Crypto-Eugenics

All effective socially engineered programs are designed to be multifaceted in order to appeal to a diverse set of perspectives. The goal of social engineering isn't to establish the moral high ground, or to only attract the true believers, but rather to manipulate the attitudes of people on a large scale. There are several examples of social engineering that could be referenced to illustrate the point, but one of the best is illegal immigration.

The catalyst driving illegal immigration is capitalism (max profits via cheap labor). Thus, greedy capitalists fund the social engineers who “muddy the waters” by putting various “baits” in the cultural sphere in order to politically and morally polarize an issue that at the causative core essentially has nothing to do with either politics or morality. But if you were to talk to the average American about the illegal immigration issue, you would get some version of divisive tripe, such as, “Democrats are importing voters. Build the Wall!,” or “Borders are racist! Everyone has a right to be an American.” Meanwhile, there are 30 million illegal immigrants, sanctuary states, $150 billion per year in welfare and social services for illegal immigrants, unprecedented demographic change (88% white in 1970s to 57% white today) and citizens are left scratching their heads trying to figure it all out. They end up hashing it out on social media platforms, arguing about whether or not “White people stole America from the Indians,” or if “Democrats are the real racists,” instead of the fundamental causation. That's social engineering 101.

Another rather obvious example of systemic social engineering is the promotion and endorsement of the transgender/homosexual movement. Back in 2017, at the beginning of the transgender era, I wrote a piece titled The Trans/Sociopath Overlap, in which I presented the hypothesis that there was a large overlap between transgenders and sociopaths:

When you consider that homosexuals and sociopaths represent roughly the same percentage of the population (about 2% of the U.S. population is homosexual), and exhibit many of the same personality traits and characteristics (narcissism, high suicide rates, Machiavellian, disregard for personal safety, etc) it's almost analytically impossible to ignore the possibility that there may be a huge overlap between the two groups. In fact, the majority may be one in the same. This observation led me to pose the following hypothesis: All sociopaths are LGBTQ, and most LGBTQ are sociopaths.

It goes without saying that sociopaths are generally bad for a society (although from an evolutionary standpoint sociopathic traits have a reproductive advantage). Sociopaths transitioning into transgenders eliminates that reproductive advantage, and could drastically decrease the number of sociopaths in future generations. I'm not the only one who knows this, people in positions of power are aware of this too.

Interestingly, Google deleted that piece from its original publication source several years after it had been published, which highlights the depths of the systemic collusion that is mandatory for the regulation of nonsensical ideas (modern day book burning). Dissenters who refuse to conform to the new truth are censored, slandered and accused of “spreading misinformation.” That means they really don't want any negative opinions or views to be accessible to the public, even though it's blatantly obvious to pretty much everyone that individuals with their souls “trapped” in the wrong body are experiencing a permanent out-of-body experience. If you were permanently trapped in your neighbor's house, painting the outside a different color doesn't magically make it your house.

Furthermore, if you were to be examined by a medical professional and you said you were a specific person trapped in the wrong body (e.g. “I'm John Lennon trapped in Jane Doe's body.”), you would be institutionalized immediately (or at the very least, diagnosed with mental illness and heavily medicated). But as long as the person being held hostage in the wrong body is just the wrong gender, then that's perfectly understandable. The hostage negotiators (doctors) get called in, and once the ransom is paid, they cut the penis off to liberate her soul. Never mind the fact that every honest doctor knows that scalpels don't cure psyche issues, instead it actually exasperates psychological distress:

So-called "gender-affirming surgery" could lead to potentially dangerous mental health effects, a new study has found.

Transgender individuals face "heightened psychological distress," including depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation, "partly due to stigma and lack of gender affirmation," as stated in the study, which was published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine.

They determined rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation and substance-use disorders were "significantly higher" among those who underwent surgery, assessed two years later.

Males with surgery had depression rates of 25% compared to males without surgery (11.5%). Anxiety rates among that group were 12.8% compared to 2.6%.

