Sunday Scripture:

 

Romans 4:7-8

Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,

and whose sins are covered;

blessed is the man against whom the 

Lord will not count his sin.

Who are the Experts: Censorship Creates Misinformation

 https://www.eatthis.com/news-doctor-jha-critical-covid-warning/

These next few months will be key ones during the coronavirus pandemic, as cases ebb—but remain at jaw-dopping numbers as we head into colder weather. How can you stay safe and what should you expect going into the chill? Dr. Ashish Jha, Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, tweeted six key points that everyone should hear, no matter your opinions. Read on for all six—and to ensure your health and the health of others, don't miss these Sure Signs You've Already Had COVID....

For the sake of the reader, I'm not going to list the "six key points that everyone should hear, no matter your opinions" given by the "virus expert." If you want to read them, click the cited link.  

The point-of-interest is that the article has even been "fact checked" to ensure that the "opinions" of the "virus expert" comply with the systemic narrative. 

It's pertinent to understand what "fact checked" for "misinformation" actually means. It has nothing to do with facts. It just means that it complies with the narrative; the "facts" are irrelevant. 

If you want to examine the "facts," lets start with the credentials of the article's cited "virus expert": His name is Ashish Kumar Jsa. Here are his "virus expert" credentials, via his Wiki page:

Ashish Kumar Jha (born December 31, 1970) is an Indian American general internist physician and academic serving as Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. Previously, he was a health scholar, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the Faculty Director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, and a Senior Advisor at Albright Stonebridge Group. Jha is recognized as one of the leading health policy scholars in the nation.

Jha's research centers on improving the quality and cost of health care, focusing on the impact of public health policy.

"Jha is recognized as one of the leading health policy scholars in the nation." 

You might ask, "What is a 'health policy scholar'? Is that like another name for "virus expert"? Here is what Wiki says:

Health policy can be defined as the "decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a society". According to the World Health Organization, an explicit health policy can achieve several things: it defines a vision for the future; it outlines priorities and the expected roles of different groups; and it builds consensus and informs people.

Still nothing about Jha's virus expertise. Let's continue to look at his career and education:

Jha graduated from Boonton High School in Boonton, New Jersey as the valedictorian of the class of 1988 and then attended Columbia University. He graduated from Columbia in 1992 with a B.A. in economics. Jha received his M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1997 and then trained as a resident in internal medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. He completed a Chief Residency year at UCSF. Between 2001 and 2002, he served as the Inaugural Under Secretary's Special Fellow for Quality and Safety in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jha returned to Boston in 2002 to complete his fellowship in general medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.

In 2004, Jha completed his Master of Public Health degree at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 

Jha worked as the K.T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the Faculty Director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, as well as a Senior Advisor at Albright Stonebridge Group. On September 1, 2020, he became the Dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. 

In my humble opinion, the facts make Jha look like a career student. 

Nothing I read said anything about virology, immunology or epidemiology. 

Nothing I read would make me think "virus expert." 

Sure, he's probably a smart guy and has a lot of college degrees, but there is nothing with regards to work history that even shows he has ever worked as a doctor (unless you want to count residency and internships, which are pre-reqs for degrees).

He doesn't have a degree in virology, or epidemiology. He's a general internist. Which means he's a family physician who doesn't see children. 

Q: I’m looking for a primary care doctor. What’s the difference between an internist and a family physician?

A: Internists are specialty-trained to treat adults from 18 years old through the geriatric years. They have intensive and comprehensive training in all aspects of adult medical care. Internists specialize in primary care screening and in treating common adult problems, such as diabetes and hypertension, as well as in treating patients with a complex combination of conditions.

Family medicine doctors are specialty-trained to care for people across the lifespan, from birth through the geriatric years. Family medicine doctors have formal training in pediatrics, adult medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, mental health and more. This broad training equips them to deal with a wide range of health problems for the entire family, with a focus on wellness, disease prevention and chronic disease management.

Jha is basically your family doctor who can't see kids, a career student and a consultant. 

To classify him as a "virus expert" is misinformation. 

Sunday Scripture:

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me

Romans 3:10-11:

as it is written:

None is righteous, no, not one;

no one understands;

no one seeks for God.

The Mantra: Anti-Racist = Anti-White

Hypoocrisy always has an agenda: It's usually hate.

https://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Whites have been demoralized by wordism.

Wordism is the concept of using language to moralize and manipulate, as opposed to communicate. 

The most effective word in the wordism arsenal is racist.

Racist is effective because it's a weaponized epithet. Therefore it holds power as a label.

The "R word" (as it should be known) is the "N word" for White people.

In liberal utopianism, hurling epithets based on an identity is immoral.

In liberal utopianism, feelings establish the moral high ground. 

In liberal utopianism, equality is the god of the godless.

Equality only works if all things are equal.

Racism is a zero-sum game, because racism begets racism.

Hypocrisy always has an agenda, and it's usually hate.

The "N words" in liberal utopianism are now the "R words."

Because.....

Liberal utopianism isn't anti-racist, it's just anti-white.

 

Yale Study Shows Natural Immunity Lasts 3x Longer than Vaccine-Induced Immunity

https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2021/10/07/covid-19-reinfection-is-likely-among-unvaccinated-individuals-yale-study-finds/

A recent study at the Yale School of Public Health analyzed immunological data from close viral relatives of SARS-CoV-2 to determine how long natural immunity from infection lasts for unvaccinated individuals.

