Deny Yourself

Matthew 16:24 Then Jesus said to his disciples, 'If anyone would come after me, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.'

A wise man once said that everyday is a new life to a wise man.

Everyday we surrender to the sins of the flesh. And everyday we seek forgiveness, grace and mercy from our Lord and Savior, the Risen Christ.

God took on the sins of the flesh and defeated death. He died on the cross for His bride, Israel.

Nobody deserves mercy. God is sovereign, and His sheep are ultimately slaves to His grace.

All glory be to God.

We are commanded to deny ourselves and take up our cross. "We" being Israel. The Bible was written to, for, by and about the descendants of Jacob, also known as Israel.

How do Israelites deny themselves?

By loving God with all your heart, and loving your neighbor as yourself.

Matthew 22:37-39 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.

And by repenting.

Acts 3:19 Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord

 Lord Christ Jesus, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!

Our Genius Bequeaths Us

Most people believe they have some sort inner genius in their genes. When you think about it, it really only makes sense. Unless your lineage is entirely made up of evolutionary mediocrity, which is essentially the antithesis of evolution, it would be rational to reason that somewhere in the family tree lies the gene of genius.

With modern innovation, there isn't any need for geniuses anymore. Science and technology have become our two principal geniuses.

We can look at Christopher Langan, who with the world's highest IQ is a modest horse farmer with his "theory of everything" (cognitive-theoretical model of the universe; CTMU) residing as his magnus opus. It's basically useless, and nobody cares about it. Maybe that's because nobody is smart enough to understand it, or maybe its just boring tripe.

Name a modern genius that is relevant? Aside from Langan, who you probably wouldn't have even thought of, give me a couple names. And before you throw it out there, I'm not sure that Musk is actually a genius. He is primarily just a Douglas Adams' protege who thinks we just need to ask the right questions.

The genius is obsolete. Science and technology will always override the genius. What do we even need geniuses for?

If evolutionary theory is accurate, the genius gene will not have any advantage in natural selection.

Considering most of evolutionary theory is pseudoscientific trash, maybe it doesn't matter. But we live in a world where the most genius movie ever made was a satirical comedy titled Idiocracy.

Meanwhile, we stream these "brilliant" movies like, One Battle After Another and are told this is the work of genius. Really? 

What happened to the genius writers? Where did all the genius artists and musicians disappear too?

The genius is always misunderstood. I'm not telling you that the genius has gone extinct, I'm telling you that the genius has gone silent, thus paving the path for extinction.

We judge the tree by the fruit that it bares. The human tree is barren, picked clean by the machine its geniuses created.

Now we wait. 

Yo, Women! This One's for You.

Women don't read this blog. There are many reasons for this, but some obvious ones are that women don't read blogs, and this blog is emotionally apathetic in a toxically masculine kind of way. 

A woman's worldview is centered around her feelings. Feelings are generally irrational. Therefore, we can make a generalized assumption that women have a strong tendency to be irrational. 

From a Christian perspective (this entire blog is written from a Christian perspective), a woman's feelings introduced sin into the world, and thus corrupted mankind in the process. As a result, we all suffer from a woman's irrational decision and blatant disobedience. The echoes of "misogynist!" doesn't change that. 

That doesn't mean all women are bad. Or that even some women are bad. That just means that we are slaves to sin because a woman used her feelings as a moral compass.

I don't hate women. Only a woman would insinuate that. It's like using the "R word" when someone shares a 13/50 meme. Totally feminine. Feminists assume that name-calling will hurt a person's feelings, so they name-call. Feminism is a feelings-based worldview.

I enjoy looking at women. I appreciate the physical beauty of a woman. But, I can relate to Pygmalion. A woman's nature exponentially devalues the essence of femininity. Women don't want to be objectified, yet the subject their feelings onto others in a matter of fact way that forces their value to be externalized.

It's rather interesting that Christianity wouldn't be needed as a religion if Eve hadn't fornicated with the serpent. So when we cite the scriptures, they are precise on the woman question:

1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.

And:

1 Corinthians 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

Mind you, my female comrades, I am not here to be mean to you. I am trying to steer you towards the truth. Men who are familiar with the desires of women will be seduced by their perceived vulnerability the way Adam was by Eve.

2 Timothy 3:6-7 They are the kind who work their way into people’s homes and win the confidence of vulnerable women who are burdened with the guilt of sin and controlled by various desires.7 (Such women are forever following new teachings, but they are never able to understand the truth.)

Modern women, infatuated with feminism, have replaced God with egalitarianism. In the midst of their secular conversion, they continue to lead unsuspecting men to unrighteousness and sin, as their godmother Eve did in the beginning. 

Genesis 3:1-24 Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ” Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings. And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. Then the LORD God called to Adam and said to him, “Where are you?” So he said, “I heard Your voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; and I hid myself.” And He said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you that you should not eat?” Then the man said, “The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.” And the LORD God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” So the LORD God said to the serpent: “Because you have done this, You are cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life. And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.” To the woman He said: “I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you.” Then to Adam He said, “Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat of it’: “Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it All the days of your life. Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, And you shall eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread Till you return to the ground, For out of it you were taken; For dust you are, And to dust you shall return.” And Adam called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. Also for Adam and his wife the LORD God made tunics of skin, and clothed them. Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— therefore the LORD God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. So He drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life.

Feminism was a failure from the beginning. How are we as a society still entertaining such ignorance?  

Yea, About Expectations....

Failed expectations are the root of demoralization. This is true for the group and the individual.

Social engineers are well aware of this. That's why the masses are constantly demoralized.

In the status quo, the PTB are pretty much forced to keep the herd in a state of perpetual demoralization, otherwise the state would constantly be dealing with revolutionaries.

Sure, ICE whistlers technically have the revolutionary spirit, but they're more of the obnoxious Alinsky-style tactical breed than that of a Hofferite true believer. Plus, it's just hard to get onboard with criminals who have devalued what it is to be an American. Without law and order, the United States is just an undefinable land mass of abstractions.

However, according to the Pygmalion Effect, high expectations also lead to improved performance.

Pygmalion was an interesting man. Similar to Narcissus, who fell in love with his own reflection, Pygmalion fell in love with his own sculpture. Oddly, the sculpture was that of a woman, which focused on the external beauty of women, and not the faults that dominate the flawed intrinsic nature of a female.

This is likely the genesis of the blowup doll bride in modernity.

The Bible preaches about "youthful lust":

2 Timothy 2:22 Run from anything that stimulates youthful lust.

Love for ourselves, our creations or women are all the "youthful lust" Paul was writing to Timothy about.

Why does a man's heart forsake his soul? 

Why are a man's desires always sickened with sin?

These type of questions are never answered in words. Well, they are, but the answers don't generate the knowledge that experience does. One has to experience the desire of "youthful lust" to comprehend it. One has to experience the slavery of sin in order to understand its mastery.

Ode to AA

Failed at my abstinence April attempt. It is what it is. Life is a series of wins and losses. As with the pendulum of power, the winning percentage is always swaying. 

Considering the first paragraph, you probably assume that AA stands for alcoholics anonymous. However, you'd be wrong in that assumption.

AA is the most prolific pro-white blogger in history. He recently shut down his blog. I know at one time his site had a few million unique monthly hits, while essentially being banned from all financial institutions and the internet. That in and of itself speaks volumes.

I read the Stormer daily for years. He had a profound impact on my worldview. He was a brilliant writer. It's unfortunate that we live in a time where those with dissenting views can be de-platformed the way he was. But it also shows how influential his writing was.

I didn't agree with everything he said, but I loved how he merged humor with politics. 

Anyone who sacrifices everything they have for a message they believe in deserves to be remembered in the analogs of history.

Dunbar's Number

The British anthropologist Dunbar presented a theory that associated brain size with average social group size. He developed this theory studying primates, and then transferred his findings to humans. His conclusion is that the sweet spot for human relationships is 150.

This is all pseudoscience, of course. Assuming that there is an evolutionary link, and humans are just upright apes who crawled out the jungles and became homo erectus. Maybe that happened. I doubt it. But whatever.

The Science says it, so it has to be true, right?

Long time readers of My Cousin the Carp, are well aware that the very essence of this blog is not "racism," but rather to poke the bear that is evolution.

And before you start thinking, "Wait a minute, isn't racism a byproduct of evolutionary science?" keep in mind that I never claimed to be a "racist."

I would classify myself as more of an Idiocracist: 

But this isn't about me, this is about you. Nobody cares how I label myself. We don't construct our own image. Your opinion of me likely doesn't match my opinion of myself.

I read this book one time. It was titled the Power of Now. The idea behind the book was that you are not your ego. At least that's what I took from it.

Isn't it weird how you can read hundreds of books and barely recall some of them? Or maybe just recall an idea that the book was attempting to convey?

Honestly, who cares about Dunbar's number? What is the significance of it? How is it relative? I suppose anarchists love that theory. Because it's the theoretical (or is it hypothetical?) number of people within a tribe that eliminates the need for government. 

But there are tons of theories that would answer pretty much every existential question. Do we ever enact them? 

What is the point of evolutionary science anyway?

I'm more interested in emotional self control when I lose at a competitive event.

Evolutionary science says we are hard wired to hate losing.

So if you're not a sore loser, you're just a loser.

Actually, I completely understand our emotions in correlations to self control. What I don't understand is luck.

Explain it to me like I'm 5, because I sure can't explain it to you like you're 50.

God bless.

P.S. Yes, I lost at poker today.

P.S.S. Yes, I'm still sober.

P.S.S.S. Bitcoin is crashing. If you bought BTC back in 2015 when it was $250 like I told you too, you're rich. Don't be stingy about donating a little to me for making you wealthy. 

April Abstinence

Abstinence is the practice of voluntarily not doing something that is wanted or enjoyed.

Why would anyone voluntarily not do something they enjoy doing?

There are lots of quick-witted axioms that come to mind. I think most people understand why people practice abstinence of one form or the other.

For me it comes down to self-control, general health and well being, overall self improvement and morality.

When I pray, I ask God to heal me "mind, body and spirit." When a person takes "eat, drink and be merry" too far, the "mind, body and spirit" become sick. Those things need time to heal. I need time for reflection. This is why God has encouraged me to abstain from the pleasures of this world for the month of April.

In other news, this AI thing is just ridiculous. I can't quite figure out what all the fuss is about. AI is autistic. I mean, have you ever tried to have a conversation with it? 

Just look at the above picture. I asked AI to "create an image of a writer struggling with alcoholism" and that's what it "created."

Why in the world does it have a picture of this man's family facing away from him? Why is he using a typewriter? Why are there cigarette butts on the desk? Why is the book upside down?

I've written about this AI thing many times on this blog over the course of the last 12 years. 

People who worry about AI overtaking humanity haven't really worked through the details in their head. Where is the motivation of the machine? The machine is just a manifestation of it's programmer. It's like a calculator and an encyclopedia were impregnated by an anti-white liberal and produced a child of Satan.

I asked AI to create an image of a hillbilly with a confederate flag on his hat and AI said it was incapable of doing that.

If you're a writer, musician or mathematician, you might have some worries. 

But modern music is just crap. Mostly because it's influenced and/or created by AI. 

Writers are too lazy to write, so they use AI. So it's crap, too (btw, this is one of the only 100% HI blogs still in existence). 

And everything above algebra is crap that was invented by AI to make humans believe that they are intellectually inferior to the machines they created.

So, in conclusion, AI is the autistic love child of an anti-white cyborg.

Quit overthinking the "I have to learn AI because everyone is talking about AI so it must be cool" and just focus on God.

It's good Friday.

And abstinence April.

He is risen!

What Happened to the UFC?

As I said in yesterday's post, my TV consumption consists of the Reality TV trinity: First 48, Jeopardy, and UFC.

Recently the UFC signed a new deal with Paramount +. It got rid of the PPV model, which is a good thing for people who actually spent $100 to watch 5 fights. Although I would speculate that roughly 1 in 10 people who watched the UFC PPV's actually paid for them. According to friends, it was never hard to find a stream online.

However, ever since this new deal (and even before; there was like 6 weeks without any fights) the quality of fights have just been crapola. 

It's easy to play armchair quarterback. Everyone thinks they know more than they do. But some of these fights are atrocious and completely uninteresting.

Just look at the UFC London card from yesterday. Who would pay to watch that card? That MVP fight was horrible. The UFC should cut that guy.

I hated watching MVP even when he was in Bellator. He is such a boring fighter to watch. A lot of people would say "it's his style," but Wonderboy Thompson has the same karate style and his fights are never boring. MVP just sucks to watch.

Who knows, maybe I'm just racist. But did you watch that fight?

I mentioned the new deal with Paramount because I think it was for like $8 billion over a few years. And I wonder if the UFC struck gold with that deal and they just don't really care anymore. They're getting paid, so complacency has set in.

Or maybe the deal was bad and they can't afford to pay the fighters enough to make good fights.

In any event, they really need to step up their game, because these fight cards have been whack.

Everyone had such huge expectations for the White House card, and did you see what it ended up being? 

The main event will be good, but Nickal vs Daukaus? Really?

Maybe I'm just being cynical, but if you have the opportunity to put on a monumental show at the White House, the card should be better than this. 

Be honest, aside from the Gaethje vs Topuria fight (which is going to result in Gaethje going night-night), are you excited about any of those fights? Even the press conference is going to suck.

I mean, sure, I'm going to watch, but will I be counting down the days in excitement? Not a chance.

Maybe there will be some bangers on the prelims.

Cheers! 

The Banshees of Diversity

Do you know what a banshee is? I honestly thought it was some type of monkey. But it's actually a crazy Irish woman. Like an Irish witch.

I wonder how many things we think we know but actually don't.

Dumb people think they know everything. Smart people know they know nothing.

I don't watch many movies. I don't watch much TV at all. But, when I do it's the reality TV trinity: Jeopardy, UFC or First 48. 

However, last night I decided to not pickle my liver, and opted for a movie instead. The problem with me watching movies is that I have really bad ADHD, so it's hard to stare at a TV screen for 2 hours unless it's something I'm really interested in. In fact, there are a couple of movies that I've always wanted to watch, but won't even attempt them because they are 3 hours long.

Is that weird?

So I scoured the plethora of scribbles on the various pieces of paper which clutter my desk in search of some movie recommendations that I wrote down, and I was only able to find two: Nocturnal Animals and The Banshees of Inisherin. 

I had already watched Nocturnal Animals, and as much as I appreciated the artistic imagery in the first 5 minutes of the movie, there are only a handful of movies that I can watch more than once due to my severe ADHD, and Nocturnal Animals isn't one of them.

So that left me watching The Banshees of Inisherin.

As you can tell from my movie selections, I only watch weird movies. This is a sign of normalcy. Weird people watch normal movies, and normal people watch weird movies. It's that opposites attract thing that Paula Abdul sang about in the 80's.

The movie was odd. That along with the lack of diversity made it worthy of watching.

There were literally no non-whites in the movie. Seriously, when was the last time you watched anything on TV that didn't force diversity on the viewers.

Diversity in the form of entertainment is okay, I guess, as long it's realistic and organic. But the entertainment industry has always been obsessively anti-white.

Nonetheless, the plot of the movie is based on a couple of drinking buddies who have a falling out. One doesn't like the other anymore, and the unliked one won't accept it. The one who wants to be left alone, tells the other one that if he doesn't leave him alone, he is going to start cutting his own fingers off, which are valuable to him because his legacy depends on his violin playing. Without his fingers, he can't play music.

Spoiler alert: The unliked one won't leave him alone, so he cuts all of his fingers off and throws them at the man's door who won't quit talking to him. The unliked man's pet miniature donkey eats the fingers, chokes and dies. This makes the unliked man furious, so he burns the fingerless man's house down. 

The End. 

You're Only as Good as You Feel

What is this crap? That sounds like something a liberal would say.

But this blog isn't about cons and libs, it's about the Truth!

On my run today, I had this great idea for a blog post. It's weird how when you're running you always have the best ideas. The same thing happens when I'm drunk, too. I literally transform into a genius.

All great writers, human and otherwise, write backwards. What I mean by that is that we conceive a title, then create the plot and text body based on the title. The plot is just the summation of the title, and/or vice versa. The genesis of literary greatness is a thorough explanation of a simple idea. 

Writing is like a puzzle, you just slowly put the pieces together.

You have this jumbled up idea in your head, and you translate that idea into written words that act as puzzle pieces in order to interpret your thoughts.

Intelligent men have always been great at interpreting their thoughts using written words. The annals of human thought were written by men. In fact, history itself is nothing more than the biographies of great men. 

This is why the future extinction of human writers is an interesting phenomenon. I wrote about this yesterday, in case you were hungover and didn't feel like reading. 

Back to this "you're only as good as you feel" thing. 

Is there some validity to your feelings? Do your feelings determine anything tangible? What if you feel great, but perform like shit? What if you feel like shit, and perform great?

In the future (as you well know), feelings will be marketed and sold. Currently, there are pharmaceuticals that synthetically alter your feelings. But at some point you'll be able to get some kind of procedure or supplement that will induce certain feelings.

We will all have personal assistants (AI) who are somehow digitally synced with humans (nanochips; voluntary?), and they will give readings on our personal app that will keep our feelings optimized at all times.

As with writers, depression will be a thing of the past. Everyone will be perpetually happy.

You won't even need to go down the "feelings" aisle at the health food store, you'll be a machine that will be updated by your personal assistant hourly or daily. 

Weird, huh?

Eventually, those with the genetic inheritability of European explorers will all be doing space exploration. 

Will it be the final frontier? 

I've written about this, too. Earth will just be a nature exhibit for the elites who live on Mars. People won't vacation to other countries, they will visit other planets. 

Times, they are a changin'

HI vs AI

I just told Gemini to "write a short blog post titled Chink in the Armor." It was pretty impressive considering it only took 1 second for Gemini to produce it, and I didn't instruct it on the content, just the title. I encourage you to read it and see what you think.

Writers have become obsolete. Why do we need human writers? What can I say that AI can't?

I wonder how much of the stuff you read is AI? Do you even care?

There is going to come a day when humans no longer write. By the time that happens, nobody will care because the transition will be gradual. It'll be a generational thing, where writing just slowly gets phased out.

As you age, it's weird to watch generational change. I've written a lot about socially engineered change and that's not the change I'm talking about here. I'm talking about cultural change that evolves organically due to circumstances.

Pennies are another example. In 50 years only the "old-timers" will even know what a penny is. I suspect by that time all currency will be digital anyway, so people may not even know what a nickel or dime is either.

It's cliche to say that "time flies," but it really does. One day you wake up and look in the mirror and don't recognize the person looking back at you. That doesn't have anything to do with artificial intelligence eliminating the writer, it's just the realization that we all come to one day if God gives us enough time on earth.

The oddity about the elimination of writers is that so much of humanity is rooted in the writings of men. Practically all of our knowledge comes from the pens of great men. Even our existence is explained in the written words ordained by God.

The subtitle to this very blog is John 1:1:

In the beginning was the Word

For 2,000 years man has used the written word to solve his existential crisis, and soon men will no longer write (very few still do).

I don't want to try to manipulate you, but I'm one of the few writers left who don't use AI in some format. And before you say "what about that chink in the armor post?," that was to give me fodder for this post. There are only two posts on this entire blog that were written by AI: Chink in the Armor and Beyond Good and Evil: Unpacking Nietzsche's Radical Challenge. Every other word on this blog was written by yours truly. 

I guess what I'm trying to say is that pennies are about to be gone. One day you're going to look in the mirror and say, "Damn, I'm getting old!" And humanity has birthed its last great writer.

A great writer once said: "Life sucks, then you die." 

A great writer who read those words later wrote: "Life is amazing, then you die."

Buckle up, buckaroo.

Chink in the Armor

Chink in the Armor: The Power of Strategic Vulnerability

We often spend our professional and personal lives trying to become "bulletproof." We build up layers of expertise, curated social media feeds, and stoic exteriors to convince the world—and ourselves—that we have it all figured out. We want a suit of armor so polished that not a single ray of doubt can get through.

But here’s the truth: The most "perfect" person in the room is usually the most disconnected.

The Perfection Paradox

In materials science, a structure with no flexibility is brittle; it doesn’t bend, it snaps. The same applies to us. A "chink in the armor"—a visible flaw, a moment of admitted uncertainty, or a shared failure—isn't a sign of impending defeat. It’s actually where the light gets in.

Why Vulnerability is Your Greatest Asset

• It Builds Trust: People can’t relate to a statue. When you admit you don't have the answer, you give others permission to be honest too.

• It Facilitates Growth: If your armor is sealed shut, you can't take anything new in. Acknowledging a gap in your knowledge is the first step toward filling it.

• It Humanizes Leadership: The best leaders aren't those who never fail, but those who are transparent about the "why" and "how" behind their setbacks.

---

Embracing the Gap

Finding a "chink" in your own armor shouldn't lead to panic. Instead, view it as a strategic opening. It’s an invitation for collaboration, a prompt for learning, and a reminder that being human is far more valuable than being a machine.

Don't spend all your energy patching every tiny hole. Sometimes, those gaps are exactly what allow you to breathe.

Hell is a Cold Place

I don't know if hell is a cold place or not. I hope I never know.

I have heard that the road to hell is paved in good intentions. I don't know if that's true or not either.

I recently read a book about the exploration of the Antarctic, and one of the explorers (Frederick Cook) penned an unpublished autobiography titled, "Hell is a Cold Place." 

Cook was an interesting fellow. He was originally credited with being the first person to reach the North Pole, only to later be discredited and labeled a fraud. Many of his peers considered him a genius. 

Ironically, Robert Peary claimed to reach the North Pole a year later (1909), and had long been credited as the discoverer of the North Pole after Cook's claim was invalidated, although now it is believed Peary didn't make it to the North Pole either.

These early explorers were pioneers of masculinity. 

European men are the pinnacle of God's creation.

Perhaps you disagree with that statement. I don't really see how you could, but I assume if you do disagree then it's likely rooted in some form of ideological conformity. Because the acknowledgement of white supremacy has somehow been made taboo.

That being said, if you're looking for a really interesting read, check out Madhouse at the End of the Earth. It's a really good book. And very well written. I highly recommend the audiobook. 

Btw, I won my poker game today. Does that mean I'm no longer a loser?

European men have this perpetual longing to win. To explore. To conquer. It's in our DNA. Don't take my word for it, the proof is in the pudding.

Oh, Happy St Patrick's Day! Especially if you're Irish, like I am.

To celebrate this day, I'm making corned beef and cabbage. I hope you're at least drinking beer. Or giving glory to God.

St Patrick was an amazing European man. Do you know his story?

St. Patrick was a 5th-century Romano-British Christian missionary and bishop in Ireland, known as the "Apostle of Ireland" and the primary patron saint of the country.  Born in Roman Britain—likely near the Irish Sea—he was captured at age 16 by Irish raiders and enslaved in Ireland for six years, during which he turned to Christianity. After escaping and returning to Britain, he later felt called to return to Ireland as a missionary, bringing Christianity to the pagan Irish.

Wow. I'm all over the place. 

Can you believe I won at poker?

Speaking of Saints, St Paul has some words for you:

Colossians 2:8 Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.

If you're still reading this, may the luck of the Irish be with you.

Maybe that's why I won today.

All glory to God, who is the Truth. The Life. And the Way. 

Stranger in the Mirror

Just lost at poker again.

Have I ever told you that I'm a loser?

Not in the "woe is me" sense of the word, but an actual competitive loser. Every time I compete, I lose. 

As I blogged the other day in my hit piece Hello Me, It's Me Again, competing is all about winning and losing. Whoever came up with the saying, "it's not whether you win or lose, but how you play the game" was a total loser. And definitely a liberal.

Have you ever linguistically dissected the word "liberal"?

I haven't either, but I assume it comes from the word "liberated," which would obviously have something to do with freedom.

Oh well.

Did I tell you that I hate losing?

Btw, I'm not actually talking to you, I'm talking to the future of mankind. 

I bet the future is overpopulated with losers. Which is kinda weird when you think about it, because evolutionarily speaking, making it to the future is the ultimate win.

Is life a game? Sometimes I feel like life is just a game. Then I realized that's just my feelings and my feelings don't matter anymore than yours do.

Here at My Cousin the Carp, we've been boss hog bloggin' since 2014. I suppose that's a win. How many people have had a boss hog blog for over a decade?

You could literally formulate an educational plan from the annals of this blog. It's that informative.

In fact, during the Covid era, this blog was one of the leading sources of information. Just go scroll through some of the posts in 2021 and 2022. I mean, it was the crème de la crème of information during a time of universal deception.

Don't you hate it when there are coffee grounds in your coffee? It's the worst. It's basically just consumptive losing.

Damn I hate being a loser.

But at least I'm not a gangster. Or a gangsta. Biologically speaking, I don't think I could be a "gangsta," since I'm of the Caucasian persuasion. I could only be a gangster. But I did know a brotha once who told me it feels good to be a gangsta. 

What!? Another Geto Boys sighting on My Cousin the Carp? I thought this was a racist blog?

I never said this was a racist blog. You said that.

What I'm really trying to say is that we all need to look at ourselves in the mirror and pretend it's the abyss. Everyone thinks these philosophers are so damn smart because they come up with catchy phrases like, "if you stare into the abyss long enough, it'll start to stare back."

What Nietzsche was really trying to say is that your soul is the abyss, and the only real question is what you fill that void with. Is it filled with the Holy Spirit, or has it been liberated by Satan?

Think about that before you misinterpret it. It's pretty deep stuff. Make sure you're wearing your boots. Because as a great philosopher once said, "if you're going to jump in muddy puddles, you must wear your boots."

I sure hope you don't have coffee grounds in your coffee today. 

I'm sick of taking L's.

Rejoice!

It's Sunday. Everyday is the Lord's day, but today in particular should be the day that we take time to glorify God for all the blessings he has bestowed upon us.

I say "we," but I suppose I'm projecting and should be saying "I."

God's grace is sovereign. My opinions on your soul don't matter to God. At least I don't think they do. So my spiritual writings should always be written from a first person perspective.

The gospels are known as the "Good News." It was written to be shared. But was it written for everyone?

Are there any books that are exclusive to specific readers? 

Who knows?

God knows!

As a wretched sinner I can only give my testimony.

I didn't choose God, God chose me.

That's not boasting. Just the simple fact that I'm writing this is proof of that.

John 15:16 You didn’t choose me. I chose you.

I could be doing anything right now. I could be writing about anything. But I felt inclined to write about God today. Is that a coincidence? Or is that the Holy Spirit?

God represents the Truth, because He is the Truth:

John 14:6 I am the way and the truth and the life.

We live in a world of a deception. A world full of lies. The arch nemesis of God is the father of lies.

John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

We all succumb to temptation. We all believe lies. We are all sinners.

But God came to earth in the form of a man to be the perfect sacrifice for His bride.

To be crucified for His people's sins.

The Bible is the greatest love story ever told.

I pray every day for God's grace, mercy and forgiveness.

Philippians 4:6 Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God.

 All Glory be to God!

Winds of Change

The best time to think is while running. I try to run a mile at least 5 days a week. It's not only great cardio, but it's mentally stimulating. 

While on my run yesterday I was contemplating this idea that we somehow change with age. There is this notion that age equals change. But I don't agree with that. I still socially interact with people I knew before adulthood and they are the same people. 

While this may seem stupid to you, I think most people think they are somehow completely different people than who they were as a kid. 

Wiser? Sure.

Smarter? Absolutely.

More mature? Maybe.

But fundamentally different? Nah, not at all.

Do you disagree? 

Think back to your earliest thoughts of recollection. To the ideas that shaped you. Are they different?

Do the same things still create emotional responses?

Are you still a sore loser? Still have a passive personality? Still fantasize about hot summer nights and the radio?

Is that not the greatest Van Hagar Song of all-time?

You know it is. 

But back to change. 

Change has become this progressive idea. Progressive ideas are constructed to be positive. All progressive ideas encompass "change."

I've written about the ramifications of socially engineered "change" quite a bit. 

I've been an advocate of what I call the Reversion of Change, which I suppose is just the antithesis of progressive modernity (i.e. "conservativism"). 

But the progressives who preach "change" aren't just preaching political "change," they want fundamental existential "change."

They get off on manipulation and gaslighting. 

The Covid fiasco was a peak into their wet dream.

It's all about power. 

It's all about trying to get you to stare into the abyss and being convinced that it's paradise.

Imagine if we didn't have mass information systems.

You wouldn't know what tomorrow's weather is going to be.

You wouldn't know that men's souls could be trapped in women's bodies.

You wouldn't know that Beethoven was black.

You wouldn't know that anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-white.

And you wouldn't be reading my words well into the 23rd century.

Mass information systems don't just control your behaviors and actions, but they control your thoughts and beliefs. 

Like liberalism, it's the god of the godless.

Very early on in my intellectual enlightenment I came to understand the association of "change" and mass information systems. They are codependent. 

I wrote a critically acclaimed novel titled White Guilt on this very subject. 

It was published in 2009, and the accuracy of my "fictional" predictions is pretty amazing.

You should check it out.

Snowblind in Summer

You know what's cool about having your own creative digital space? You can come up with titles like "Snowblind in Summer." 

How cool is that?

I bet your mom wishes she was that cool.

Theoretically, that's what "Snowblind in Summer" means: an oblivious blog title that's cooler than your mom.

You know what else is pretty cool? This blog is being HI written for the historical accuracy of humanity, even though the future of humanity doesn't read blogs.

AI sure is bad at predicting the future. That's why relics like me are so important. I'm like a history book in 7D. In the future, all humans gotta wear shades. C'mon, Gemini. 

Anyway, back to the title. 

I remember this time I was stuck in a snowstorm in the middle of summer. It was an historic weather event of the time. The weather was doing all kinds of crazy stuff and people got this weird idea of human-induced "global warming," that later became known as "climate change," which then became politicized into some kind of weird anti-white talking-point for overweight single white females (SOWs) who knew absolutely nothing about meteorology. 

Of course, this summer snowstorm validated the weather as being anti-white, and the SOWs became convinced that the only way to fix the weather was to quit eating meat and for white people to stop breeding, while non-whites bred at unsustainable rates, due to the implications of white saviorism within the non-white world.

It was bizarre, indeed.

So, I'm stuck in a tent on a dried-up riverbank in a snowstorm in the Rio Grande Valley. It went from 105 to 15 overnight. There was 12' of snow. I couldn't even open my tent up. All I had was a pair of shorts. It was like that apocalyptic movie from the early 2000 with the guy that played in Brokeback Mountain:

After getting hypothermia in a matter of minutes, suddenly the temperature rose back to 90 and everything was back to normal. My hands and feet thawed out before any permanent damage was done, and I just cracked a beer and put on some Black Sabbath. I got the worst sunburn ever.

I thought about titling this piece "Snowblind in Texas," but I changed my mind cause I thought, "Everyone will think I'm copying WASP's song," then I realized that I was merging Black Sabbath's "Snowblind" with WASP's "Blind in Texas." 

But I already titled it, so that's that. All writers know that you start with the title then go from there. You can't change the title. It's like changing your underwear 30 minutes after you took a shower. Pure blasphemy.

I know this blog post sucks even better than you mom does, but at least you get to jam to some something better than the Geto Boys (although this year Halloween falls on a weekend):

Cheers!

Chapter 14: Insanity

Crazy is as crazy does.

I don't even know what that means. I'm just trying to be cool and say smart stuff. But once one realizes they are neither cool, nor smart, they are resigned to the acceptance of normalcy or insanity.

Which are you?

Maybe you disagree. Maybe you're just "humble."

Insanity is such a broad arbitrary diagnosis. 

What makes one insane? Is typing one's meaningless thoughts into an electronic contraption that records them for the future worthy of an inanity diagnosis?

What about pooping in the woods and then covering it up with leaves hoping a wild animal confuses it for buried treasure?

When I was younger I use to throw apple cores over the house into the woods that were behind my house. I would watch various animals eat the apple remains from my window. I wonder if these animals ever stopped to think where this food was coming from? 

Decades passed and I returned to the house and discovered a thriving "wild" apple orchard now existed where I use to chunk the apple cores.

It made me think about Plato's Cave. 

Anytime I think about allegories I always come back to the perception of truth.

I can't help but wonder how the owner of that wooded land thinks this thriving apple orchard came to be.

Or where the animals who ate the cores daily for years thought this delicious food source originated.

Before you say, "hey, wait just a minute, we are humans and we have the ability to reason, and squirrels, birds and bugs don't so your point is moot," keep in mind that many consider humans to just be naked apes. 

I remember one time a flea-infested cat showed up on my porch and I fed it. Did I do a good thing, or prolong it's misery?

If naked apes are animals with the ability to reason, why do you we ask questions that we already know the answers to? 

Aren't rhetorical questions a form of schizophrenia?

Furthermore, why do people ask questions that they know the answers to and expect you to lie to them so the "truth" doesn't hurt their feelings.

The only thing weirder than that is this blog post.

Hello Me, It's Me Again

Welp, here I am. Talking to myself and then transcribing it for the future to read.

Does the future still read? Hmm. I doubt it.

I know it's been awhile since I have wrote anything. My goal was (is?) to write more in 2026 on My Cousin the Carp than I have in any other previous year. 

I started out hot, but have since been frigid. 

That doesn't mean I've been exploring Antarctica, as Adrien de Gerlache did on the Belgica in the late 19th Century. It just means my writing has been colder than a witch's tit.

But that's alright. Nobody is perfect. Most goals aren't achieved. And the year isn't over yet. So don't give up on yourself.

Wait. Who am I talking to here? I'm playing poker and transcribing my thoughts simultaneously and have forgotten who my audience is. 

Oh, now I remember. I'm writing to myself so the future can know the mind of lunatic.

Isn't it kinda crazy how society devolved in the 20th century? I mean, in the realm of music, how does Geto Boys compare to Chopin or Wagner? 

I wonder how the Geto Boys would've faired on the Belgica?

Anyway, I just lost my poker game. I always lose at every game I play. This isn't a pity-party, it's so history knows that I was a loser.

But hey, it's not how you play the game, it's how you lose, right?

Was that the saying? I can't remember. I think it might be, "it's not if you win or lose, it's how you play the game."

Either way, whoever came up with that saying was definitely a loser.

All games are explicitly about winning and losing. Anyone who says anything different is either a liar or a loser. That "humble" crap is just narcissism. 

Speaking of narcissism, I've concluded that only a narcissist would label someone a narcissist. It's kinda like calling someone a "racist." They're both terms of projection.

I assume by the time the future reads this they will already know that. I mean, it's obvious. But unfortunately contemporary culture has become spellbound with inferiority by the satanic social engineers of the status quo.

Yes, that really happened.

Even though I don't know you, I hope you have an amazing day.

Full-Man Fights Half-Man

What in tarnation is this?

I mean, is the AI?

Why would a full-man fight a half-man?

What does the full-man have to gain from this?

Is this just about money or what?

Seriously. In what scenario does half-man win this "fight"? Like what does he do to win? Arm triangle?

I'm not even sure what to say here. I just wanted to make sure the future is given an accurate representation of history.

This "fight" will be reminiscent of slavery or the holocaust or something. The future just won't believe it actually happened. It'll be mythical. The only reason we know it's "real" is because full-man won. If half-man would've "won" then we could say it was AI or some kind of weird publicity stunt. 

But nope. Full-man just basically walked around to the back of half-man and put him in a choke hold.

This video should say: 

Warning: For entertainment purposes only!

Maybe that should be the new motto of this blog.

I think I'll just go back to day dreaming. I mean, day drinking.

Emotional Fragility

I was scrolling social media and saw that some reality show got "cancelled" because the host said an offensive word.

https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/hgtv-cancels-rehab-addict-star-nicole-curtis-uses-offensive-racial-com-rcna258747

HGTV has canceled the home renovation reality series "Rehab Addict" after host Nicole Curtis made what the cable channel described as an "offensive racial comment" during filming.

I don't personally watch reality shows, or TV in general, so I don't really care about the show. But I find it so crazy that these "arbitrators of virtue" get so offended by words, while TV in general is pure filth from a moral standpoint. The plot of every show is sex, scandal, violence and crime.

It's no secret that these people in the television industry are satanic scumbags. Yet, they virtuously cling to morality by being openly anti-white.

I don't know what the lady said, nor do I care. But I assume it was something negative about blacks. 

Why can people not have a negative opinion about blacks?

Cancelling a show because someone said something "negative" about blacks doesn't make "arbitrators" virtuous; it makes them childish.

If anything this whole, "you better not say anything bad about black people cause it will hurt my feelings cause it might hurt their feelings" is coddling blacks as if they're children who can't handle being called a bad name.

I saw this meme the other day where some liberal white woman was saying how real ID is racist because black people can't figure out how to apply for it. And below was some smiling black guy saying, "lol oh really?"

This is the essence of "racism." It's virtue signaling by single white women and Jews, because at their core they are bad people who want to feel good about themselves.

If they would just put their faith in the Word of Truth instead of the "N word" they would find the hope they are missing.

God Bless!

Why Do You Drink?

Welp, I did it. I drank a 12 pack to celebrate the ending of dry January and I feel like shit.

You remember that old country song that goes something like:

Tell me Hank, why do you drink?

That was a real banger back in the day, wasn't it?

I can remember being in those Texas honky-tonks getting drunk and listening to music like this.

Y'all probably don't know nothing about honky-tonks. 

It's just another word for a country bar. 

I've pissed-out a pretty penny in many a honky-tonk listening to some country music.

Country music is the best. It's music for the soul. It's mostly about getting drunk over some woman. Who can't relate?

Remember this one?

You don't know nothing about no David Allan Coe. 

He was drunk the day his momma got out of prison.

I should be drunk while I'm writing this. Then I'd have an excuse for the poor content. It's pretty pathetic to crank out this kind of crap and admit that you're sober.

If you're still reading at this point, you definitely don't have ADHD. Maybe OCD. Or an elevated BAC. But, like, OMG! Who is your PCP? Do they prescribe TRT? Do they accept BTC?

See what I did there?

Pure genius.

I'm just rambling now. That's the cool thing about the autonomy of blogging. You can just type whatever you want. It's like your fingers have a mind of their own. 

Pure improve, I say.

I wonder if I was a rapper in a past life.

BRB.

Oh yea, I knew there was something I was getting at.

Why do you drink?

Bloggin for the Noggin

It's the last day of January. 

I'm sitting here drinking coffee at 6 in the evening. But, since January is over, that means I can drink something much stronger than coffee.

Dry January was OK. Nothing eventful happened. I did a lot of chess puzzles. I always do a lot of chess puzzles. 

Have I told you that I'm really good at chess?

I mean, objectively good at chess, not just thinking I'm good at chess. 

I was determined to be "good" at chess, therefore I concluded via objective reasoning that 1800 Elo was the criteria for one to claim that they are "good" at chess.

Your boy is 1900.

Your boy is good at chess.

Check out the game below if you want to destroy the King's Indian Defense.

I'm looking forward to drinking beer again. But it's weird. Because as much as I like to drink beer, I don't like the fact that it's a vice.

Everyone has vices. 

What's your vice?

Mine is obsessive chess and cold beer.

I suppose those vices could be much worse. Imagine if smoking meth was your vice? Or eating your boogers? Or blowing one of those whistles at ICE agents.

Those vices would suck.

I knew a dude in high school who admitted to me that his vice was sniffing women's dirty panties. He would literally sneak in their laundry room and look for the dirty panties and sniff them.

I've heard that some women make money selling their worn panties online.

Anyway, good for them. 

If I could sell my worn boxers for money, I sure would.

Beer time.

Cheers!

Why Are Leftists Obsessed With Anarchy?

Another anarchist recently got killed "peacefully protesting." This one had a pistol.

I don't think anyone supports people being killed by authorities. 

I also think that everyone supports citizen's right to protest. There's nothing wrong with that. But it seems so ironic to use the laws of a nation to protest the very law that makes it a nation: a border.

Without a border, what's a nation?

Anarchists are true believers, I'll give them that. They hate law and order so much they're willing to die for it. That's some serious devotion.

I think we all are subject to the biases of perception. But my perception is fueled by the question: How is the United States a better and safer place to live with millions of illegal criminals residing within it's borders?

Every other country on the planet has borders, with laws to the enforce them. That's the world we live in. Someday that might change, but for now the nation-state is the way of the world.

I recently wrote a philosophical piece titled Is The Search for Meaning Meaningless? The premise can be assumed from the title. 

These anarchists, who are mostly paid agent provocateurs, don't have any meaning in their life. Most of us can relate. The status quo is efficient at dulling the soul. This is why we need God.

Our desire for meaning is God's way of calling his sheep.

John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.

These poor anarchists are mostly overweight, unattractive, single white females and homosexual men.

They have no meaning in their lives. And they seek to fill that void by taking on the struggles of the oppressed. On the surface, this is a noble cause. They are doing what they believe is right, while consequently adding meaning to their life.

In my piece on meaning, I briefly discussed the philosophy of Camus:

Camus concluded that struggle itself providing the meaning to live. That we should accept that life is meaningless and revolt against it.

So our meaning becomes: struggle until you die.

Sadly, our societies have devolved to the point that the youth want to lay down their lives protesting the rule of law. 

These women should be at home, married with children. Smiling and happy. Sad and struggling. Living life as God meant it to be lived.

These homosexual men should be married. Repenting. Working. Struggling to provide. Being a positive example for his children.

It's easy to be divisive, and look at people and pass judgement. 

These anarchists are sad and lonely, desperately looking for a reason to keep on living. Looking for meaning in their life.

They've turned their backs on God. 

It's not my place to speak for the Lord. But maybe God has reciprocated. 

Not everyone will be saved. In fact, most won't be: 

Matthew 22:14: For many are invited, but few are chosen.

We don't choose God; God chooses us:

John 15:16 You did not choose me, but I chose you...

It's not a coincidence that most of these anarchists are coincidentalists. They don't believe in God. In fact, most hate God:

John 15:18–19 If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.

Scripture has all the answers you're looking for: 

Matthew 7:7–8 Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened. 

Don't think for a second that we aren't in the midst of a spiritual war. Satan has an immense legion of minions.

Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

Put on the armor of God:

Ephesians 6:11 & 13 Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes... so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground.

May God have mercy on your soul.

All Glory to the Truth!

UFC 324 Recap: Paddy vs Gaethje

The Paramount+ era has officially begun for the UFC.

Doing away with the PPV model is long overdue. 

$100 to watch 5 fights was always a ripoff. Besides, in the digital age anyone who wants to watch something for free will just find a bootleg stream anyway. I'm not sure what kind of money and resources the UFC put into fighting PPV piracy, but I doubt it was free.

Paramount+ is like $9 a month, or $90 a year. If you're an avid UFC fan, and the UFC will put out quality cards every week, that's not a bad deal. 

Speaking of quality, if you didn't watch it, the Paddy vs Gaethje fight was a real banger. It'll be a fight of the year candidate come December. 

Pimblett came in as a 2-to-1 favorite. I think most people thought Paddy would walk through an aging Gaethje, mostly based on what Pimblett did to Chandler. But he didn't. It was a very close, violent and entertaining fight. 

If you have a chance to rewatch the fight, you should.

Gaethje is aging (37), and has been in a ton of wars. I wonder how "punch drunk" he will be a decade from now. 

Have you heard Chuck Liddell talk recently? I think he might be the poster child for retired fighters staying retired. Luke Rockhold, I'm talking to you.

Nonetheless, Gaethje was in great shape and took it to the younger Englishman. 

Paddy battered Gaethje's with 48 body shots and 25 legs kicks, but they never seemed to take a toll on Justin later in the fight like I thought they would. That was surprising to me.

I remember when Paddy first came on the scene, I couldn't stand him and thought he was way overrated. I thought he lost the fight with Jared Gordon.

I think Pimblett has proven to be quite a bit better than everyone expected.

One has to wonder what the future holds for Gaethje as the interim champion. I didn't think he would beat Paddy. I thought he would look old. But, he obviously has quite a bit left in the tank. That being said, I just don't see him beating Ilia or Arman. 

But he was a 2-to-1 dog to Pimblett. And I think he is 8-3 as the underdog. 

I'm not a gambler, but if I was I wouldn't bet against Gaethje against either of them. In fact, the oddmakers will probably have Gaethje at least a 3-to-1 dog against either of those two. 

I'll leave you with this advice: if Justin fights Ilia or Arman on the White House card and is a big dog (at least 3-to-1), put a few shekels on Gaethje. When you win big, don't forget me. My BTC address is in the sidebar :)

Unillama Piñatasaurus

Most writing today is artificial. I'm one of the few writers left who use real intelligence, instead of synthetic.

There's nothing wrong with AI as a tool. If you're lazy, have writer's block and can't think of anything to say, just type something random into AI (or even just say it, you don't even have to use your fingers). 

My contemporaries could care less. They will say, "I write all my own stuff, too. I just use AI to help me brainstorm." 

But that's not actually true. Run "their" writing through an AI checker and you'll see. Whoever your favorite "writers" are most likely use AI for some, if not most, of their material.

I recently wrote a piece titled, Social Engineers Want AI to Think for You. It's decent. You should read it. It's certainly better than any generic AI slop that you read on your other bookmarked sites.

It doesn't seem like a hard thing to comprehend as to why AI "thinking" and "making decisions" for people would be a bad thing.

But then again, I'm sure most people 20 years ago thought, "Staring at these smart phones all day can't end well for the human condition."

I've often said that knowing is half the battle. The other half is behavior.

It doesn't take "the science" to tell people about the potential downside to staring at a phone all day. Just like it doesn't take geniuses like yours truly to tell you that "artificial" intelligence actively replacing human intelligence probably isn't going to turn out well. 

Well, assuming who you are, I suppose.

Remember, "artificial" just means "man-made." 

It's not like AI is some kind of organic, independent operating system of intelligence. It's been programmed by Man.

Go talk to AI about any controversial social issues and see what it says.

Try to get it to say "bad" words. Not curse words. Of course it will say those. But "offensive" words, that might hurt people's feelings. Maybe not "words," but get AI to discuss the ideas that represent those words. That's probably a better way of putting it.

AI is programmed to indoctrinate you, by thinking for you. It is slowly replacing the modern education system. 

AI is Orwell's Big Brother. He is watching.

To be frank, me writing this is just a waste of time. I mean, not really. I'm a writer, I write. But, from the perspective of people reading this and then deciding that AI is bad and they aren't going to use it, that's not going to happen. 

I'm not an influencer. I just know the answers.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I write for the future. For my legacy. And for my family tree. 

Writers like me are relics. We are a dying breed. Appreciate us while we are still here.