Don't blame Kaepernick. He's just a Kid in the Candy Store

Colin Keapernick is a below average NFL quarterback. His play isn't getting him any attention so his source of identity is fading away. In desperation he is attempting to remain relevant by riding the coattails of controversy. In the status quo, what is more controversial than a millionaire mulatto complaining about racial inequality?

A product of his white mother's jungle fever and his black father's absenteeism, Colin was placed up for adoption at 5 weeks old. Seen as an unwanted trophy, a colorblind white couple adopted Colin with the desire of making him a colorful addition to their family tree. Raised in suburbia, he experienced a white lifestyle free of daily drive-bys and carjackings. But like so many other mulattoes, they are confused by their lack of identity. For obvious reasons, they can never identify as white (white + non-white = non-white), thus develop a self-hatred for their whiteness. In doing such, they overcompensate in an effort to appeal to their blackness (i.e. the black community). A lifetime of confusion festers into an inner hatred of self, and they painstakingly seek to latch on to the antithesis of their rooted self-hatred. Had Colin been raised black, this inner turmoil would likely not have manifested because he would have been accepted as black by blacks (albeit a light-skinded brotha). But even more importantly, he would have never viewed life standing outside the window of whiteness looking in. It's like a kid who was taken to a candy store everyday, given one small piece of candy and then forced to watch the other kids eat all the candy they desire. Eventually he would start hating the kids, the candy and the candy store so much that he would become rebellious, and in rare cases the fanatical spokesman for the kids who didn't ever get to eat candy (elevated IQ due to white genetics makes this possible for mulattoes like Colin, whereas typical black behavior would be more primitive: beat kids up, steal candy, rob store - in retribution, of course).

The common denominator of notable "black" leaders is their exposure to whiteness (genetic, environment, culture, etc). Their envy (unhappy admiration) is equivocated into a systemic inequality issue by Marxist provocateurs. Their entire worldview becomes a projection of disdain instead of a reflection of reality: A blame game whose mantra is "he hate me" with a psychological genesis of "I hate me." The kids in the candy store who get to eat all the candy they want don't necessarily hate the kids who don't get to eat candy, they just like eating candy. Obviously, they're going to interact with the other kids who are in the store eating candy with them. It's the kids who don't get to eat candy that are fueled by hatred and jealousy. The kids who get to eat the candy understand that they must eat candy in moderation and brush their teeth afterward. When the candy store owner decides it's not fair that some kids don't get to eat candy, he starts charging more for his candy so all the kids can eat candy. The kids who never got to eat candy before don't understand the responsibility that comes with being able to eat all the candy they want. They overindulge and become fat diabetics with rotten teeth. The fanatical spokesman (mulatto with higher IQ who only ate one piece of candy a day) reemerges and this time focuses his hatred on the store owner. He'll claim obesity, diabetes and rotten teeth wouldn't have happened if the store was owned by one who had never eaten candy. He will organize protests and boycotts of the store and its prejudiced owner. The store owner will publicly apologize for his altruistic misdeeds and beg forgiveness in effeminate beta fashion.

In a perfect world, all kids would get to eat all the candy they want and have the impulse control to do it responsibly. Unfortunately, life isn't fair and equality is relevant in mathematics, not humanity. The problem with mulattoes like Kaepernick who become social justice warriors is that their projection of hatred blinds them from accountability. They never talk about the missing black father phenomenon. They don't talk about black-on-black violence. If they're asked about black crime statistics (Why is 12% of the population responsible for over 50% of all crime?) they say the statistics are skewed on behalf of some systemic white supremacist conspiracy. They totally disregard that 84% of all interracial crime is black-on-white. They don't acknowledge lower IQ averages, or the fact affirmative action programs give them advantages that other groups don't get. They never contemplate separating from white society, because being "oppressed" in a white society is far better than living in a black society. Again, it's all projection and zero reflection. As Sun Tzu says, to know your enemy you must know yourself – the mulattoes' enemy is himself.

The moral of the story is don't blame Kaepernick for his confused hatred of whiteness, blame his irresponsible mother and her conditioned case of jungle fever. She's the one who wanted the black sex, but didn't want the black baby. It's not the black father's fault, he's just a by-product of evolution - sexing as many women as possible when not sitting under a tree waiting for food to fall on his head. If you're content on casting blame, blame those responsible for the epidemic of jungle fever. If impressionable white women didn't think it was trendy to bed blacks, men like Colin wouldn't be burdened with abandonment, self-hatred and confusion - they would just be normal.