Jeffrey Townsend, the study’s lead author and Yale professor of biostatistics, explained that it can take several years to collect enough data to determine the rate of reinfection of an infectious disease. This creates a problem for researchers, as COVID-19 has only been actively circulating for about a year and a half. In the absence of sufficient empirical data, a team of Yale researchers and colleagues at other institutions sought to determine the rate of reinfection by analyzing immunological data from SARS-CoV-1, Middle East respiratory syndrome and human coronaviruses. With an understanding of how these viruses evolve and how they are related to each other, the team was able to model the likelihood of reinfection for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

“The overall goal of the study was to provide an answer to a question that at this point in the pandemic would be impossible to answer empirically, which is how long after you’ve been infected by SARS-CoV-2 can you expect to possess immunity against the virus before you become vulnerable to reinfection?” said Hayley Hassler, a research associate at the School of Public Health and one of the study’s co-authors.

The study showed that the duration of immunity is relatively short. According to Hassler, the risk of reinfection is about five percent at three months after the initial infection. After 17 months, that number increases to 50 percent.  

After 5 months, the efficacy of the J&J vaccine is only 3%.

After 6 months, Pfizer's efficacy drops to 20%.

There hasn't been as much data released on Moderna, but early indications show it holds up better, at about 64% at 5 months. This would tend to make sense, considering the Moderna vaccine has about twice the mRNA that the Pfizer shot does. I expect it's efficacy to drastically wane (similar to Pfizer) at about 10-12 months. 

The important thing to note is that natural immunity doesn't hit 50% until 17 months. The only vaccine that would be able to make that claim would possibly be Moderna, and that would be after 3 jabs.

 

#JewishTransPrivilege: Would Rachel be a 4-Star Admiral if He Wasn't Jewish and Trans?

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dr-rachel-levine-now-first-142436504.html

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced the nation’s first openly transgender four-star officer across any of the eight uniformed services of the United States.

Admiral Rachel Levine, who serves as the HHS Assistant Secretary for Health and head of the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) Commissioned Corps, was ceremonially sworn in as a four-star admiral.

Admiral Levine now serves as the highest-ranking official in the USPHS Commissioned Corps and its first-ever female four-star admiral. Admiral Levine will lead 6,000 Public Health Service officers who are dedicated to serving our nation’s most underserved and vulnerable populations.

Today’s historic announcement builds on the accomplishments of LGBTQ+ History Month.

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said that making Levine an admiral is a proud moment for HHS. “She is a highly accomplished pediatrician who helps drive our agency’s agenda to boost health access and equity and to strengthen behavioral health,” Secretary Becerra explained. “She is a cherished and critical partner in our work to build a healthier America.

People in normal societies look at this kind of stuff and have to just shake their head and snicker. 

America has become the butt of the world's jokes. 

I asked a Russian friend once what was the typical stereotype of Americans. She replied, "About 50% black, 50% gay, 85% fat and not capable of deep thought." This was before they pretty much eliminated normal White men from TV. And since the American stereotype primarily comes from the western media, those numbers are probably even higher.

Human societies are hierarchical. The pecking order of those hierarchies are typically established tangibly. But the current hierarchy is based entirely on idealism rooted in feelings. 

Replacing reality with idealism isn't sustainable. Rachel Levine isn't a woman, so he isn't the "first-ever female four-star admiral." He's just the first-ever man who pretends to be a woman that has been a four-star admiral.

So we are starting to see the effects of the proverbial snake that eats its own tail, that is liberal utopianism: Feminism created inferior men under the false premise of equality. Now, trannyism has retook man's claim to superiority over feminism. In other words, men can "transition" into women and regain their superiority, albeit in a deceptive nature.

Ultimately, none of that matters, though. The important part is that we know he is going to do his best to build a healthier America. Because if you look at his track record, you can see all of his amazing accomplishments. This was truly a nomination based on merit. If he had just been a normal man, he would have undoubtedly gotten this nomination, too:

Born on October 28, 1957, Levine was originally from Wakefield, Massachusetts. Her parents, Melvin and Lillian Levine, were both lawyers. She has a sister, Bonnie Levine, who is four years older. Levine is Jewish and grew up attending Hebrew school. Levine earned a high school diploma from Belmont Hill School in Belmont, Massachusetts.

Levine had a fellowship at New York City's Mount Sinai Hospital from 1988 to 1993 where she trained in pediatrics. After moving from Manhattan to central Pennsylvania in 1993, she joined the staff at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. During her tenure there, she created Penn State Hershey Medical Center's adolescent medicine division and eating disorders clinic. She was in charge of the latter when she was nominated for the position of Pennsylvania Physician General in 2015.

In 2015, Levine was nominated by Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Wolf to be Pennsylvania's Physician General. In her capacity as Physician General, Levine signed an order that allowed law enforcement officers to carry the anti-overdose medication naloxone. She has credited the drug with saving the lives of almost 1,000 opioid users who had overdosed. She served as Physician General until 2017.

In July 2017, Governor Wolf appointed Levine as Secretary of Health, and she was unanimously confirmed by the Pennsylvania State Senate.

During 2020 and until January 23, 2021, Levine led the public health response on COVID-19 in Pennsylvania as the state secretary of health. She worked closely on a daily basis with the FEMA director and led a daily press briefing. 

Pretty awesome bio, right? He set up an eating disorders clinic and signed an order for cops to carry Narcan so drug addicts don't kill themselves via overdose.  With those credentials, I'm sure him being a Jewish tranny didn't play any role in the nomination.

