Sunday Scripture

Job 25:1-6

"God is powerful and dreadful. He enforces peace in the heavens. Who is able to count his heavenly army? Does his light not shine on all the earth? How can a mere mortal stand before God and claim to be righteous? Who in all the earth is pure? God is so glorious that even the moon and stars scarcely shine compared to him. How much less are mere people, who are but worms in his sight?"

 

What Is A Woman?

After Stephen Breyer announced he was retiring from the Supreme Court in January of 2022, Biden fulfilled his 2020 campaign promise to nominate a black female for the position. While every rational person sees the problem with electing someone based on their skin color and/or gender, the nominee (Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson) should also feel somewhat disrespected for being chosen predicated on a campaign commitment to elect a black woman (not a particular black woman, just a black woman), instead of her professional and personal merit.

Not to out-democrat the democrats, but black female privilege literally got her nominated to a position when other marginalized groups are still lacking representation (Judge Clarence Thomas is black). Which means that without that privilege there's a 99.9% chance that she wouldn't have been nominated otherwise. In other words, if we're being honest, she's basically an affirmative action hire. That's not intended to be disrespectful, because if you think about it, how is it not just as racist/sexist to hire someone primarily based on their race/gender, as it is to disqualify them because of it? Is it not essentially the same premise? Nonetheless, privileges of any sort that are founded on race and/or gender don't represent American values. Isn't that what has been drilled into every American brain for the last 50 years?

To muddy the waters even further, during her confirmation hearings Jackson said that there should be more women judges. In response to that statement, she was asked to define what a woman is, to which she replied that she couldn't, because she isn't a biologist:

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said at her confirmation hearings Tuesday that more women should be on the federal bench.

But she stumbled when asked for a definition of “woman.”

In an exchange with Sen. Marsha Blackburn, Judge Jackson evaded the question when the Tennessee Republican asked her “can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?”

Judge Jackson repeated the question before replying “no, I can’t.”

The senator asked her back, “you can’t?”

“Not in this context,” Judge Jackson replied. “I’m not a biologist.”

A disbelieving Ms. Blackburn then said that “the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?”

It begs the question as to what she meant when she said that more women should be federal judges. Did she mean more people who identify as women, or more people who are biologically women? Because biology doesn't recognize men as women. Therefore, according to Jackson's response, she obviously knows that. So it will be interesting to see her future rulings when such cases arise.

However, therein lies the existential problem with the ideology of liberalism: it's a proverbial snake that eats its own tail. Judge Jackson wants more women judges, but she knows the hyper-liberalized system that enables radical feminism to flourish is the same system that doesn't define women biologically. Because you don't need to be a biologist to be able to define what a woman is; a 3-year-old could do that. So, it's not that she didn't know the answer, she just didn't want to say the wrong thing (yet she did anyway).

Some may find it comical that a woman nominated on the basis of womanhood doesn't know how to define what a woman is. But the more concerning issue is that this particular woman is also going be about as influential in shaping the social landscape of American society over the next 30 years as any person in the country. Not too mention that her ideas are going to be very persuasive with regard to how people define apparent abstractions like “woman” moving forward.

We know Judge Jackson leans heavily liberal, so it's rather obvious that her voting record will represent that (after all, that's why she was nominated, right?). Thus, her voting record will be considered controversial in the eyes of centrists and conservatives. This controversial voting record will illicit predictable conservative “gotcha” responses when hot-button rulings are passed down (e.g.,“Yea, well, what do you expect from someone who was asked in her confirmation hearings what a woman was and she said she didn't know because she was a woman, not a biologist.”). Sadly, it'll be yet another running joke (like the Jewish man who became the nation's first woman 4-star general and was named USA Today's Woman of the Year) attributed to the status quo that is America's liberal democracy.

Although liberalism is an ideology, it became tangible when it was implemented as a governing social system for Americans, which in turn manifested into the antithesis of its ideological purpose: it became hierarchical. One of the key components (if not the key component) of liberalism is feminism. But as you can see, the hierarchy of liberalism is even more oppressive to women than the patriarchy ever was. While modern feminism just created inferior men, neo-liberalism one-ups that by making men superior women.

Without the feminist aspect of liberalism, the patriarchy would likely still be thriving in America. Instead, feminists failed to foresee that by embracing the abstract idea that they were actually just men without penises, they ultimately opened the door for the other “men without penises” to become the new feminists. That's how ideology works when it isn't supported by logic and reason. Liberalism has devolved into the battle for oppression, and nobody is going to be more oppressed than people enslaved in the wrong body. Sorry ladies.

Speaking of people trapped in the wrong bodies, that very idea shows the destructive nature of ideology when supported by people in positions of power. The simple fact that you can convince unstable, suicidal people (the essence of transgenderism is suicide by proxy) that their soul/conscious was somehow misplaced by God/evolution exemplifies the upmost importance of integrity amongst our lawmakers. If the highest lawmakers in the nation don't know what a woman is, then legally how does a nation know what a woman is?

This brings us back to the heresy of Judge Jackson's statement about not being a biologist. Liberalism recognizes ideas over reason. More precisely, if biology was how we defined a woman, nobody would have asked Judge Jackson to define what a woman is in the first place. The biological definition of a woman has never changed. So she didn't just make herself look ignorant by saying she didn't know what a woman was, but she also deferred to biology as to the definer of gender, which is contradicting to her ideological worldview. More so, these are the kinds of problems that can occur when people are hired due to anything other than merit. A Supreme Court judge shouldn't be flustered by simple questions.

It's not known if Jackson's race and gender were influential in her admission to Harvard Law School, but Tucker Carlson has been vocal about democrats being tight-lipped regarding Jackson's LSAT scores (Law School Admissions Test). For all intents and purposes, those scores would give us a really good idea of how “great” her legal mind is. That's not to say it's not; maybe it is. But shouldn't the Biden administration want to show that they just didn't hire her because she is a black woman, but rather because she deserved it?:

“Biden, sounding maybe a touch defensive, has described Ketanji Brown Jackson as one of this country’s great legal minds. And we certainly want to believe that. For, for real, given that she’s probably gonna be confirmed no matter what we think,” Carlson said during his Fox News show on Tuesday.

“The question is, is it true? Is she really one of this country’s great legal minds? One way to know, one indication would be her LSAT scores,” Carlson continued. “The LSAT is not a knowledge test. It measures logic and reasoning abilities. And no one doubts it’s an accurate measure of those things, which predict legal skills.”

“And that’s why top law fir- top law schools have long used that test. So how did Ketanji Brown Jackson do on the LSAT? Sorry. You’re not allowed to ask. Because asking is racism,” Carlson concluded.

It's quite evident that if Jackson had high LSAT scores that the liberal news outlets would have told us all about it. It doesn't take a political scientist to figure that out. So we can accurately assume that they weren't remarkable. In fact, according to her Wikipedia page, the summary of her Harvard accolades are as an improv comedian, and a referenced time when she headed a “protest” against a fellow student for displaying a confederate flag in his dorm window (Is publicly harrassing a student because you don't like the flag he has in his window “protesting” or bullying?):

After high school, Jackson studied government at Harvard University. She performed improv comedy and took classes in drama, and led protests against a student who displayed a Confederate flag from his dorm window.

The creed of liberalism is social progress, with the goal to move onward and upward in the quest for utopia. To change the antiquated evil and replace it with universal good. This is liberalism in theory. However, liberalism in practicality is regressive by all standards. For example, as a country we made hiring people based on things like skin color and/or gender illegal decades ago. And yet somehow in 2022 we are still effectively hiring the most powerful people in the country based specifically on race and gender.

Furthermore, it should go without saying that if the establishment wanted to nominate the most qualified person predicated solely on skin color and gender (in collusion with merit) then a white man would probably end up being the choice. But, let's be honest, the entire reason the Biden administration promised to nominate a black woman was because liberals don't want a white man nominated. So, if a white man were to be selected, he would definitely have to be homosexual or Jewish (or his primary identity would have to be something other than white man; e.g., Pete Buttigieg). And even if that were to happen, it would still likely be considered racist and sexist (or whatever the current phase is).

Then again, it's common knowledge that liberals are the real white supremacists. So, maybe in 30 years they will inconspicuously nominate a black woman trapped in a racist white man's body to replace Jackson, and bring things full circle.

Don't Make The Black Kid Angry

Just another day in America, where a black kid gets angry and chases down a white kid in front of hundreds of people and sucker punches him from behind while he is running a race.

It's totally normal. It's one of the strengths of diversity. In fact, no charges were filed or anything because that might have even made things worse. So the white kid just accepted his dose of strength like a true American does.

I can hear the Karen's and Fellow Whites from miles away yelling: "You're only posting this because you're a racist! You wouldn't say anything if the races were reversed and the white kid had chased down the black kid and sucker punched him from behind."

I'm can't remember the last time a white kid chased down a black kid while he was running a race and sucker punched him from behind in front of hundreds of people, then just casually walked away like nothing happened. But, the Karen's and Fellow Whites wouldn't have to worry about me getting upset about it, because it would be international news. There would probably even be riots and looting peaceful protesting if the white kid didn't get some serious prison time for committing such an obvious racism.

Diversity is such a great strength for white countries that you just have to overlook random acts of violence at track meets. If your child gets attacked for making a black kid angry, they should just realize they were in the wrong and the entire family publicly apologize to the attacker and things will eventually blow over.

Just imagine how boring America would be without the joys of diversity. That white kid will be able to tell his grandchildren about the time he was running a race at a high school track meet and was chased down from behind and sucker punched because he was white winning the race. 

And think about all of those parents in the stands. It would have just been another boring track meet filled with gossip if not for diversity. White people are so boring!

That black kid will be treated like a hero in his school. And deservedly so. He single-handedly made track meets interesting again. The stands will be full every time he competes.

Diversity is our strength!

The Economic Rise And Fall Of Empires

An excellent video that explains how the changing of New World Orders take shape.

An Avocado a Day Keeps the Doctor Away

https://scitechdaily.com/30-year-study-finds-eating-two-servings-of-avocados-a-week-linked-to-lower-risk-of-cardiovascular-disease/

Eating two or more servings of avocado weekly was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, and substituting avocado for certain fat-containing foods like butter, cheese, or processed meats was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease events, according to new research published today in the Journal of the American Heart Association, an open access, peer-reviewed journal of the American Heart Association.

Avocados contain dietary fiber, unsaturated fats especially monounsaturated fat (healthy fats) and other favorable components that have been associated with good cardiovascular health. Clinical trials have previously found avocados have a positive impact on cardiovascular risk factors including high cholesterol.

Researchers believe this is the first, large, prospective study to support the positive association between higher avocado consumption and lower cardiovascular events, such as coronary heart disease and stroke.

The analysis found:

• After considering a wide range of cardiovascular risk factors and overall diet, study participants who ate at least two servings of avocado each week had a 16% lower risk of cardiovascular disease and a 21% lower risk of coronary heart disease, compared to those who never or rarely ate avocados.
• Based on statistical modeling, replacing half a serving daily of margarine, butter, egg, yogurt, cheese or processed meats such as bacon with the same amount of avocado was associated with a 16% to 22% lower risk of cardiovascular disease events.
• Substituting half a serving a day of avocado for the equivalent amount of olive oil, nuts and other plant oils showed no additional benefit.
• No significant associations were noted in relation to stroke risk and how much avocado was eaten. 

Or you could just keep eating the typical Western diet and live your life on ultra-processed foods, GMOs, McDs and pharmaceuticals.

Imagine living in a society that cares about you so much that they will:

• crash the economy
• lockdown your movement
• force you to wear masks
• force you to take gene-editing injections
• feed you a diet of GMOs, McDs and soda
• prescribe multiple pharmaceuticals to combat poor health from bad diet

It's really insane to try to work out the logic of our leaders. They are obsessed with not letting us get sick, but feed us things that will get us sick.

Your body is a temple. Treat it as such. 

Start paying close attention to everything you put in your body. It's your responsibility to look after your health and well being. Not the governments. 

Be smart and stay healthy.

Whole foods with minimal amount of processed foods (yogurt, nuts, oats, frozen fruits and berries, etc) should be the goal. 

And get at least 30 minutes of exercise a day.

Remember. You are what you eat.

 

Former Convict Speaks About His Time In Prison With Matt Hale

The old saying is that Matt Hale got 40 years for not saying "NO!" loud enough.

Regardless of how you feel about Matt Hale's beliefs, most people who look at his case objectively see that he is a political prisoner. There are people doing a lot less time for much more serious crimes.

What I find most interesting about the Matt Hale case, is that all of these liberals have this fascination with "miscarriages of justice" based on race, yet they never mention Matt Hale. This goes to show that they aren't serious about "miscarriages of justice," because if they were Matt Hale would be the poster child for "miscarriage of justice" or people given harsh prison sentence because of their race and beliefs.

Imagine if Matt Hale was a black man? I have no doubt that if he were he would have been exonerated years ago. There just isn't sufficient evidence to show that he deserves 40 years in federal prison for what he was accused of.

In fact, there was a black man on death row in Oklahoma who got his death sentence commuted at the last minute just because he was black and a bunch of famous liberal activists protested for him. Nobody really thinks he is innocent. The governor who granted him clemency ever said as such. And I say "because he is black," because at the same time another Oklahoma inmate with a questionable conviction was asking for clemency and was denied (he was white).

And this goes without mentioning that not only was Hale given 40 years, but he has done most of them in the nation's Supermax prison, designed for the worst of the worst. 

The narrator of the video does a pretty good job, but goes down a rabbit hole the last 20 or 30 minutes demanding a public apology from Matt and his elderly mother, which is kinda weird. Other than that, worth a watch.

Sunday Scripture

Proverbs 30:5-6

Every word of God proves true. He defends all who come to him for protection. Do not add to his words, or he may rebuke you, and you will be found a liar.