A decade ago, motivated by curiosity
and the quest for camaraderie, I stumbled upon the White Nationalist
forum Stormfront. Contrary to the judgmental view held by the Left
for those who would be interested in such a site, my girlfriend
hadn't left me for a black guy, I hadn't lost my job to a Mexican,
nor had I been outsmarted by a Jew or Asian. I considered myself (and
still do) to be innately racial, which logically transitioned into a
racial realist. I grew up in predominately white suburban America,
and the few non-white students I attended school with over the years
were never belittled or ostracized because of their non-whiteness.
However, only a liar or an idiot would say they didn't see the
differences between them and us. Even if those differences were just
physical observations, they were differences nonetheless. Those
differences shouldn't be polarized in terms of good or bad, rather as
elementary biological and cultural realities of race (not good or
bad, just is). I remember on two separate occasions a black
kid transferred to our school in the middle of the year. As a member
of the football and basketball teams, I knew (and hoped, being a team
first kinda guy) they would play sports, and they did. From my years
of team sport participation, even black kids who weren't that good at
sports were still better than the average white kid, just due to
sheer genetic athletic ability (PEG's – performance enhancing
genetics; e.g. ACTN3). Throughout my many years of team sports, the
biggest problem I witnessed with the black athlete was if they could
keep their grades up in order to remain academically eligible. While
African PEG's can be advantageous in a white society, African IQ's
can be a disadvantage. I personally never had a problem with blacks,
so my identity as a White Nationalist doesn't stem from any hatred
for blacks (although their typical group behavior leaves much to be
desired). That's another myth of the Left, that White Nationalists
are ignorant racists with an inferiority complex (e.g. “you're only
racist because you're jealous of...”). Exceptions to the rule of
social norms created the need for the term stereotype, so I'm
sure there are a few White Nationalists who became such because their
wife banged a Negro while he was at work, and he ended up finding out
about it when she confessed after he tested positive for gonorrhea or
birthed a mulatto.
Speaking of stereotypes, to say I was
pessimistic when I ventured onto Stormfront for the first time was an
understatement. But I quickly realized that, at least in this case,
the stereotype of the toothless redneck with an IQ of 80 wasn't the
norm. As a matter of fact, the intellectual discourse on the forum
drew me in and my identity hence thereafter has been that of a White
Nationalist. It was refreshing to exchange ideas with other
intelligent people who thought similar to myself. However, what I
soon discovered was that there was very little camaraderie, and a
whole lot of dissension. For some it was a virtual toilet bowl for
egomaniacs with anti-social personality disorders who wanted to flush
their inferior opposition by imposing the intellectual dominance of
their virtual alter ego. Perhaps this description is somewhat harsh,
and definitely doesn't apply to everyone, as good faith dialogue can
cement one's worldview with the expansion of knowledge. I learned a
lot in a short time reading through various threads on Stormfront. It
is a great tool, and for many like myself, the intellectual
introduction to White Nationalism. But anyone who has spent much time
on Stormfront knows exactly what I'm talking about.
Over the years, Stormfront's family
tree has grown exponentially, producing a plethora of pro-white/White
Nationalist/Alt-Right/manosphere blogs and websites. The problem is
that the expansion remains virtual and primarily pseudo-intellectual.
When I say pseudo-intellectual, I'm referring to those with an IQ
between 105 and 120 (nothing to scoff at, by any means). Anything
below the 100 to 105 IQ range are the simpleton revolutionary targets
of the intellectual's simplified doctrine. Anything above 120 is the
intellectual class. The pseudo-intellectual has a foot in each realm,
which enables dual citizenship, for lack of a better term. He can
downplay his intelligence when it serves its purpose, and vice versa.
In relevance to our topic, the pseudo-intellectual spends his time
writing above his IQ, using big words to impress his audience and
suffice his ego. It's not that he's not capable of producing highly
academic material, but subconsciously he reluctantly fights the
reality that both feet aren't in the intellectual realm, which cause
him to overcompensate with unnecessary terminology to validate his
work. We've all read the thousand word essay, where in order to
understand the premise we had to reach for the dictionary at least
five times. The intellectual, as the Communist Party understood so
well, always used the most simple of terms to express simple ideas
for the average, or below average, IQ revolutionary. Historically,
it's common for the revolutionary to be illiterate, or of a very
basic educational background. As White Nationalists, we might be
inclined to assume that our revolutionary class is smarter than
revolutionaries of past, but that wouldn't be completely accurate.
Perhaps more educated, but not necessarily smarter. When writing
politically motivated propaganda, the first question one should ask
is, “Who is my audience?” The intellectual's audience is the
revolutionary, not his peers. His work should be centered around
propaganda in simple and easily understood phrases (e.g. – You're
either pro-white or anti-white; Stop White GeNOcide; Illegals are
criminals; etc). The intellectual doesn't need to offer logical,
academic terminology or explanations for two reasons: 1) it would
turn off his audience because he wouldn't understand it, 2) the
revolutionary isn't interested in the why's or how's,
he's an idealist concerned with good and evil. The
pseudo-intellectual's audience is his peers and (he hopes) the higher
IQ intellectuals, with the primary psychological motivation of
approval and acceptance. He isn't motivated by the prospects of
revolution, he is motivated by his ego. There comes a time when we
have to ask ourselves, “why am I doing what I'm doing, and what
difference is it going to make?”
For the last ten years, at least 90% of
what I've read by pro-white writers is the work of
pseudo-intellectuals. That's not a knock against people who are
pseudo-intellectual writers, as they obviously have something to say,
and often say it with great eloquence. The internet forum, such as
Stormfront, is the perfect environment for such expression of
thought. But there are so many sites now that are focusing on topics
that are completely irrelevant to White Nationalism, and more
concerned with traffic. I'm not referring to the satire or parody
that has become common amongst the pro-white right, as this is both
practical and tactical. Ridiculing the enemy is a very effective
tactic, and pseudo-intellectuals would be much more effective to the
cause partaking in trolling as opposed to anything idealistic or
abstract, such as philosophy. Pseudo-intellectuals attract other ego
driven pseudo-intellectuals. Neither they, nor their audience are
revolutionaries. In all practicality, they're for entertainment
purposes only.
Intellectuals need to understand that
the blueprint for successful revolution has already been written, and
they need to focus on simplifying it into good vs evil
idealism for the blue collar personality types that are always
responsible for carrying out the
intellectual's revolutionary plan. Academic pissing contests can be
entertaining for participants and a handful of spectators, but what
purpose do they serve? Do you want a future for white children, or do
you want to fill up the comment section? Everything done within the
cause should be for
the cause. If not, it's ego-driven drivel, which translates into one
word: Hobby.
No comments:
Post a Comment