Speaking of Jewish tranny, here's an idea: Maybe Rachel is a sociopath who recognized years ago the trajectory America was going with their liberal utopianism and decided to "transition" in order to climb the proverbial ladder. Isn't that what sociopaths do? There lack of morality enables them to bypass the restraints of social norms and focus only on winning. So he basically realized that being a Jew wasn't enough. He needed to add credibility to his resume. So he became a woman and a tranny, thus the trifecta of wokeness. 

Nonetheless, I'm sure Rachel is the most deserving candidate for the position. There's no way he would be nominated otherwise, right? Because we know how much our leaders care about us, and this nomination proves that.

Remember, Rachel and the American elites care about you and your health!

 

 

Sunday Scripture

 

Psalm 107:

33 He turns rivers into a desert,

    springs of water into thirsty ground,

34 a fruitful land into a salty waste,

    because of the evil of its inhabitants.

35 He turns a desert into pools of water,

    a parched land into springs of water.

36 And there he lets the hungry dwell,

    and they establish a city to live in;

37 they sow fields and plant vineyards

    and get a fruitful yield.

38 By his blessing they multiply greatly,

    and he does not let their livestock diminish.

39 When they are diminished and brought low

    through oppression, evil, and sorrow,

40 he pours contempt on princes

    and makes them wander in trackless wastes;

41 but he raises up the needy out of affliction

    and makes their families like flocks.

42 The upright see it and are glad,

    and all wickedness shuts its mouth.

43 Whoever is wise, let him attend to these things;

    let them consider the steadfast love of the Lord.

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Only 3% Effective After 5 Months

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/10/15/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/ 

A new study of breakthrough infections among military veterans found that vaccine protection against the coronavirus had declined by mid-August, when the highly-contagious delta variant emerged as the dominant iteration in the country.

Using data from the Veterans Health Administration, the largest health system in the United States, researchers compared coronavirus infections by vaccination status among 620,000 veterans — representing 2.7 percent of the U.S. population — from Feb. 1 to Aug. 13.

Although the report has yet to be peer reviewed and evaluated, it indicates that virus immunity decreased over time and that its decline was different for each of the three vaccines available in the United States.

According to the study, the greatest waning was presented by the Johnson & Johnson product, with protection falling from 88 percent in March to 3 percent in August. In the same period, it declined for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine from 91 percent to 50 percent. For Moderna, protection fell from 92 percent to 64 percent. 

With breakthrough infection patterns remaining consistent in relation to time, age and vaccine eligibility, researchers pinpointed the delta variant as the “primary determinant of infection.” This virus mutation led to a surge of cases throughout the summer — resulting in overwhelmed hospital systems and stretched resources for treatment in some states.

Hoping to stave off any potential decline in the vaccines’ ability to prevent hospitalizations and deaths, authorities have begun administering booster shots to certain segments of the population. However, researchers warned that breakthrough infections have continued to emerge in vaccine recipients despite the shots’ sustained protection.

“These results demonstrate an urgent need to reinstate multiple layers of protection against infection, such as masking and physical distancing, while also bolstering current efforts to increase vaccination,” they said in the study. 

After 5 months, the J&J vaccine was only 3% effective. Not 30%, but 3%! 

For the J&J to be an effective tool against COVID, one would think you'd need a booster (from a one-and-done vaccine) every 2 or 3 months. 

How was J&J FDA approved? Oh, wait. It hasn't been.

But, the FDA did just unanimously approve boosters for J&J (did they have a choice with 3% efficacy after 5 months? It's either that or just pull it from the market.).

However, according to an article just released by Fake News CNN, J&J says that after boosting at 2 to 6 months, effectiveness jumps to 94%, and doesn't wane like the Pfizer vaccine:

Vaccine advisers to the US Food and Drug Administration voted unanimously Friday to recommend a booster dose of Johnson & Johnson's vaccine at least two months after people get the first dose.

The FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee voted 19-0 to recommend the extra dose for all recipients of the J&J Janssen vaccine, 18 and older. They asked to simplify the original question being posed by the FDA, which had asked the committee to say whether the data showed that waiting six months or longer after getting the first shot would provide an even stronger immune response.

Johnson & Johnson says studies have shown boosting at two or six months can bring that effectiveness up to 94% and it says its effectiveness does not wane over time in the same way that effectiveness from Pfizer's vaccine does.

And the CDC's Dr. Amanda Cohn told the meeting that various studies suggested real-world efficacy of J&J's vaccine was anywhere between 50% and 68%.

Basically, they have no idea what they're even talking about. They just throw numbers out there and the public either gobbles them up, or is like "WTF?" 

If you sequestered these "experts" into several different groups, and told them to come up with the efficacy of these vaccines, you would end up with all different conclusions. And they really wouldn't even be "conclusions" as much as they would be differing hypothesis.

At this point the "experts" (the pharmaceutical companies themselves) could just say their vaccines are 95% effective for 9 months when they're actually only 46.7% effective for 3 months and nobody would know the difference. 

These pharmaceutical reps are just like your local drug dealer who tells you his shit is the best. Then you go down the road to the next one who tells you his shit is the best. 

This is what makes the whole "vaccine mandate" thing so ridiculous. They're like the boy that cried wolf. How anyone could trust these "experts" at this point is beyond the pale. 

Even if you think they're acting in good faith, and really care about you, they've proven themselves to be incompetent time-and-time again. That's not a knock on them, per se. I'm sure this bio-engineering is complicated stuff. But we've devolved into this state of statistical probabilities that is irrational and hypothetical. Individuals don't view themselves as statistics. Governments do that. 

