean nearly all of us—fail to obey the gospel’s very foundation?


That answer is simple: we are all sinners!

The author of this post surmises that, "oh, if you were really a Christian why wouldn't you act like one? God is clear on his message, and it's such an easy thing to do."

Well... if it were so easy, then God wouldn't have made it his principle message, now would he?

The implication of Christianity isn't the equivalent of selling ice to Eskimos in the arctic. 

Why has there only been one perfect person in the history of humanity? Have you ever noticed that nobody even claims to be perfect? Even the most devout atheist doesn't claim perfection. 

The fall of man (when Eve was seduced by Satan in the garden of Eden) is responsible for our sinful nature. In fact, our sinful nature is the essence of the human condition. It literally is what we are.

The answer to why Christians can't just love everyone as they are commanded by God is so simple it's silly: we are sinners. Christians recognize their sinful nature, and feel shame for it. But this is why God sent his only Son into the world: To die on the cross for the shame of your sins. 

Christians desire to be better. To do better. They feel bad about their nature. They seek forgiveness. But, they know they will always succumb to what they are: sinners.

The question shouldn't be, "Why are Christians sinners?" The question should be, "Why aren't sinners Christians?" Those who don't feel shame for their sinful nature is much more intriguing than why Christians are sinners.

To be Christian is to have shame for what you are. To acknowledge your nature. To try to be better. We will all fall short in the eyes of God. But he knows our hearts.

Luke 16:15 Then he said to them, "You like to look good in public, but God knows your evil hearts.

Thursday, August 4, 2022

#GayBlackPrivilege is the Product of American Exceptionalism


https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/04/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-the-sentencing-of-wrongfully-detained-american-brittney-griner/


Today, American citizen Brittney Griner received a prison sentence that is one more reminder of what the world already knew: Russia is wrongfully detaining Brittney. It’s unacceptable, and I call on Russia to release her immediately so she can be with her wife, loved ones, friends, and teammates.  My administration will continue to work tirelessly and pursue every possible avenue to bring Brittney and Paul Whelan home safely as soon as possible.


This is the leader of the free world (or someone that represents him) saying that someone who entered a country with illegal drugs is being "wrongfully detained." 

I mean, there have been a lot (and I mean A LOT) of idiotic comments made by the current administration, but this is just beyond the pale of absurdity. Basically this just opens the door to say that every prisoner in the world is being "wrongfully detained." 

The level of hypocrisy is stunning.

How many Americans are being "wrongfully detained" in the USA for getting caught with illegal drugs?

How many foreigners are being "wrongfully detained" in American prisons for entering the USA with illegal drugs?

Have any leaders of foreign countries ever publicly accused America of "wrongfully detaining" someone caught breaking an American law?

Furthermore, anyone entering a foreign country knows that if you try to smuggle drugs into the country that you're taking a huge risk. How many people all over the world are sitting in prisons for entering a country with illegals drugs? I bet that number is easily in the thousands, if not tens-of-thousands. Are they being "wrongfully detained," or is this just anti-Russian propaganda? 

People who fall for this type of rhetoric are really low IQ morons. Imagine being someone who is like, "Yea, that tall gay black sportsball player who got caught on camera trying to smuggle pot into Russia is being 'wrongfully detained,' because even though she was caught red-headed breaking Russian law, Russia is 'wrongfully detaining' her because she is gay and black."

I would speculate there are several thousand Russians in American prisons. I would also speculate there are several Americans in Russian prisons. Why do we only hear about the gay, black ballplayer? Is it because she is too stupid to know that it's illegal to smuggle drugs into other countries? Or is because she has #gayblackprivilege and gay-black people are above the law?

That's probably what is meant by "wrongfully detained." She is gay and black and in America that gives you a free pass to do anything you want without repercussion. So she didn't realize that when she went to Russia with illegal drugs that should couldn't just say, "ey yo, I'm gay and black. You can't arrest me or I'll accuse you of homophobic racism, and then we loot!"

To add more to the irony, Griner also hates America, which is the only place that recognizes her #gayblackprivilege.  

Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction