https://www.yahoo.com/news/latina-doctor-wanted-spark-trust-110050945.html
Alicia Carrasco could feel her arms getting tired from the weight of her 1-year-old son, Joaquín. She looked over across the room at her husband who was holding the baby's twin brother, Nico.
The boys clocked a low-grade fever earlier that morning. They were fussy and tired, and refused to leave their parents’ arms without a tantrum.
On days when her sons get sick, Carrasco is normally filled with worry. But this day she was relieved, because it meant their little bodies were likely building up immunity to protect them against COVID-19.
“I felt guilty over how happy I was that they got sick, but now it’s a huge weight off my shoulders,” she said.
There are no authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. for children younger than 5 years old. But kids like Carrasco’s twins and 3-year-old son, Matías, who participated in Moderna’s trial, are helping to change that.
“They were definitely sleeping a lot more the next day, fussy and had spiked fevers,” she said. “Nothing major, and it went away 36 hours after the shot.”
Matías also takes pride in protecting his vulnerable family members. He often boasts of his bravery at the doctor’s office and the toys his parents buy with the money they’re given for participating in the trial, which they jokingly refer to as his “blood money.”
“He goes, ‘Grandmama, I get to see you and you get to visit because I went to the office,’” Carrasco said. “He gets super proud of the blood draws and being a big boy there.”
What's the deal with injection-obsession?
Her babies likely got sicker from the injections than they would have from COVID.
Any parent who boasts about using their babies as Big Pharma guinea pigs is a sick individual.
It comes down to common sense combined with a little critical thinking (i.e., risk/reward). What is a bigger risk to those babies? Injecting an experimental gene-editing serum into their body, or them catching COVID?
I certainly don't have any objections to adults taking injections, if that's what they want to do. But when you boast about injecting your 1-year-old twins with experimental serums, and are relieved when they get sick, you're twisted.
Furthermore, the USA Today acting as if this lady is some kind of virtuous hero is pathetic, and exactly why people have no respect or trust for them.
Anyone with any common sense would ask the question: "They're only 1. Are you sure using your babies as Big Pharma guinea pigs is the right thing to do as a parent? I know I wouldn't do that with my babies. Have you not seen Dopesick?"
What kind of story is the USA Today going to publish if those babies develop some kind of health issues? Or, if they end up catching COVID anyway?
Not to be redundant, but those babies were effectively at zero-risk of having any issues from COVID. To have that much faith in Big Pharma - considering Big Pharma's track record, and the limited amount of time to examine potential side-effects from this new technology - is truly amazing. It's essentially zero reward and all risk.
Injection-obsession is a very weird thing to observe and process.
Please don't use your 1-year-old child as a guinea pig, or as a virtue-signalling prop.
No comments:
Post a Comment