Censorship creates "misinformation" in the same way that the truth exposes a lie. 

 

 

Bill Mitchell Illustrates Cuckservative Boomerism

dems are the real racists! 

What is cuckservative boomerism:

Bill Mitchell got banned from twitter (allegedly over masks, but mostly for being a White Trump supporter "racist"), and what does he do? He joins the free speech site Gab and begins advocating for Torba to ban "racists and nazis."

Why?

Because real "racists and nazis" allow the media to portray MAGA as "racists and nazis." And cucks like Bill can't have that because their mission is to out dem the dems (ie "dems are the real racists").

Boomers like Bill truly believe that if somehow we could just prove that "dems are the real racists" that all the black and brown voters would start voting Republican. They would just say, "No, thanks. I don't want anymore welfare and privileges, I want to MAGA!"  

Cuckservative boomers can't comprehend that demographic change eliminates the ability for MAGA (White people) to "retake the nation." Blacks, browns, Jews, pretty much everybody who isn't White, votes with their tribe. It's called identity politics. 

This is a major blindspot for Cuckservative Boomerism. They're "colorblind patriots" who only see "red, white and blue." 

In a homogeneous society, with a 90% White population, that "red, white and blue" idealism would work. But that idealism created demographic change under the premise of "diversity is our strength." 

Diversity is only a strength if you're anti-White. Or a democRAT!

Every time he posts, he gets "20 comments telling him that he's an idiot." That's because he is an idiot. He's still living in 1975 when his "patriotism" was feasible because the demographics allowed for it. 

When one remains ideologically stagnant, they just become a loser. Bill is a loser. 

He literally uses far-left talking points ("hate speech is not free speech"). He hasn't even been able to figure out the subjectivity of "hate speech" in the sense that "hate speech" is just speech the establishment hates.

He doesn't even understand that "hate speech" is what sets the foundation for mass censorship. 

Any adjective in front of the word "speech" is agenda driven. Bill is to blinded by his boomerism to see that.

"Hate speech" in the status quo is anti-racist. Anti-racist in the status quo is anti-White. If Bill disagrees with that, then Bill disagrees with reality. Thus Bill is delusional.

Replace "Biden" with "Trump" and you have a Pelosi post. 

There is no fundamental difference between Bill Mitchell and Nancy Pelosi. They have the same energy. The same ideas. The same talking points. The same standards of morality. They could literally switch parties tomorrow and nobody would even know the difference.

More idiocy: 

"Folks, they won't let me talk about what I want to talk about, but I still support censorship for those I don't agree with." 

He just doesn't get it. And he never will.

Yea, Bill. All the blacks are switching to MAGA because they hate free shit and don't want the country to become browner. Makes perfect sense. 

All we need to do is just grovel a littler harder to the blacks about illegal immigration. Then blacks will see that the "dems are the real racists" and vote MAGA. Then all the racists (real and dems) will see that Bill had it right all along.

Thanks, Bill.

Why do White People Watch Sports?

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/32384058/jon-gruden-resigns-las-vegas-raiders-head-coach

Jon Gruden has resigned as head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders following reports that emails he wrote over a 10-year period included racist, misogynistic and anti-gay language.

The resignation came shortly after The New York Times reported that Gruden used misogynistic and anti-gay language in numerous emails during a seven-year period. That report came days after 10-year-old emails from Gruden surfaced that included a racist comment about NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith as well as a vulgar criticism of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

Gruden emailed Allen that Goodell should not have pressured then-St. Louis Rams coach Jeff Fisher to draft "queers," referring to former defensive end Michael Sam, a gay player drafted in 2014, according to The Times. The Times also reported that Gruden used an anti-gay slur in several instances while referring to Goodell and used offensive language to describe some owners, coaches and media members who cover the league.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that Gruden, in an email to Allen, said Smith had "lips the size of michellin tires," with the newspaper saying it had reviewed the email in question.

Gruden told ESPN that he routinely used the term "rubber lips" to "refer to a guy I catch as lying ... he can't spit it out." 

 

This is a joke. The NFL is for pussies. And cucks. 

From a cuck's viewpoint, what's the difference between watching black men run with a ball and watching porn?

As a former athlete I can tell you that people talk shit all the time during competition. It's part of the game. If the guy you're competing against has big lips, or crooked teeth or smells bad, you're going to talk shit. That's what men do. But we live in this hyper-sensitized society ran by feminists, where the only thing that matters is the feelings of blacks, jews and bitches.

These busy-bodies go through a dude's emails from 10-years-ago and are like, "uh oh. White man bad."

The guy wasn't even coaching at the time. And all he said was that teams shouldn't be forced to draft "queers." Should teams be forced to draft "queers" just because they do man-on-man anal?  Are "queers" like jews, now? Their label is both an identity and an epithet? What was he suppose to call them 10-years ago? Wasn't "queers" the politically correct term?

And the thing about the black dude's lips was a joke. But look, due to black fragility you just can't make jokes about black people anymore. It doesn't hurt their feelings so much as it hurts the feeling of feminists and jews. 

At the end of the day, this is actually a good thing. Sportsball was always a thing for alpha males to live vicariously through their hometown teams anyway. Now that these feminists are in charge of the National Feelings League, real men are going to find something better to do than cheer on black guys running with a ball on Sundays. Sunday was always for church, food and family, not watching fast black guys run with a ball in their hand on the TV. 

Or maybe get on the internet and make jokes about black guys with big lips, or how queer the NFL is. 

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

#BlackPrivilege: Man Shoots 3 People at School and Becomes the Victim

 https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-high-school-shooting-fighting-life-shot

The victim of the shooting at a Texas high school remains in an induced coma in the ICU as he fights for his life. 

Timothy Simpkins, 18, allegedly shot Zacchaeus Selby, 15, four times with a .45-caliber handgun during a fight that broke out at Timberview High School in Arlington on Wednesday. Calvin Pettit, a teacher who tried to break up the fight, was also wounded in the shooting, and another student was grazed by a bullet. 

Simpkins turned himself in following an hourslong manhunt. Arlington police released him from custody Thursday after he posted a $75,000 bond. He faces three counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, WFAA reported. 

Selby’s family started a GoFundMe to raise money for medical expenses and legal fees as the 15-year-old recovers following two surgeries. Selby was shot in his arm, leg, chest and stomach. He remains on a ventilator and will likely need more surgeries, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported. 

"This was not someone who was out to go and shoot up a school," Cole told reporters. "There’s a distinction between a mass shooter or a mass shooting. These people who are out to harm multiple people, and that’s not what happened here." 

However, Selby’s family stressed that their son was the victim. 

"They’re making Simpkins out to be the victim. My grandson is in the ICU – shot four times," Kathy Selby, Zaccheaus Selby’s grandmother, told KXAS-TV. "My grandson is the victim." 

Remember all the other school shooters that shot 3 people and were out of jail the next day?

To date there have been 171 school shootings in the United States. 

There are only two school shooters who aren't incarcerated. Both of them did 10 years in prison and were released because they were so young at the time (13 and 11) of the shooting (per state mandate).

Bullying is pretty much the consensus motive for all school shootings. Along with psychosis. 

Attorneys are paid liars. That's what they do best. Anyone who believes that an 18-year-old man took a gun to school (isn't that a federal offense by itself? Why no gun charges? You have to be 21 to own a handgun in Texas.) for show-and-tell is an idiot. He shot 3 people in a classroom with an illegal gun that he illegally took to school and the attorney is gaslighting the public by saying, "no, that's not really what happened."

And btw, how does a 15-year-old freshman bully an 18-year-old senior? Maybe it happens. I've never seen it happen. But maybe. I guess. 

Nonetheless, the 18-year-old adult opened fire in a classroom. He is a threat to society, which is why we have jails to begin with. He should do 25 years in prison. If he had done this ten years ago he would already be serving a life sentence. 

What's changed?

The obvious. Black people aren't held accountable for their actions the same way other races are. If this shooter had been a White man and released on bond there would be endless chatter about "white privilege" and "gun control" (if he had shot a black person and made bond, there would also be riots "peaceful protests"). 

Does anyone disagree with that? Seriously, does anyone think if this 18-year-old was a White man who shot 3 people in his classroom that he would be out of jail on bond? Certainly nobody thinks that. 

The entire premise of civil rights began under the guise of equality in the eyes of the law. People should be treated fairly regardless of their skin color. But what has happened is that the dynamic has just shifted from one race to the other. That's because racism is a zero-sum game. The current "racist" regime isn't anti-black, it's anti-White.

What this illustrates is that liberalism is a snake that eats its own tail. Liberal utopianism is based on feelings, conformity and wordism. None of those things are tangible. Therefore all of those things are malleable. 

The truth of the matter is that multiculturalism has failed. Diversity is a weakness. These things are as obvious as the sky is blue. No critical thinker on the planet could objectively analyze the multicultural social experiment in America and come to the conclusion that "diversity is a strength." And that's not even meant from a "racist" perspective, it's just an observable phenomenon. 

The truth is: diversity + proximity = war. 

Anything else is a lie. 

 

 

Scientists Discover How to Use DNA as Hard Drives: 'Millions of Times More Efficient'

https://scitechdaily.com/enzymatic-synthesis-our-dna-is-becoming-the-worlds-tiniest-hard-drive/

Researchers propose faster method for recording data to DNA, showing promise in fields of digital data storage, neuron recording.

Our genetic code is millions of times more efficient at storing data than existing solutions, which are costly and use immense amounts of energy and space. In fact, we could get rid of hard drives and store all the digital data on the planet within a couple hundred pounds of DNA.

Using DNA as a high-density data storage medium holds the potential to forge breakthroughs in biosensing and biorecording technology and next-generation digital storage, but researchers haven’t been able to overcome inefficiencies that would allow the technology to scale.

Now, researchers at Northwestern University propose a new method for recording information to DNA that takes minutes, rather than hours or days, to complete. The team used a novel enzymatic system to synthesize DNA that records rapidly changing environmental signals directly into DNA sequences, a method the paper’s senior author said could change the way scientists study and record neurons inside the brain.

The paper’s senior author, Northwestern engineering professor Keith E.J. Tyo, said his lab was interested in leveraging DNA’s natural abilities to create a new solution for storing data.

“Nature is good at copying DNA, but we really wanted to be able to write DNA from scratch,” Tyo said. “The ex vivo (outside the body) way to do this involves a slow, chemical synthesis. Our method is much cheaper to write information because the enzyme that synthesizes the DNA can be directly manipulated. State-of-the-art intracellular recordings are even slower because they require the mechanical steps of protein expression in response to signals, as opposed to our enzymes which are all expressed ahead of time and can continuously store information.”

Tyo, a professor in chemical and biological engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering, is a member of the Center for Synthetic Biology, and studies microbes and their mechanisms for sensing environmental changes and responding to them quickly. 

