The U.S. Supreme Court’s new majority boldly signaled with twin rulings this week that public opinion would not interfere with conservative plans to shift the nation’s legal landscape.The court rejected Roe v. Wade, a 49-year-old legal precedent that guaranteed the right to an abortion, after a string of national polls showed a clear majority of Americans wanted the opposite result. A similar court majority invalidated a 108-year-old New York state law restricting who can carry concealed guns that is supported by nearly 8 in 10 New Yorkers, according to a recent poll by Siena College.Rather than ignore the dissonance, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the majority in the abortion decision, attacked the notion that the court should consider the public will. He quoted late chief justice William H. Rehnquist from a previous ruling: “The Judicial Branch derives its legitimacy, not from following public opinion, but from deciding by its best lights.”
The language of leftism is lying.
Although leftists control the information systems in the United States, they have had a terrible time with getting people to trust what they say. One could make the argument that it's actually worse to have control of the information systems in a society that the majority of people don't believe your information than it is to be the censored and oppressed side.
The point I'm trying to make here, is that there have been a lot of issues in society that were passed through that weren't supported by public opinion: gay marriage, school de-segregation in the south, abortion, etc. But now that it has happened with abortion and guns, it's all of a sudden a terrible thing. So everyone who has critical thinking skills reads this information and says, "hmm, it seems like they're mad or something."
Journalism was always suppose to be ethical with the point of just telling people what happened. Saying that something is bad because a random poll says "8 in 10 New Yorkers" don't support it is just tabloid junk gossip. It means absolutely nothing.
Furthermore, the narrative is always spun to make the liberal agendas the "good side." For example, the abortion debate. Single white women have been told that it's their body, so it should be their choice. On merit, that's just propaganda that doesn't really make any sense. But if you wanted to critique that concept from a logical perspective, that result would be: "Yea, OK. But you already made the wrong choice by not being able to refrain from your sexual desires for 3 days out of the month. So why should society think you are capable of making the right choice when it comes to killing your child?"
In a society with an honest media, that would be the narrative. There would be a critique of silly propaganda, not the promotion of it.
It really isn't any different than a mentally delusional person demanding the "choice" to jump off a bridge because he has the "right" to fly.
I've already written a pretty good piece on the abortion issue, so I won't go into it much. But it's important to understand that feminism isn't possible without abortion, which is why it's such a big deal:
Feminism can't exist without the option for abortion. Because women can't be completely sexually liberated without it. If women are held responsible for their promiscuity, then they can't be feminists, because they'll be home feeding their sex trophies. More so, they know that raising a kid on their own isn't easy, so they will look to bring in a man to help. That dynamic is known as a family. And families are what feminism is designed to destroy.
Women seem to think that men are taking their "right" to kill their child. But women never seem to grasp the concept of "rights." Where do they think "rights" came from? Do they grow on trees in the backyard? Do they become a piece of the human genome at conception? Or did white men come up with the concept when they were creating western civilization using white supremacy? In other words, the only reason women have any "rights" to begin with is because white men decided to give them "rights." The concept was based on "God given rights." Yet, these women are atheists. So, again the premise of rights was based on God and implemented by Man, but atheistic, misandrist women somehow think they should have a say in the matter.
Job 1:21 Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither: the Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.
The liberal media also does this kind of gaslighting with gun control. They never, ever address the disproportionate amount of black gun violence. Or what gun violence data would look like if you excluded black gun violence. They just seed dumb propaganda that insinuates guns are the problem, and not the people shooting them. Speaking of which, the vast majority of black gun violence is committed with illegal guns. Again, it's just a really silly argument to be like, "Yea, if we made it harder for white people to buy guns legally, black people wouldn't kill so many people with illegal guns."
When you talk to people like they're stupid, only stupid people are going to listen.
No comments:
Post a Comment