Wednesday, April 29, 2015

The Exasperated General

In a shooting war, you succeed by gaining fire superiority. In a propaganda war, you succeed by gaining propaganda superiority.  In our case, anyone calling us “Nazi racist bigot KKK supremacist!” is shooting at us. If someone is shooting at you, what is your top priority? What if you were being shot at and the soldiers in the foxholes wanted to worry about everything BUT shooting back? Wouldn’t that be kind of crazy? Nevertheless, that’s exactly what Anti Mantra Pro Whites (AMPW’s) do.
White genocide is being carried out by mass non-white immigration plus forced assimilation backed by psychological warfare. Until we gain propaganda superiority, talking, worrying, writing, thinking about anything else, whether it be crime, Islam, Jews or any other red herring is largely a waste of time. If you say we can never compete with big media, remember: most of our enemies’ propaganda is lies. We’re telling the truth. The truth is a force multiplier beyond reckoning. Plus, we own the internet.
If we analogize our situation to a shooting war, it might look somethifrench_mutineer_shot2-300x150ng like the following conversation. Of course, the analogy cannot be perfect. There is no equivalent to an AMPW in a shooting war. If the equivalent of an AMPW showed up in a shooting war, he would be shot or court-martialed in about 5 minutes.
The Exasperated GeneralGeneral picks up the phone.
AMPW: “Sir, the enemy is firing artillery at us!”
General: “Well, fire back.”
AMPW: “Sir, we think they are using a new alloy in the shell casings.”
General: “Fine, whatever, are you firing back yet?”
AMPW: “Sir, now they’re shooting bullets at us! From rifles!”
General: “Well, shoot back!”
AMPW: “Sir, we’re trying to find out if it’s blacks, browns, Muslims, Jews, or white traitors firing at us.”
General: “What difference does it make? Shoot back!”
AMPW: “Sir, I’m trying to figure out why they are shooting at us. It is very important to know WHY they are shooting at us.”
General: “For heaven’s sake, who cares? Shoot back. Defend yourselves.”
AMPW: “Sir, I’m writing a 3,000 word essay proving that everyone manning the enemy artillery pieces is a Jew. Once every white person has read this essay, the shells will magically stop exploding.”
General: (Shakes head) “Anything else?”
AMPW: “Sir, these are real bad people shooting at us after we’ve been so nice to them.”
General: “I agree, so why don’t you stop complaining and shoot back?”
AMPW: “Sir, they’ve taken Hill 209! They’re so mean.”
General: “Well, what do you expect? Take it back!”
AMPW: “Sir, the enemy has all the high ground. It’s so unfair!”
General: “Well, you gave it to them. Take it back.”
AMPW: “Sir, we invented artillery! What will they do after we’re gone?”
General: “That’s their problem. What difference does it make if WE’RE gone? Shoot back!”
AMPW: “Sir, why don’t we just run away?”
General: “Because they’ll chase you down. You can’t run away from this fight.”
AMPW: “Sir, after exhaustive reconnaissance, we’ve discovered a handful of browns, blacks, and Jews who agree that our enemies are really bad people who should stop firing at us.”
General: “Uh, OK, so what? Shoot the enemy!”
AMPW: “Sir, some of the enemies’ shells are landing on non-whites!”
General: “In any battle there’s going to be friendly fire. That doesn’t help us. Shoot!”
AMPW: “Sir, a lot of the people shooting at us look like us. It doesn’t make any sense.”
General: “Treason never makes sense, but it happens. Shoot back!”
AMPW: “Sir, after they’ve defeated us they’re going to attack other people! They have a larger agenda!”
General: “That may be, but so what? Shoot back!”
AMPW: “Sir, last week the men thought it was the Illuminati leading the attack on us. But now they’re sure it is the Jesuits! I thought it was very important to inform you of this development. And I think it is wonderful that our men put so much thought and effort into this sort of thing.”
General: “Are you shooting back yet?”
AMPW: “Sir, the men have informed me that shooting back will never work and is a waste of time. They would much rather complain like 5 year old children.”
General: “Do the men know that if they don’t shoot back they will be exterminated?”
AMPW: “Sir, the men say shooting back is un-Aryan. They are too dignified to fight like our enemies. They want to engage in single combat only with axes and broadswords.”
General: “You have to fight the battle in front of you with the weapons you have.”
AMPW: “Sir, the men and I have agreed: our enemies’ actions are unconstitutional! If we just gobacktotheconstitution everything will be fine.”
General: “So, when you explain this they’re just going to stop firing? What is your point?”
AMPW: “Sir, one of our scouts reports he has seen an enemy with sidelocks!”
General: (face palm)
AMPW: “Sir, the enemy are a secret society!”
General: (double face palm)
AMPW: “Sir, we’ve discovered the enemy are Marxists!”
General: (double face palm head shaking)
AMPW: “Sir, we lost the war a long time ago.”
AMPW: “Sir, the men don’t like our weapons. And they think we should fight somewhere else.”
AMPW: “Sir, the enemies are Satanic!”
General puts down the phone and reaches for a bottle…
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Perception of Racial Protectionism

In psychological warfare, words are the weaponry of choice, which when used effectively, invoke emotion and shape public perception. The problem that often arises in psychological warfare, is once certain words are deemed effective on compassionate Caucasians (always the target), an onslaught ensues. However, when perpetually firing the same words over-and-over again, they eventually lose their effectiveness, and to an extent, they also lose their meaning. A perfect example of this is the word “racism” (and it's big brother, “racist”). The word “racist” is the character assassin of the SJWs, and has more kills than Chris Kyle ever dreamed of. However, even the targeted herd is beginning to understand that the colorblind bomb is only hurled in one direction – at Whites. This premise doesn't coexist with the egalitarian worldview, it coincides with hypocrisy, and my hypocrisy hypothesis states that hypocrisy always has an agenda - usually ignorance and/or hatred!

Words represent concepts, and concepts evolve just as their purveyors do. The word “racism” isn't the exception to this rule, as what once was a word with a simple meaning (racial superiority/inferiority), has now become this overfed chameleon. This word now represents a concept, a system, an ideology, a scapegoat – a demoralizing epithet with a gluttonous anti-White appetite. An exemplary insight into this phenomenon can be read in a recent article published in the Washington Post: “Racism in schools is pushing more black families to homeschool their children - Eurocentric school curricula continues to prevail in a society that is increasingly brown.”

The article is written by Ama Mazama (born Marie-Josée Cerol in Guadeloupe), a Mambo (female high priest in the voodoo religion in Haiti) who teaches African Studies at Temple University. In this piece she claims that homeschooling is becoming more popular among African American kids, but for reasons different than that of White kids. The reason? “My research shows that black parents homeschool their children due to white racism.” She goes on to say:

This may come as a surprise since, for many, we live in an age of alleged color blindness and post-racialism, characterized by the declining significance of race and racism. My research found strong evidence to suggest that racism is far from being a thing of the past. I found covert institutional racism and individual racism still persist and are largely responsible for the persistence of profound racial disparities and inequalities in many social realms. Schools, of course, are no exception, which helps one understand why racism is such a powerful drive for black homeschoolers.”

As I initially stated, firing weaponized words over-and-over again takes away their effectiveness, and with it, much of the credibility of the accuser. This redundant theme is unsubstantiated, whereas she claims “strong evidence” of “covert institutional racism and individual racism,” yet anyone with a pea-sized brain knows within the realm of the current anti-White establishment, any “strong evidence” of “covert institutional,” and especially “individual” racism would have dire consequences for the perpetrators of said “racism.” As is common with SJWs, they assume that “disparities and inequalities” are always systemic, and never innate. With that logic, it would be accurate to conclude that those of non-African ancestry have had inferior track coaches and that's why they don't hold any world running records.

Mazama's “research” (interviewing 74 African American homeschooled families in 2010) has provided the analysis for her conclusion, but she does admit that, “While the size of my sample does not allow me to claim that it is representative of the whole African-American homeschooling population, it was nonetheless large enough to allow me to capture the main reasons why black parents tend to homeschool their children.”

In one of her sources there is a plethora of reasons why parents opt to homeschool their children, although unlike Mazama's sample, the source isn't racially exclusive. Mazama paints the narrative that African American homeschoolers are reactionary victims, while all other families who homeschool are proactive educators. This narrative is consistent with Nietzsche's “Master-Slave Morality,” in which the master morality weighs actions on a scale of good or bad consequences, whereas the slave morality weighs actions on a scale of good or evil intentions. Mazama isn't attempting to break the cycle, she is reinforcing it.

She abruptly shifts gears and says that: “When it comes to schools, there are at least two important areas of concern: the curriculum and teachers’ attitudes and behaviors.” She says the schools continue to teach a curriculum consistent with a Western civilization worldview. Now, maybe I'm wrong here, but is the United States not the epitome of Western civilization? Is her argument that since our society is becoming “increasingly brown,” we are no longer a part of the Western world and should abandon all things representative of Western civilization? Replacing Eurocentrism with Afrocentrism – because even though our country still has a White majority, it just seems like the fair thing to do?

To support her argument that “Eurocentric orientation..speaks volumes about a pervasive European Ethnocentrism,” she cites a White woman named Peggy McIntosh. Ms Peggy is most notably recognized for her 1988 essay “White Privilege and Male Privilege” (she didn't coin the term “White Privilege,” but her essay resurrected it and thrust it into the SJW's arsenal) in which she compares “White Privilege” to an “invisible knapsack” full of “special provisions” such as “blank checks, visas, maps, passports, etc.” I could write a full article on Ms Peggy, but to avoid straying from topic, just keep in mind that her relevance as a reference for Mazama's article is that she's an anti-White feminist.

Mazama addresses racial stereotypes that she says harms black kids. Ironically, in condemning stereotypes, her article describes White teachers, “as overly critical, unresponsive, unqualified, insensitive, offensive, mean, hypocritical, and using double standards. Indeed, many white teachers seem to bring into the schools the many racist stereotypes and attitudes that have been ingrained in them, in particular the notions that blacks lack in intelligence, or are notoriously lazy and bent on criminality.

A few things need to be addressed from this quote: First, why is there a disproportionate percentage of black school teachers (only 7% of school teachers are black)? Instead of the African American community playing the perpetual “he hate me” blame game, why not encourage more African Americans to be school teachers? Secondly, it's befuddling that Mazama uses the word(s) “hypocritical” and “double standards” to stereotype 85% of teachers (White). Furthermore, it's disgusting that she (as an educator) would slander her peers on the basis of their skin color. To even make the notion that an ulterior motive exists for White teachers, that somehow they have a “covert” vendetta against anyone who doesn't look like them, is unfathomable! It's as if she's implying that although teachers as a whole are intelligent, overworked and under-payed, White teachers sacrifice potential and prosperity in order to discreetly showcase their racist attitudes. Temple University should be admonished for employing one with such a bigoted and ignorant perception.

Mazama blames White teachers' “unchecked prejudices” for “the over-referral of black students to special education programs and to the criminal system. African-American students are more than twice as likely to be labeled cognitively “deficient” than white American students. Although they only make up 17 percent of the student population, they nonetheless represent 33 percent of those enrolled in programs for the mentally challenged.” Mazama, who believes the atom was an African concept, obviously overestimates the average black IQ (or thinks IQ has nothing to do with academic achievement). This poor horse has been beaten to a bag of bones. She apparently doesn't understand that the entire reason black teachers aren't teaching black students is because of “white racism.” So, now that White teachers are teaching black students and they are still lagging, the excuse is the same - “white racism.” There comes a time, Mrs Mazama, when one just has to call a spade a spade (as impossible as that is for some).

Mazama must have a quota on her word count because she really starts grasping for straws when she claims that blacks are the victims of “harsh school punishments” at a disproportionate percentage (34% of all suspensions). According to her, “harsh school punishments have become one of the primary mechanisms through which the school-to-prison pipeline operates, pushing large numbers of black children out of school and into the “justice” system to feed the prison industrial complex that has blossomed over recent years.”

So, I'm assuming there is a systemic conspiracy between the public school system and the criminal justice system to incarcerate blacks. She calls this the “school-to-prison pipeline.” Assumptive on my behalf, but here is my translation: Racist White teacher expels black student for school infraction that he didn't commit. Black student then goes out into the street and is picked up by racist White cop and charged with a crime that he didn't commit. Black student now becomes Black criminal, but Black student/criminal really “dindu nuffin,” it was all a conspiracy on behalf of White institutional racism. Is that an accurate analogy of the“school-to-prison pipeline,” Mazama?

Mrs Mazama provides insight into the thought process of the modern day SJW – as Vox Day said, “SJWs ALWAYS LIE.” The difference between her racism and the racism she alleges? Her racism is blatant, overt and real, not covert and abstract. Again, think master-slave morality (consequences vs intentions).

She concludes with the following:“Many black homeschooling parents engage in racial protectionism, so that they will have the self-confidence and knowledge necessary to face and overcome the hurdles that white racism appears to place in their path.”

As racism takes on different meanings, so do phrases like “racial protectionism.” Mazama uses this phrase to represent a concept that establishes victimization (figuratively). I can't help but wonder how “many” White families decided to homeschool their children for reasons of “racial protectionism,” but with a literal meaning.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

5 of 6 cops resign after MO town elects Black mayor

Five of the six cops in a tiny Missouri city quit after voters elected their first black female mayor. 
Outgoing Mayor Randall Ramsey told the station the cops gave no notice and were joined by the city attorney, clerk and water treatment supervisor.
They cited “safety concerns” in their resignation letters, according to Ramsey.

So you're about to become a minority

The Most Hateful Group in America


"Truth cannot be found until we divest our minds of those prejudices and preconceptions that stand in its way."

Is such a thing possible?

White Suppression: The Big Lie

79 year old Man caught having Sex with Dog

A South Carolina man is accused of having sex with a dog. 
WACH reported that 79-year-old Freddie James has admitted to doing “the same thing to a little girl years ago and nobody did anything to him.” 
An acquaintance of the suspect reportedly said she was told by a neighbor that someone was in her yard having sex with her dog.

 Freddie James

Sunday, April 12, 2015

"Gimme Dat" Culture

After Phillip Buchanon was taken by the Raiders with the 17th overall pick in the 2002 NFL Draft, one of the first people he heard from was his mom, which makes sense because she's his mom. 
What didn't make sense to Buchanon though was what his mom wanted. The woman who raised him said he owed her $1 million for the child rearing.

Friday, April 10, 2015

Sun Tzu and the SJWs

Remember, SJWs ALWAYS LIE. Deceit is not second nature to them, it is their first and most reliable instinct. They will lie when they do not have to. They will lie when there is no reason to. They will lie when their lies are easily detected. They will lie when their lies are bound to be exposed. They will lie and and dissemble and exaggerate and spin with such shameless abandon that the average individual will find it almost impossible to believe they are doing so.

This ignorant self-delusion is significantly to our advantage. The problem conservatives have is that while they know themselves, they fix their eyes only on their own side and remain ignorant of the enemy. Thus the conservative "conquers, and the next time is defeated". The conservative knows himself and mistakenly assumes that his enemy is just like him.

Because they know neither themselves nor us, the SJWs will be "invariably defeated" so long as we identify them and see them for what they are: liars and self-deceivers. We have the ability to win every conflict with them, and yet we will inevitably lose everywhere we refuse to see them for what they are or refuse to take the field.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Police Shooting Video: Coincidence or Conspiracy?

First off, let me emphatically state for the record, that if this video is an accurate portrayal of the events that transpired, the officer who shot the man is definitely a murderer and deserves to be punished accordingly. Let me also convey the fact that I'm not one who thinks everything I view or read that doesn't support my narrative has to be a "conspiracy theory." As a matter of fact, I tend to side with whatever narrative is presented, and if I disagree, I do so out of logic based on presented evidence (e.g. Mike Brown didn't have his hands up when shot - per testimony).

Now let's look at this video which shows a White police officer shooting an allegedly unarmed, 50 year old Black man in the back seven or eight times while he trots away at grandpa speed. My first reaction was that I was viewing a B-rated film - something just didn't look right (if you're able to overlook the obvious injustice and observe human behavior). We have a camera man who happens upon the scene and coincidentally raises his camera at the exact moment the shooting occurs. The video shows a man running (I use the word "running" very loosely, as it was more of a trot) away from a police officer. The officer doesn't even attempt to give chase, he just nonchalantly draws his weapon and opens fire on a suspect that he could have chased down running backwards. I've watched enough episodes of Cops and the News to know this isn't the typical reaction of police officers and/or criminals in flee/pursuit situations. When a criminal flees police, they do so with a sense of urgency and police officers give chase with the same sense of urgency, then tackle the guy (rough him up a little) and take him to jail (or he gets away and they call in the dogs). I get the point that Cops is a made-for-TV show, and the officers understand they are being recorded. But, I would assume police officers are aware of their surroundings in intense situations (e.g. head on a swivel for their own personal safety), and I would think that this officer was conscious of the camera man (he definitely was after the shooting, as he looks at the camera). The police officer never shows any signs of panic, and I can't help but think if he was just a cold-blooded murderer, why he wouldn't have chased down the camera man and took the evidence (and shot him too, as I assume he was also a Black man - per his comments). One might say, "it's illegal to take someone's camera," but so is shooting unarmed people in the back 8 times (if a cop is willing to shoot an unarmed man in the back 8 times, then deceptively try to cover it up, why would he not be willing to illegally confiscate evidence that incriminates his actions?). Furthermore, the second cop didn't appear to act the way a police officer typically does when arriving on the scene of an office-involved shooting. It just seemed so... scripted (even down to the police officer dropping something - I've seen the same scene in the movies 100 times, and it's always choreographed to paint the cop out to be the bad guy).

Now, I want to reemphasize that I'm not saying this video is a hoax, I'm just saying there are some things in the video that just don't add-up, and quite frankly are unlike any police video I have witnessed (For example, I disagreed with the leftist's narrative of the Eric Garner video, but never for one second thought the video wasn't 100% legit).

To make an assertion that this video is some kind of setup, there would have to be a motive (all conspiracy theories have motives, right?). I'm not going to go into elaborate detail on that subject, as again, I'm not saying the video isn't legit, nor am I implying motive. But I will say this, White cops shooting unarmed Black men is a reoccurring theme of late, and civil unrest always comes as a result of these instances. Who benefits from civil unrest? Who benefits from White police officers being portrayed as racist murderers? I presume any number of motives can be applied to validate a "conspiracy theory" in this instance, just depends on which one the individual subscribes too. There have been several documented examples of "false flag" operations (A Brief History of False Flag Terror - 6 min video), so it's not like these kinda things are unprecedented. And when one considers the power of perception that is woven into the minds of the public after incidents such as this, a motive is rather obvious (think about how the 60's Birmingham Church bombing sealed the victory for the Civil Rights Movement. False flag? It has been alleged...). Just imagine the repercussion if this cop is acquitted.

When debating I usually like to throw this word out there: coincidence. For instance:

- Is it just a coincidence that the camera man raises the camera at the exact moment the officer opens fire?

- Is it just a coincidence that the man "runs" away at turtle speed, and whose body language doesn't represent urgency?

- Is it just a coincidence that the officer so calmly draws his weapon, shoots a man 8 times in the back while he is "jogging" away, re-holsters his firearm before securing the "dangerous" suspect, then causally walks up to the man lying face down on the ground and cuffs him, as if it's just another day at the office?

- Is it just a coincidence that the trained officer didn't take 30 seconds to run down the man and subdue him (there is NO WAY that man was going to outrun that cop), when it is likely he sensed the presence of on-lookers (and in the digital age, cameras that are recording)?

