Kansas Votes To Give Women The Right To Have Sex Without Any Consequences

https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article264116816.html

The nation now knows, and the world: Kansas remains a free state. 

In a stunning display of common sense, Kansas voters Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a constitutional amendment that would have put abortion policy completely in the hands of the Legislature, and the governor. 

It was a victory on several fronts. First, and most important, it was a victory for women. Kansans said in a loud, unmistakable voice that women can and should be trusted with the most intimate questions of their own health and safety. 

It was also a victory for voters, who defied predictions of a low turnout and cast ballots in churches, gyms, city halls and community centers. Many voted early. Voters were able to dissect puzzling ballot language, purposely designed to confuse and intimidate. 

They rejected false nonsense from anti-abortion groups, including several ludicrous attempts to link the vote to so-called critical race theory, or defunding police. A last-minute text message, apparently authorized by a group run by former U.S. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, was quickly disregarded as a bald-faced lie.

There are two trains of thought regarding abortion:

1. Why bring unwanted children into the world?

2. Legalizing murder

The "my body, my choice" is just silly propaganda that dingbat women latch onto as if it actually means something. 

I've written about the social implications of of abortion (from a cause and effect POV), which is that pure feminism can't exist without the complete sexual liberation of women. 

The idea that women who can't make the right choices about their sexual behavior should be able to make the right choice about the existence of their children is preposterous. They can't seem to make the correct choice to refrain from having unprotected sex for just 3 days out of the month, but they can be expected to make the right choice when it comes to ending the life of their unborn child. Makes sense, right?

While I personally agree that women like this probably shouldn't be reproducing in the first place, they shouldn't just get free passes to kill their sex trophies. Murder should come with some form of consequence. Most notably, sterilization. If a woman wants to kill her child, she shouldn't be able to have children. How does that not make sense? She obviously wants to have sex, but doesn't want to partake in the responsibility that comes with sex.

Most people forget the purpose of sex. It's like sex has become a sport or something. Sex exists for one reason: reproduction. Why do women who don't want children have the desires to have sex? 

Before you say, "yea, but what about men?" let me remind you that men aren't the ones having abortions. And if they are complicit in an abortion, they should be sterilized, too. 

Child murder (aka abortion) should be signed off by BOTH parents. A woman shouldn't be able to kill a man's child without his permission. Can we at least agree on that? And if the father consents to the death of his child, then he should be sterilized, too.