Just as with the illegal immigration issue, the “powers that be” aren't ignorant to reality. While collectively many pretend to be, individually they know the same thing that you and I know: transgenders are schizophrenics and homosexuals are sexual deviants. Therefore, the question becomes: Why do they enable and promote LGBTQ if it isn't a positive for society? The answer to that question is that it does do something positive for society. LGBTQ is a state-sponsored eugenics psyop (cryptoeugenics) designed to bring undesirables out of the closet, and consequently, out of the gene pool.

The innovation of modern medicine has allowed seeds the were to have never sprouted to bear fruit (IVF, fertility surgery, artificial insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, etc). And not only due to leaps and bounds in the medical field, but the massive decline of war and famine, along with the luxuries of modern civilization, have eliminated most of the evolutionary pressures associated with natural selection. These by-products of modernity, combined with technological advancements like automation and AI, are doing the same thing to the human workforce that the cotton gin did to slavery. In other words, kings don't need armies, factories don't need workers and the family farm doesn't need twelve kids to operate.

It's important to note that there's a fine line between the correlation of eugenics and depopulation theory. While eugenics (the aim to improve the genetic quality of the human population) and depopulation theory (the aim to reduce the human population) may on the surface seem to be mutually exclusive, they are not. Rather, when merged, they are mutually inclusive. Those in power who are responsible for the social engineering taking place are both eugenicists and depopulationists. To be more precise, cryptoeugenics is the practice to both better the stock and decrease the population simultaneously (quality > quantity).

There are a plethora of reasons behind the motivations for depopulation. Towards the end of the COVID pandemic, I wrote a rather extensive depopulation thesis titled Depopulation for Dummies, that was published on several notable sites, in which I elaborated in great detail on the motivations for depopulation by elites. In the midst of doing so, I developed the following thesis using the Hegelian Dialectic (problem, reaction, solution):

The PTB have scientifically reached the conclusion that human overpopulation has placed the planet in an existential crisis. They’ve determined that if drastic population control measures aren’t enacted soon, irreparable damage to the planet and its ecosystem is inevitable. They intend to address this issue in three phases: 1. Socially-engineered sterilization, 2. Technological escapism, 3. Space Emigration. We are in Phase 1 and on the verge of entering Phase 2.

Before you pass off depopulation as some cooky conspiracy theory, I highly encourage you to read the piece. Not as a solicitation of my work, but because I quoted at least 15 very powerful elites who are on record making statements regarding overpopulation. Including one of the world's richest men, Jeff Bezos, who founded a company called Blue Origin, in which he predicted that earth will soon become a nature reserve.

Amazon Founder and space explorer Blue Origin owner Jeff Bezos, recently forecasted that Earth will soon become a “natural resort.”

According to a WION report Bezos said, this planet will soon turn into a natural resort because only a few “will be allowed to stay here in the future.”

During the annual Ignatius Forum in Washington DC, the billionaire also said, the Earth is special and “we cannot ruin it.”Talking about Blue Origin, his new firm, Bezos explained the experts are aiming to make sure that millions of people get to not only work in space but be born and call space as their first home, as well.Bezos also explained millions of people will move from Earth to space over time. More so, it is the vision of Blue Origin to make millions of people work in space.

For hundreds of years, he added, most, or many of the people “will be born in space.” It will be these humans’ first home. More so, they will be born in these colonies, not to mention, they will live in such colonies.

These people may visit this planet the way one would visit a national park, forecasted Bezos. He believes the space colonies in the future will have forests, wildlife, and rivers of their own, a similar Republicworld.com report said.

Describing his prediction, Bezos said this planet can support, for example, 10 billion people to a certain level. He elaborated they’d have to work quite hard to find out how to do that without degrading the Earth. Ge added the solar system can “support a trillion people.”Even though the billionaire is relatively positive about taking humanity to space and keeping this planet for a selected few, he was uncertain about claiming who is to decide who’s staying on this planet.