- Is it just coincidence that the police officer isn't aware of the immense scrutiny that cops (particularly White cops) are being faced with when dealing with non-White suspects? Did every cop in the nation get the memo to be on their "P's and Q's" when dealing with minority (particularly Black) suspects, except this guy?

- Is it just a coincidence that the camera man was "allowed" to record this incident without having his camera confiscated, or even worse? The video shows a cop that just murdered a man by shooting him in the back 8 times, why wouldn't he do the same to the camera man?

Who knows, maybe my perception is skewed because I just find it hard to believe that someone in a position of authority would act in such a careless, senseless, lawless way. Perhaps these coincidences are just merely circumstances that add to the injustice that has occurred. Maybe the video seems so surreal because the reality of such barbarism is so difficult to fathom - even when it's right in front of your face.

Somehow, right-wing conservatives (i.e. White Americans) and law enforcement have been socially lumped together, which I find ironic, considering many "conservatives" are out-of-touch with the establishment. However, it's not about sides, it's about logic, common sense and justice. Intuition is hard to ignore, so I've given mine a voice. What say you?

Sunday, April 5, 2015

ABC Refuses to Air Anti-Rahm Commercial

An ABC local television station is refusing to play a commercial that criticizes Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel, despite other stations airing it. 
Tucker Carlson reported on “Fox and Friends” this morning that Chicago’s ABC 7 took issue with the ad’s claim that Emanuel, who is seeking re-election, made $18 million in three years as an investment banker between 1999 and 2002. The ad also states that he used his position to turn his brother’s Uber investment into a billion dollars. 
Carlson noted that the city has a lot of problems including the huge crime rate. He also said that it has “some sad economic numbers” with 25 percent of African Americans in Chicago unemployed.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

GOP's Israel Support Increases with Financial Contribution Shift

As the proposed agreement over Iran’s nuclear programis debated in coming weeks, President Obama will make his case to a Congress controlled by Republicans who are more fervently pro-Israel than ever, partly a result of ideology, but also a product of a surge in donations and campaign spending on their behalf by a small group of wealthy donors.

But it is also true that Mr. Cotton and other Republicans benefited from millions in campaign spending in 2014 by several pro-Israel Republican billionaires and other influential American donors who helped them topple Democratic opponents. 

Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of J Street, a liberal pro-Israel group, said this relatively small group of very wealthy Jewish-Americans distorted the views among Jews nationwide who remain supportive of the Democratic Party and a more nuanced relationship with Israel.

“The very, very limited set of people who do their politics simply through the lens of Israel — that small group is tilting more heavily Republican now,” he said, adding, “But it is dangerous for American politics as too many people do not understand that of the six million American Jews, this is only a handful.”

The shift has also meant the Republican Party today accepts little dissent on the topic of Israel, said Scott McConnell, a founding editor of The American Conservative, an outcome he believes is in part driven by the demands of financial supporters. 

“Republicans interested in foreign policy used to understand that it was not in America’s national interest to ignore entirely Arab claims against Israel,” he said. “Now, there is a fanatical feeling of one-sidedness.” 

Several Republican senators and champions of Israel rejected any suggestion that the intensity of the party’s recent support had anything to do with money.

Friday, April 3, 2015

The Judge ~

"The law is the only thing capable of making people equal."

Mario Puzo ~

"A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a thousand men with guns."

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Matthew Heimbach St Patrick's Day Speech

Teen Who Received Controversial Heart Transplant Dead after Carjacking Chase

 A teen who received a controversial heart transplant two years ago is dead following a carjacking and high-speed chase near Atlanta. The teen made headlines in 2013 when he was rejected for a transplant over his juvenile record. Anthony Stokes, 17, gained national attention two years ago after Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta first rejected him as a heart transplant candidate after learning he had a juvenile record. 
What he did Tuesday afternoon cost Stokes his life. Roswell police say the teen led police on a high speed chase that ended in a violent crash on Alpharetta Highway. 
Police said Stokes’ crime spree started at perimeter mall with a carjacking. Then he drove to Alpine drive in North Fulton County and broke inside a house. A short time later, police spotted the stolen car and chased the teen up Alpharetta Highway near Hembree Road.