With more potential for scalability and accuracy, TURTLES could offer the basis for tools that catapult brain research forward. According to Alec Callisto, also a co-first author and graduate student in the Tyo lab, researchers can only study a tiny fraction of a brain’s neurons with today’s technology, and even then, there are limits on what they know they do. By placing recorders inside all the cells in the brain, scientists could map responses to stimuli with single-cell resolution across many (million) neurons.

“If you look at how current technology scales over time, it could be decades before we can even record an entire cockroach brain simultaneously with existing technologies – let alone the tens of billions of neurons in human brains,” Callisto said. “So that’s something we’d really like to accelerate.”

Outside the body, the TURTLES system also could be used for a variety of solutions to address the explosive growth in data storage needs (up to 175 zettabytes by 2025).

It’s particularly good for long term archival data applications such as storing closed-circuit security footage, which the team refers to as data that you “write once and read never,” but need to have accessible in the event an incident occurs. With technology developed by engineers, hard drives and disk drives that hold years of beloved camera memories also could be replaced by bits of DNA. 

This is some creepy shit.

If you didn't read anything from the cited article, read the following quote:

Our genetic code is millions of times more efficient at storing data than existing solutions, which are costly and use immense amounts of energy and space. In fact, we could get rid of hard drives and store all the digital data on the planet within a couple hundred pounds of DNA.

Remember when the concept of merging of humans with technology was the thing of 80's sci-fi movies?

The next evolutionary leap for mankind is to morph with machines into a race of cyborgs. 

Science is the new religion, and scientists are the new gods.

Not only have we moved into the post-theological society that 19th century philosophers like Nietzsche predicted (ie "God is dead!"), but humanity is also in the midst of a biological evolution as the result of a technological revolution as well.

It's important to implement the systemic narrative into this transition. It's not a coincidence that "climate change" is in the news on a daily basis. This is the catalyst that will bypass the ethics of using DNA as hard drives. In other words, the moral high ground is saving the planet. What could be unethical about that, right? Just like with vaccinations. It's presented as a sacrifice for your fellow man. "Do your part, comrade!"

The important thing to know is that when these scientists are questioned, they will say that they aren't wanting to use the actual DNA of humans as hard drives, but that they are wanting to replicate human DNA outside of the body and use that as hard drives. Even though they explicitly said they want to accelerate the ability to map the human brain by inserting recorders into all the cells of the brain and record the activity. 

Ultimately it all comes down to trust. 

It's hard to process the power of this technology and not be somewhat concerned. If they have the power to hijack human DNA and use it has digital hard drives, what don't they have the technology to do? Furthermore, what are the ethical limitations from stopping them from using CRISPR to create a slave race of humans that are hard drives used as surveillance systems for Big Brother? A cure for climate change, population control and the ultimate, obedient citizen. Sounds like something elites would rub their hands together and salivate over. 

All that microchip and 5G talk doesn't sound all that crazy now, does it?

    

 

 

City of Seattle Enforces Anti-Racist = Anti-White

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10061329/Seattle-invites-city-employees-anti-racist-training-teaches-whites-oppressors.html

The city of Seattle invited non-white civic employees to a three-hour city-funded 'racial inferiority' seminar that excluded white people, new documents reveal.

In contrast, white staffers were taught that they are responsible for racism and should view themselves as 'oppressors.'

The revelation of the segregated seminars endorsed by the city comes after a Seattle radio host uncovered the seminars' contents after filing a public disclosure request to Seattle's city hall for the lesson materials. 

City staffers 'who identify as people of color' were invited to the three-hour 'Internalized Racial Inferiority' session on September 3, after it was organized by the city-funded Race and Social Justice Initiative (RSJI), revealed KTTH radio host Jason Rantz on Monday. 

A similar sister session was offered exclusively to white workers, which taught attendees that they are 'responsible' for racism because of the color of their skin.

The lesson was billed as a way to explore 'the process which American conditioning, socialization and history leads People of Color to internalize racialized beliefs, ideas and behaviors about themselves, undergirding the power of White Supremacy.'   

It also outlined 10 'truths' that must be accepted by city employees, which include, 'colonialism is at the root of white supremacy,' 'Racism is based on the legal and social construction of whiteness' and 'Government has a responsibility to be anti-racist.'

According to the organization's mission statement available on its website, the coalition was designed 'to eliminate racial and social disparities and achieve racial equity in Seattle,' and is currently endorsed by Seattle's mayor, Jenny Anne Durkan. 

The city-run seminar urged employees of color to free themselves of white supremacy influence and dismantle systems of oppression in and outside of the workplace.

Meanwhile, white workers were instructed to affirm their 'complicity in racism.'

The staffers were urged that the seminar was 'a space where we can shed our 'white tears,' and address feelings of 'anger, self-righteousness and defensiveness' associated with being white.

They were similarly instructed to face 'fear, shame and guilt for the harm of our actions,' according to the document. 

White attendees were also urged to abandon the 'guaranteed physical safety' that comes with being white, in order to be considered true 'accomplices' when it comes to creating an anti-racist society. 

You really can't make this stuff up anymore.

The fundamental premise of liberal utopianism is that it's explicitly anti-White. 

Cities -like Chicago and Seattle- that have elected these radically anti-White lesbians to be their leaders are getting exactly what they voted for: 

The odd thing about rejecting white supremacy is that they try to make White Supremacy into an idea, like liberal utopianists do with everything else. But White Supremacy isn't an abstract idea, it's a tangible reality. 

I have no problem with people who want to reject White Supremacy, as long as they aren't usurping it in the process. Nobody is forcing them to shit in a porcelain toilet or take aspirin for their headache. 

If these anti-Whites are serious about their hatred for White Supremacy, here are 10 things they need to openly reject:

1. English Alphabet

2. Human Rights

3. Electricity 

4. Plumbing

5. Modern Medicine 

6. Automobiles

7. Airplanes

8. Science 

9. Feminism

10. Democracy

And if they were really serious about their anti-Whiteness, they would relocate to the Congo and send their complaints with smoke signals from their dunghut. Or even better, they would just live happily ever after.... fending off cannibals with spears while barefoot.  

 

 

It Pays to be Black: Man awarded $137 million for being called Bad Words at Work

 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/05/tesla-pays-137m-black-former-employee

Tesla has been ordered by a federal court in California to pay almost $137m in damages to a Black former employee who said he endured racial abuse while working at a factory in Fremont.

Owen Diaz, a former contracted elevator operator who worked at the plant between 2015 and 2016, alleged he was harassed and faced “daily racial epithets” including the “N-word”. He also said employees drew swastikas and left racist graffiti and drawings around the plant.

On Monday, a jury in San Francisco sided with Diaz, who was awarded $6.9m in damages for emotional distress and $130m in punitive damages, according to Diaz’s attorney, Lawrence A Organ.

“It took four long years to get to this point,” Diaz told the New York Times. “It’s like a big weight has been pulled off my shoulders.”

Organ, of the California Civil Rights Law Group, said: “It’s a great thing when one of the richest corporations in America has to have a reckoning of the abhorrent conditions at its factory for Black people.”

Diaz’s lawsuit claimed that supervisors failed to stop the racial abuse.

“Tesla’s progressive image was a façade papering over its regressive, demeaning treatment of African American employees,” the lawsuit stated.

Shame on all those White Supremacists liberals in silicon valley who tormented this elevator operator with black skin. It always seems like it's the tolerant crowd that is least tolerant, doesn't it?

I've noticed the hypocrisy of the tolerant ones. You know, the "my body, my choice." Or the, "we hate those who hate," nonsense. So, yea, the fact that racists White liberals would call black people bad words and have an anti-White anti-racist worldview isn't ironic.

Can you believe that they even called the man with black skin the "n word" daily to his face? Yea, I find it hard to believe, too, but the jury didn't. I wonder what the demographic breakdown of the jury was. I'm guessing a diverse mix of White feminists, homosexuals and black people.

It's unfortunate that in 2021 we still have to judge people by the color of their skin and not the content of their character. If we had all just adopted the dream of that plagiarist, this nightmare filled with bad words and racial recognition would be a thing of the past. 

Luckily for this elevator operator with black skin, the weight of those bad words have been lifted off of his shoulders after four long years. Just think, if he hadn't been born with black skin, he would have never been called bad words by colorblind racists liberals, and thus he would have never been a multi-millionaire.

How do you think he feels about being called those bad words now? I can see him driving down the road in his brand new Cadillac, with the windows down and some beats thumping, and a big cigar hanging out of his mouth. His face is full of joy and he's never felt prouder to have black skin. He even has a pretty White woman in the front seat who only calls him bad words during sexual role play. 

It's hard to be mad at anyone for gaming the system. I wasn't there, but the idea that a bunch of anti-white anti-racist liberals would call this elevator operator with black skin the "n word" on a daily basis is just preposterous. But in the same breath, if you have black skin and can make $137 million by pretending to traumatized by some liberals calling you bad words, then why not? Especially if you have a race hustler (like his lawyer) for an attorney.

It really does pay to be black in America.

You know what they say: don't hate the player, hate the game.

Styx vs Spencer Debate

 

Entertaining debate.

Spencer has tried to re-brand himself as somewhat of a leftist-ethnocentrist, who supports Biden and COVID mandates. 

Styx basically accuses Spencer of being an accelerationist, in the sense that supporting Biden actually speeds up the decline of the American empire and makes way for balkanization. Spencer denies that. 

Spencer does about 75% of the talking, and Styx just inserts reactionary gotchas along the way. 

It seems that there is a blueprint on how to debate Spencer: just let him talk until he says something stupid and then insert a flamboyant gotcha. Or maybe Styx just knew that it was up to Spencer to prove his point and he could just sit back and chuckle. Even the most hardcore leftists would have a hard time saying Biden is doing a great job, let alone a white nationalist. 

Remember when Biden said "we have hope" because there are so many mixed-raced couples in soap commercials?

Spencer has a lot of haters, as well he should. But he is articulate and has some interesting things to say from time-to-time. Obviously coming out in support of Biden is silly. Nobody takes that serious. But he makes a good point about the MAGA crowd devolving into something way more degenerate and conspiratorial than the Alt-Right ever was. The AR was way cooler than MAGA. That's for sure. 

Spencer thinks the lack of COVID sympathy by Trump cost him the election. He said if Trump would have "shed a tear" over COVID that he would have legitimately won the election by a landslide. I think most people think he did win the election by a landslide. 

Anyway, if you're bored and have a couple of hours to waste, it's certainly more entertaining than watching black men run with a ball. 

Sunday Scripture

Proverbs 27:19  As water reflects the face, so one’s life reflects the heart.

Vitamin D Protects Against Severe COVID

https://scitechdaily.com/more-evidence-that-vitamin-d-protects-against-severe-covid-19-disease-and-death/

New research from Trinity College Dublin and University of Edinburgh has examined the association between vitamin D and COVID-19, and found that ambient ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation (which is key for vitamin D production in the skin) at an individual’s place of residence in the weeks before COVID-19 infection, was strongly protective against severe disease and death. The paper was published in the journal Scientific Reports September 14, 2021.

Previous studies have linked vitamin D deficiency with an increased susceptibility to viral and bacterial respiratory infections. Similarly, several observational studies found a strong correlation between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19, but it could be that these effects are confounded and in fact a result of other factors, such as obesity, older age, or chronic illness which are also linked with low vitamin D.

The Mendelian Randomisation is a particular analytical approach that enabled researchers to investigate whether vitamin D and COVID-19 might be causally linked using genetic data. Few earlier studies attempted this but failed to show a causal link. This could be because UVB radiation sunshine which is the most important source of vitamin D for majority of people was ignored.

Researchers found that ambient UVB radiation at an individual’s place of residence preceding COVID-19 infection was strongly and inversely associated with hospitalization and death. This suggests that vitamin D may protect against severe COVID-19 disease and death. Additionally, while the results from the Mendelian Randomisation analysis weren’t conclusive, some indication of a potential causal effect was noted. Because of the relatively weak link between genetically-predicted vitamin D level that is used for Mendelian Randomisation analysis, it is possible that the number of cases in the current study was too small to convincingly determine causal effect, but future larger studies might provide the answer. 

“Our study adds further evidence that vitamin D might protect against severe COVID-19 infection. Conducting a properly designed COVID-19 randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation is critical. Until then, given that vitamin D supplements are safe and cheap, it is definitely advisable to take supplements and protect against vitamin D deficiency, particularly with winter on the horizon.”

“Our study supports the recommendation of vitamin D supplementation for not only the maintenance of bone and muscle health during the lock down, but also the potential benefits in relation to protection from COVID-19.” 

Moral of the story: get at least 30 minutes of sunlight a day when possible, without sunblock and exposing as much skin as you can. And during the times that absorbing vitamin D via the sunlight isn't feasible, supplement with D3 5000IU, 125mg daily.

If you're looking for a prophylactic regimen, here is Dr. Zelenko's COVID protocol:

Remember when 'Anti-Semites' said Kushner was Calling the Shots?

 https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/574862-grishan-calls-kushner-rasputin-in-a-slim-fitting-suit?rl=1

Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham in a forthcoming book described former President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner as “Rasputin in a slim-fitting suit.”

Grisham, who served as the White House press secretary for nine months, is set to release a new book, “I’ll Take Your Questions Now: What I Saw in the Trump White House” on Tuesday.

In a section of the book that was adapted and published in Politico on Friday, Grisham criticized Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, for involving themselves in White House decisions, including pushing for a national address on COVID-19 last year.

In the adapted section of the book, Grisham describes how she found out about a meeting that was taking place on March 11, 2020, between Kushner, Hope Hicks and White House counsel Pat Cipollone regarding an apparent need for Trump to give an Oval Office address to the nation on COVID-19. The World Health Organization had just designated the virus as a pandemic.

Grisham explained that a meeting occurred several hours later in the Oval Office so Trump could be briefed on the latest COVID-19 updates. During the meeting, Grisham claimed that his daughter, Ivanka Trump, insisted that the president make an address to the nation on the pandemic. 

Grisham also claimed that Kushner had worked with the president’s speechwriter and “dictated” what the president would say in front of the nation. 

"Katie Miller, an aide to the vice president, was married to speechwriter Stephen Miller. So she went into Stephen’s office and sat there while Jared Kushner frantically dictated the address to Stephen, who wrote something out,” Grisham wrote.

The former White House press secretary expressed her frustration at Kushner for involving himself in the speech, saying “the more I thought about it, the more outraged I grew at Jared’s behavior.” 

“He was not an expert on any of those things — shutting down borders, the economic consequences, the health consequences — yet he alone seemed to be deciding the nation’s first actions to address one of the most devastating crises in our history,” she wrote. 

Isn't it odd when "anti-semitic tropes" turn out to be true?

Why do we have to moralize and redefine the truth when dealing with certain groups of people? Why can't it just be, "yea, that's what happened. That was what was going on. This is true."?

By the end of the Trump presidency, pretty much anyone with a pulse could see that Kushner Inc was calling the shots. Predictably, most saw it as Trump's downfall. And it probably was.

Even Trump himself said Kushner was "more loyal to Israel than the US."

"'You know,' Trump joked in another meeting, mocking his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was raised in a modern Orthodox Jewish family and was working on Middle East peace, 'Jared's more loyal to Israel than the United States,'" Woodward and Costa wrote.

And now, the former White House Press Secretary has also validated the "trope," and even exasperated it by going so far as to compare Kushner to Rasputin.  

If you know anything about the history of Rasputin, and the sphere of influence he had over Nicholas II, and particularly his wife Alexandra, then you understand exactly what she is saying about Kushner.  

Rasputin was a peasant who had some charismatic qualities (and a big cock) that he used to charm people (mostly women) into thinking he was an enlightened one. 

He helped "heal" the couple's son, which ultimately won him approval of Alexandra. She viewed him as mystic, with God-like powers. So she began soliciting the peasant's advice on national issues, and coerced Nicholas II to follow his "visions," which ultimately led to the demise of Nicholas II's reign and the beginning of the Russian revolution. 

If you look at what has happened since Biden took office, the comparison of Kushner to Rasputin isn't coincidental, it'll likely prove to be ominously prophetic.