The collaboration of eugenics and depopulation is self-evident when viewed through the lens of motivation. All social movements of relevance require motivation. This is why AI will never take over the world: it lacks the innate sense of motivation to do so. Even the most elementary analysis of the establishment's promotion of LGBTQ should reveal that it's something way more sinister than a love for sodomy and schizophrenia. When the emotional charge is extracted from the equation, the only tangible sum of the rainbow pride initiative is negative birth rates.

Certainly there are other arguments to be made regarding the establishment's endorsement of LGBTQ. It's definitely not a accident that the rainbow is their banner, and “pride” their mantra. In the Bible, the rainbow serves as a visible reminder of God's covenant to preserve life on earth (Genesis 9:8-11). And even those who don't know scripture are aware that anti-pride is one of the central themes of the Bible, illustrated explicitly in the proverb, “Pride goeth before destruction...” (Proverbs 16:18). The irony itself is so overwhelming that the cognitive dissonance leaves you analytically cross-eyed. To the objective observer, this alone should clue you in that something is going on behind the scenes that doesn't translate into, “We don't have any ulterior motives, we just love gay people because they're gay.”

Of course, there is a spiritual component to this. It's not a coincidence that there is a mockery of Christianity within a sect of the establishment. The blasphemers have their own agenda (they hate Jesus Christ). There's obviously an element of truth to that. Just as there is an element of truth that some of those who are in favor of illegal immigration support white genocide. As I stated previously, this is an example of sound social engineering. The issue is polarized emotionally and packaged as a badge of honor for the recipient to pin proudly on their chest for all to see. It wouldn't be social engineering if there wasn't a smoke screen. The peasantry would understand that greedy capitalists are responsible for lower wages, higher taxes and white genocide. And LGBTQs would realize that they're being gaslighted into not reproducing, in what is essentially a modern day MK Ultra experiment using homosexuality practices as birth control in place of psychoactive drugs to illicit confessions during interrogations.

The science has concluded that sexuality is fluid. Therefore, contradictory to the accepted idea that sexual orientation is genetic, LGBTQ is a sexual behavior directly attributed to an individual's free will.

Research indicates that sexual orientation is not a matter of choice but rather a combination of genetic and biological factors. For instance, studies have shown that there are genetic markers associated with sexual orientation, such as the Xq28 region on the X chromosome. However, a large-scale genetic study involving nearly half a million people found no single gene or handful of genes that predict same-sex sexual behavior, suggesting that genetics may have a limited contribution to sexual orientation.

To understand how manipulative social engineers are, read the above cited paragraph carefully. While you'll certainly catch the obvious contradictory double-speak, notice the mention of “genetic and biological factors,” but no mention of any environmental factors. Yet we know that social engineering is primarily responsible for converting almost 40% of Gen Z (18-24) to LGBTQ. Historically, the percentage of homosexuals within the population has consistently been around 2%. Even if you take the highest estimates, like those of Alfred Kinsey in the 1940s, who estimated that roughly 10% of the population was homosexual (Kinsey was one of the first people to acknowledge sexual fluidity; his methodology was discredited due to disproportionately polling prisoners and male prostitutes), that's still significantly less that 40%, which is an astonishing figure. What will those numbers be in five years? How about 50 years?

LGBTQ as a cause is social, but as an effect it's undeniably evolutionary. This begs the question(s): if LGBTQ is in fact a state-sponsored cryptoeugenics psyop, does that change the way you feel about the systemic sponsorship of homosexuality? Should right-wingers start zealously waving the rainbow flag as if we've scored an evolutionary touchdown? What if it eliminates 90% of sociopaths from the gene pool, and like abortion did for NYC in the 1990s, drastically reduce murder and overall crime rates? Maybe leftists are right, and the power structure is rooted in white supremacy.

In conclusion, a rational way to objectively analyze the “LGBTQ is a state-sponsored cryptoeugenics” is to ask yourself this: If you wanted to discreetly implement a depopulation by eugenics program that required voluntary participation, and you wanted to attract as many susceptible people as you possibly could, how would you do it?

A wise man once said: you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar.